Skip to main content
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1997 Feb;17(2):989–998. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.2.989

An alternative splicing event which occurs in mouse pachytene spermatocytes generates a form of DNA ligase III with distinct biochemical properties that may function in meiotic recombination.

Z B Mackey 1, W Ramos 1, D S Levin 1, C A Walter 1, J R McCarrey 1, A E Tomkinson 1
PMCID: PMC231824  PMID: 9001252

Abstract

Three mammalian genes encoding DNA ligases have been identified. However, the role of each of these enzymes in mammalian DNA metabolism has not been established. In this study, we show that two forms of mammalian DNA ligase III, alpha and beta, are produced by a conserved tissue-specific alternative splicing mechanism involving exons encoding the C termini of the polypeptides. DNA ligase III-alpha cDNA, which encodes a 103-kDa polypeptide, is expressed in all tissues and cells, whereas DNA ligase III-beta cDNA, which encodes a 96-kDa polypeptide, is expressed only in the testis. During male germ cell differentiation, elevated expression of DNA ligase III-beta mRNA is restricted, beginning only in the latter stages of meiotic prophase and ending in the round spermatid stage. In 96-kDa DNA ligase III-beta, the C-terminal 77 amino acids of DNA ligase III-alpha are replaced by a different 17- to 18-amino acid sequence. As reported previously, the 103-kDa DNA ligase III-alpha interacts with the DNA strand break repair protein encoded by the human XRCC1 gene. In contrast, the 96-kDa DNA ligase III-beta does not interact with XRCC1, indicating that DNA ligase III-beta may play a role in cellular functions distinct from the DNA repair pathways involving the DNA ligase III-alpha x XRCC1 complex. The distinct biochemical properties of DNA ligase III-beta, in combination with the tissue- and cell-type-specific expression of DNA ligase III-beta mRNA, suggest that this form of DNA ligase III is specifically involved in the completion of homologous recombination events that occur during meiotic prophase.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (6.9 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alcivar A. A., Hake L. E., Hecht N. B. DNA polymerase-beta and poly(ADP)ribose polymerase mRNAs are differentially expressed during the development of male germinal cells. Biol Reprod. 1992 Feb;46(2):201–207. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod46.2.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baldin V., Lukas J., Marcote M. J., Pagano M., Draetta G. Cyclin D1 is a nuclear protein required for cell cycle progression in G1. Genes Dev. 1993 May;7(5):812–821. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.5.812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardwell L., Cooper A. J., Friedberg E. C. Stable and specific association between the yeast recombination and DNA repair proteins RAD1 and RAD10 in vitro. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Jul;12(7):3041–3049. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.7.3041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barnes D. E., Johnston L. H., Kodama K., Tomkinson A. E., Lasko D. D., Lindahl T. Human DNA ligase I cDNA: cloning and functional expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Sep;87(17):6679–6683. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.17.6679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barnes D. E., Tomkinson A. E., Lehmann A. R., Webster A. D., Lindahl T. Mutations in the DNA ligase I gene of an individual with immunodeficiencies and cellular hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. Cell. 1992 May 1;69(3):495–503. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90450-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bellvé A. R., Cavicchia J. C., Millette C. F., O'Brien D. A., Bhatnagar Y. M., Dym M. Spermatogenic cells of the prepuberal mouse. Isolation and morphological characterization. J Cell Biol. 1977 Jul;74(1):68–85. doi: 10.1083/jcb.74.1.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bishop D. K. RecA homologs Dmc1 and Rad51 interact to form multiple nuclear complexes prior to meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell. 1994 Dec 16;79(6):1081–1092. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90038-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Caldecott K. W., McKeown C. K., Tucker J. D., Ljungquist S., Thompson L. H. An interaction between the mammalian DNA repair protein XRCC1 and DNA ligase III. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jan;14(1):68–76. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.1.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Caldecott K. W., Tucker J. D., Stanker L. H., Thompson L. H. Characterization of the XRCC1-DNA ligase III complex in vitro and its absence from mutant hamster cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Dec 11;23(23):4836–4843. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.23.4836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen J., Tomkinson A. E., Ramos W., Mackey Z. B., Danehower S., Walter C. A., Schultz R. A., Besterman J. M., Husain I. Mammalian DNA ligase III: molecular cloning, chromosomal localization, and expression in spermatocytes undergoing meiotic recombination. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Oct;15(10):5412–5422. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.10.5412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fujimoto H., Erickson R. P., Toné S. Changes in polyadenylation of lactate dehydrogenase-X mRNA during spermatogenesis in mice. Mol Reprod Dev. 1988;1(1):27–34. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1080010106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Glisin V., Crkvenjakov R., Byus C. Ribonucleic acid isolated by cesium chloride centrifugation. Biochemistry. 1974 Jun 4;13(12):2633–2637. doi: 10.1021/bi00709a025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Goodson M. L., Park-Sarge O. K., Sarge K. D. Tissue-dependent expression of heat shock factor 2 isoforms with distinct transcriptional activities. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Oct;15(10):5288–5293. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.10.5288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gu W., Morales C., Hecht N. B. In male mouse germ cells, copper-zinc superoxide dismutase utilizes alternative promoters that produce multiple transcripts with different translation potential. J Biol Chem. 1995 Jan 6;270(1):236–243. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.1.236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Haaf T., Golub E. I., Reddy G., Radding C. M., Ward D. C. Nuclear foci of mammalian Rad51 recombination protein in somatic cells after DNA damage and its localization in synaptonemal complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Mar 14;92(6):2298–2302. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.6.2298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hake L. E., Alcivar A. A., Hecht N. B. Changes in mRNA length accompany translational regulation of the somatic and testis-specific cytochrome c genes during spermatogenesis in the mouse. Development. 1990 Sep;110(1):249–257. doi: 10.1242/dev.110.1.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hake L. E., Kuemmerle N., Hecht N. B., Kozak C. A. The genes encoding the somatic and testis-specific isotypes of the mouse cytochrome c genes map to paralogous regions of chromosomes 6 and 2. Genomics. 1994 Apr;20(3):503–505. doi: 10.1006/geno.1994.1210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Henderson L. M., Arlett C. F., Harcourt S. A., Lehmann A. R., Broughton B. C. Cells from an immunodeficient patient (46BR) with a defect in DNA ligation are hypomutable but hypersensitive to the induction of sister chromatid exchanges. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Apr;82(7):2044–2048. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.7.2044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Inoue M., Kurihara T., Yamashita M., Tatsumi K. Effects of treatment with methyl methanesulfonate during meiotic and postmeiotic stages and maturation of spermatozoa in mice. Mutat Res. 1993 Aug;294(2):179–186. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(93)90026-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lasko D. D., Tomkinson A. E., Lindahl T. Mammalian DNA ligases. Biosynthesis and intracellular localization of DNA ligase I. J Biol Chem. 1990 Jul 25;265(21):12618–12622. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lehmann A. R., Willis A. E., Broughton B. C., James M. R., Steingrimsdottir H., Harcourt S. A., Arlett C. F., Lindahl T. Relation between the human fibroblast strain 46BR and cell lines representative of Bloom's syndrome. Cancer Res. 1988 Nov 15;48(22):6343–6347. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ljungquist S., Kenne K., Olsson L., Sandström M. Altered DNA ligase III activity in the CHO EM9 mutant. Mutat Res. 1994 Mar;314(2):177–186. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(94)90081-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Masson N., Hurst H. C., Lee K. A. Identification of proteins that interact with CREB during differentiation of F9 embryonal carcinoma cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Jun 11;21(11):1163–1169. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.5.1163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McCarrey J. R., Berg W. M., Paragioudakis S. J., Zhang P. L., Dilworth D. D., Arnold B. L., Rossi J. J. Differential transcription of Pgk genes during spermatogenesis in the mouse. Dev Biol. 1992 Nov;154(1):160–168. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(92)90056-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nevins J. R. The pathway of eukaryotic mRNA formation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1983;52:441–466. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.52.070183.002301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Prasad R., Singhal R. K., Srivastava D. K., Molina J. T., Tomkinson A. E., Wilson S. H. Specific interaction of DNA polymerase beta and DNA ligase I in a multiprotein base excision repair complex from bovine testis. J Biol Chem. 1996 Jul 5;271(27):16000–16007. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.27.16000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Prigent C., Satoh M. S., Daly G., Barnes D. E., Lindahl T. Aberrant DNA repair and DNA replication due to an inherited enzymatic defect in human DNA ligase I. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jan;14(1):310–317. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.1.310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Romrell L. J., Bellvé A. R., Fawcett D. W. Separation of mouse spermatogenic cells by sedimentation velocity. A morphological characterization. Dev Biol. 1976 Mar;49(1):119–131. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90262-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ron D., Dressler H. pGSTag--a versatile bacterial expression plasmid for enzymatic labeling of recombinant proteins. Biotechniques. 1992 Dec;13(6):866–869. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Saiki R. K., Scharf S., Faloona F., Mullis K. B., Horn G. T., Erlich H. A., Arnheim N. Enzymatic amplification of beta-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science. 1985 Dec 20;230(4732):1350–1354. doi: 10.1126/science.2999980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sobol R. W., Horton J. K., Kühn R., Gu H., Singhal R. K., Prasad R., Rajewsky K., Wilson S. H. Requirement of mammalian DNA polymerase-beta in base-excision repair. Nature. 1996 Jan 11;379(6561):183–186. doi: 10.1038/379183a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Speed R. M. Meiosis in the foetal mouse ovary. I. An analysis at the light microscope level using surface-spreading. Chromosoma. 1982;85(3):427–437. doi: 10.1007/BF00330366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Söderhäll S. DNA ligases during rat liver regeneration. Nature. 1976 Apr 15;260(5552):640–642. doi: 10.1038/260640a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Teo I. A., Arlett C. F., Harcourt S. A., Priestley A., Broughton B. C. Multiple hypersensitivity to mutagens in a cell strain (46BR) derived from a patient with immuno-deficiencies. Mutat Res. 1983 Feb;107(2):371–386. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(83)90177-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Thompson L. H., Brookman K. W., Jones N. J., Allen S. A., Carrano A. V. Molecular cloning of the human XRCC1 gene, which corrects defective DNA strand break repair and sister chromatid exchange. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Dec;10(12):6160–6171. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.12.6160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tomkinson A. E., Lasko D. D., Daly G., Lindahl T. Mammalian DNA ligases. Catalytic domain and size of DNA ligase I. J Biol Chem. 1990 Jul 25;265(21):12611–12617. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Waga S., Bauer G., Stillman B. Reconstitution of complete SV40 DNA replication with purified replication factors. J Biol Chem. 1994 Apr 8;269(14):10923–10934. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Walter C. A., Lu J., Bhakta M., Zhou Z. Q., Thompson L. H., McCarrey J. R. Testis and somatic Xrcc-1 DNA repair gene expression. Somat Cell Mol Genet. 1994 Nov;20(6):451–461. doi: 10.1007/BF02255837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Walter C. A., Trolian D. A., McFarland M. B., Street K. A., Gurram G. R., McCarrey J. R. Xrcc-1 expression during male meiosis in the mouse. Biol Reprod. 1996 Sep;55(3):630–635. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod55.3.630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wei Y. F., Robins P., Carter K., Caldecott K., Pappin D. J., Yu G. L., Wang R. P., Shell B. K., Nash R. A., Schär P. Molecular cloning and expression of human cDNAs encoding a novel DNA ligase IV and DNA ligase III, an enzyme active in DNA repair and recombination. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;15(6):3206–3216. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.6.3206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wilcock D., Lane D. P. Localization of p53, retinoblastoma and host replication proteins at sites of viral replication in herpes-infected cells. Nature. 1991 Jan 31;349(6308):429–431. doi: 10.1038/349429a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. de Murcia G., Ménissier de Murcia J. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase: a molecular nick-sensor. Trends Biochem Sci. 1994 Apr;19(4):172–176. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90280-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES