Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1997 Feb;17(2):537–544. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.2.537

A novel, transformation-relevant activation domain in Fos proteins.

M Funk 1, B Poensgen 1, W Graulich 1, V Jerome 1, R Müller 1
PMCID: PMC231778  PMID: 9001206

Abstract

We have previously demonstrated that transformation by Fos is critically dependent on an intact DNA-binding domain (bZip) and a functional N-terminal transactivation motif (N-TM). We now show that a novel motif (C-terminal transactivation motif [C-TM]) near the C terminus also plays an important role in both transformation and the activation of AP1-dependent transcription and that the hydrophobic amino acids in the C-TM are functionally essential. The C-TM is the most crucial element in the C-terminal transactivation domain in Fos, as indicated by its relative strength and context-independent function. The C-TM is clearly different from the previously identified HOB2 domain, located N terminally to the C-TM, and the C-terminally positioned TATA-binding protein-binding domain. We also show that the C-terminal transactivation domain strongly synergizes with the HOB1-like N-TM, even when both domains are present on different proteins within a dimeric complex, and that the C-TM plays a crucial role in this cooperation. These observations can be corroborated in a model in which multiple contacts with the basal machinery are established either to stabilize the transcription complex or to facilitate its sequential assembly.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (430.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abken H., Reifenrath B. A procedure to standardize CAT reporter gene assay. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Jul 11;20(13):3527–3527. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.13.3527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Angel P., Baumann I., Stein B., Delius H., Rahmsdorf H. J., Herrlich P. 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate induction of the human collagenase gene is mediated by an inducible enhancer element located in the 5'-flanking region. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Jun;7(6):2256–2266. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.6.2256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baichwal V. R., Park A., Tjian R. The cell-type-specific activator region of c-Jun juxtaposes constitutive and negatively regulated domains. Genes Dev. 1992 Aug;6(8):1493–1502. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.8.1493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baichwal V. R., Park A., Tjian R. v-Src and EJ Ras alleviate repression of c-Jun by a cell-specific inhibitor. Nature. 1991 Jul 11;352(6331):165–168. doi: 10.1038/352165a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baichwal V. R., Tjian R. Control of c-Jun activity by interaction of a cell-specific inhibitor with regulatory domain delta: differences between v- and c-Jun. Cell. 1990 Nov 16;63(4):815–825. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90147-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown H. J., Sutherland J. A., Cook A., Bannister A. J., Kouzarides T. An inhibitor domain in c-Fos regulates activation domains containing the HOB1 motif. EMBO J. 1995 Jan 3;14(1):124–131. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb06982.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cress W. D., Triezenberg S. J. Critical structural elements of the VP16 transcriptional activation domain. Science. 1991 Jan 4;251(4989):87–90. doi: 10.1126/science.1846049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Curran T., Miller A. D., Zokas L., Verma I. M. Viral and cellular fos proteins: a comparative analysis. Cell. 1984 Feb;36(2):259–268. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90219-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Curran T., Verma I. M. FBR murine osteosarcoma virus. I. Molecular analysis and characterization of a 75,000-Da gag-fos fusion product. Virology. 1984 May;135(1):218–228. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(84)90132-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dai T., Rubie E., Franklin C. C., Kraft A., Gillespie D. A., Avruch J., Kyriakis J. M., Woodgett J. R. Stress-activated protein kinases bind directly to the delta domain of c-Jun in resting cells: implications for repression of c-Jun function. Oncogene. 1995 Mar 2;10(5):849–855. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Deng T., Karin M. c-Fos transcriptional activity stimulated by H-Ras-activated protein kinase distinct from JNK and ERK. Nature. 1994 Sep 8;371(6493):171–175. doi: 10.1038/371171a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Drysdale C. M., Dueñas E., Jackson B. M., Reusser U., Braus G. H., Hinnebusch A. G. The transcriptional activator GCN4 contains multiple activation domains that are critically dependent on hydrophobic amino acids. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Mar;15(3):1220–1233. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.3.1220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Finkel M. P., Biskis B. O., Jinkins P. B. Virus induction of osteosarcomas in mice. Science. 1966 Feb 11;151(3711):698–701. doi: 10.1126/science.151.3711.698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gentz R., Rauscher F. J., 3rd, Abate C., Curran T. Parallel association of Fos and Jun leucine zippers juxtaposes DNA binding domains. Science. 1989 Mar 31;243(4899):1695–1699. doi: 10.1126/science.2494702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Horvath A., Riezman H. Rapid protein extraction from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1994 Oct;10(10):1305–1310. doi: 10.1002/yea.320101007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jenuwein T., Müller D., Curran T., Müller R. Extended life span and tumorigenicity of nonestablished mouse connective tissue cells transformed by the fos oncogene of FBR-MuSV. Cell. 1985 Jun;41(2):629–637. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80035-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jenuwein T., Müller R. Structure-function analysis of fos protein: a single amino acid change activates the immortalizing potential of v-fos. Cell. 1987 Feb 27;48(4):647–657. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90243-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jooss K. U., Funk M., Müller R. An autonomous N-terminal transactivation domain in Fos protein plays a crucial role in transformation. EMBO J. 1994 Mar 15;13(6):1467–1475. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06401.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jooss K., Müller R. Analysis of temperature-sensitive functions of Fos: lack of a correlation between transformation and TRE-dependent trans-activation. Oncogene. 1992 Oct;7(10):1933–1939. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kouzarides T., Ziff E. The role of the leucine zipper in the fos-jun interaction. Nature. 1988 Dec 15;336(6200):646–651. doi: 10.1038/336646a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lech K., Anderson K., Brent R. DNA-bound Fos proteins activate transcription in yeast. Cell. 1988 Jan 29;52(2):179–184. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90506-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lin Y. S., Green M. R. Mechanism of action of an acidic transcriptional activator in vitro. Cell. 1991 Mar 8;64(5):971–981. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90321-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lin Y. S., Ha I., Maldonado E., Reinberg D., Green M. R. Binding of general transcription factor TFIIB to an acidic activating region. Nature. 1991 Oct 10;353(6344):569–571. doi: 10.1038/353569a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lucibello F. C., Neuberg M., Jenuwein T., Müller R. Multiple regions of v-Fos protein involved in the activation of AP1-dependent transcription: is trans-activation crucial for transformation? New Biol. 1991 Jul;3(7):671–677. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Metz R., Bannister A. J., Sutherland J. A., Hagemeier C., O'Rourke E. C., Cook A., Bravo R., Kouzarides T. c-Fos-induced activation of a TATA-box-containing promoter involves direct contact with TATA-box-binding protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Sep;14(9):6021–6029. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.9.6021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mumberg D., Müller R., Funk M. Regulatable promoters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: comparison of transcriptional activity and their use for heterologous expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Dec 25;22(25):5767–5768. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.25.5767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mumberg D., Müller R., Funk M. Yeast vectors for the controlled expression of heterologous proteins in different genetic backgrounds. Gene. 1995 Apr 14;156(1):119–122. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00037-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mölders H., Jenuwein T., Adamkiewicz J., Müller R. Isolation and structural analysis of a biologically active chicken c-fos cDNA: identification of evolutionarily conserved domains in fos protein. Oncogene. 1987;1(4):377–385. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Neuberg M., Schuermann M., Hunter J. B., Müller R. Two functionally different regions in Fos are required for the sequence-specific DNA interaction of the Fos/Jun protein complex. Nature. 1989 Apr 13;338(6216):589–590. doi: 10.1038/338589a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Neuberg M., Schuermann M., Müller R. Mutagenesis of the DNA contact site in Fos protein: compatibility with the scissors grip model and requirement for transformation. Oncogene. 1991 Aug;6(8):1325–1333. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nishizawa M., Goto N., Kawai S. An avian transforming retrovirus isolated from a nephroblastoma that carries the fos gene as the oncogene. J Virol. 1987 Dec;61(12):3733–3740. doi: 10.1128/jvi.61.12.3733-3740.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nordeen S. K. Luciferase reporter gene vectors for analysis of promoters and enhancers. Biotechniques. 1988 May;6(5):454–458. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Oliviero S., Robinson G. S., Struhl K., Spiegelman B. M. Yeast GCN4 as a probe for oncogenesis by AP-1 transcription factors: transcriptional activation through AP-1 sites is not sufficient for cellular transformation. Genes Dev. 1992 Sep;6(9):1799–1809. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.9.1799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ryseck R. P., Hirai S. I., Yaniv M., Bravo R. Transcriptional activation of c-jun during the G0/G1 transition in mouse fibroblasts. Nature. 1988 Aug 11;334(6182):535–537. doi: 10.1038/334535a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rüther U., Wagner E. F., Müller R. Analysis of the differentiation-promoting potential of inducible c-fos genes introduced into embryonal carcinoma cells. EMBO J. 1985 Jul;4(7):1775–1781. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb03850.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Schuermann M. An expression vector system for stable expression of oncogenes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Aug 25;18(16):4945–4946. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.16.4945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Schuermann M., Neuberg M., Hunter J. B., Jenuwein T., Ryseck R. P., Bravo R., Müller R. The leucine repeat motif in Fos protein mediates complex formation with Jun/AP-1 and is required for transformation. Cell. 1989 Feb 10;56(3):507–516. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90253-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sutherland J. A., Cook A., Bannister A. J., Kouzarides T. Conserved motifs in Fos and Jun define a new class of activation domain. Genes Dev. 1992 Sep;6(9):1810–1819. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.9.1810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tjian R., Maniatis T. Transcriptional activation: a complex puzzle with few easy pieces. Cell. 1994 Apr 8;77(1):5–8. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90227-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Triezenberg S. J. Structure and function of transcriptional activation domains. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1995 Apr;5(2):190–196. doi: 10.1016/0959-437x(95)80007-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Turner R., Tjian R. Leucine repeats and an adjacent DNA binding domain mediate the formation of functional cFos-cJun heterodimers. Science. 1989 Mar 31;243(4899):1689–1694. doi: 10.1126/science.2494701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Van Beveren C., Enami S., Curran T., Verma I. M. FBR murine osteosarcoma virus. II. Nucleotide sequence of the provirus reveals that the genome contains sequences acquired from two cellular genes. Virology. 1984 May;135(1):229–243. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(84)90133-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Van Beveren C., van Straaten F., Curran T., Müller R., Verma I. M. Analysis of FBJ-MuSV provirus and c-fos (mouse) gene reveals that viral and cellular fos gene products have different carboxy termini. Cell. 1983 Apr;32(4):1241–1255. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90306-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wick M., Lucibello F. C., Müller R. Inhibition of Fos- and Ras-induced transformation by mutant Fos proteins with structural alterations in functionally different domains. Oncogene. 1992 May;7(5):859–867. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zerial M., Toschi L., Ryseck R. P., Schuermann M., Müller R., Bravo R. The product of a novel growth factor activated gene, fos B, interacts with JUN proteins enhancing their DNA binding activity. EMBO J. 1989 Mar;8(3):805–813. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03441.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. van Straaten F., Müller R., Curran T., Van Beveren C., Verma I. M. Complete nucleotide sequence of a human c-onc gene: deduced amino acid sequence of the human c-fos protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jun;80(11):3183–3187. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.11.3183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES