Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1995 Jan;15(1):208–216. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.1.208

Functional analysis of Met4, a yeast transcriptional activator responsive to S-adenosylmethionine.

L Kuras 1, D Thomas 1
PMCID: PMC231936  PMID: 7799928

Abstract

Transcription of the genes necessary for sulfur amino acid biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is dependent on Met4, a transcriptional activator that belongs to the basic region-leucine zipper protein family. In this report, we show that one mechanism permitting the repression of the sulfur network by S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) involves inhibition of the transcriptional activation function of Met4. Using a wide array of deleted LexA-Met4 fusion proteins as well as various Gal4-Met4 hybrids, we identify the functional domains of Met4 and characterize their relationship. Met4 appears to contain only one activation domain, located in its N-terminal part. We demonstrate that this activation domain functions in a constitutive manner and that AdoMet responsiveness requires a distinct region of Met4. Furthermore, we show that when fused to a heterologous activation domain, this inhibitory region confers inhibition by AdoMet. Met4 contains another distinct functional domain that appears to function as an antagonist of the inhibitory region when intracellular AdoMet is low. On the basis of the presented results, a model for intramolecular regulation of Met4 is proposed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (576.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker R. E., Masison D. C. Isolation of the gene encoding the Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromere-binding protein CP1. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Jun;10(6):2458–2467. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.6.2458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cai M., Davis R. W. Yeast centromere binding protein CBF1, of the helix-loop-helix protein family, is required for chromosome stability and methionine prototrophy. Cell. 1990 May 4;61(3):437–446. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90525-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cherest H., Surdin-Kerjan Y. Genetic analysis of a new mutation conferring cysteine auxotrophy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: updating of the sulfur metabolism pathway. Genetics. 1992 Jan;130(1):51–58. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Courey A. J., Tjian R. Analysis of Sp1 in vivo reveals multiple transcriptional domains, including a novel glutamine-rich activation motif. Cell. 1988 Dec 2;55(5):887–898. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90144-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cress W. D., Triezenberg S. J. Critical structural elements of the VP16 transcriptional activation domain. Science. 1991 Jan 4;251(4989):87–90. doi: 10.1126/science.1846049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Flick J. S., Johnston M. Two systems of glucose repression of the GAL1 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Sep;10(9):4757–4769. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.9.4757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Foulkes N. S., Mellström B., Benusiglio E., Sassone-Corsi P. Developmental switch of CREM function during spermatogenesis: from antagonist to activator. Nature. 1992 Jan 2;355(6355):80–84. doi: 10.1038/355080a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gietz D., St Jean A., Woods R. A., Schiestl R. H. Improved method for high efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Mar 25;20(6):1425–1425. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.6.1425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gill G., Pascal E., Tseng Z. H., Tjian R. A glutamine-rich hydrophobic patch in transcription factor Sp1 contacts the dTAFII110 component of the Drosophila TFIID complex and mediates transcriptional activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jan 4;91(1):192–196. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.1.192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gill G., Ptashne M. Mutants of GAL4 protein altered in an activation function. Cell. 1987 Oct 9;51(1):121–126. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90016-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Giniger E., Ptashne M. Transcription in yeast activated by a putative amphipathic alpha helix linked to a DNA binding unit. Nature. 1987 Dec 17;330(6149):670–672. doi: 10.1038/330670a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hanes S. D., Brent R. DNA specificity of the bicoid activator protein is determined by homeodomain recognition helix residue 9. Cell. 1989 Jun 30;57(7):1275–1283. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90063-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hieter P., Pridmore D., Hegemann J. H., Thomas M., Davis R. W., Philippsen P. Functional selection and analysis of yeast centromeric DNA. Cell. 1985 Oct;42(3):913–921. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90287-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hodgson C. P., Fisk R. Z. Hybridization probe size control: optimized 'oligolabelling'. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Aug 11;15(15):6295–6295. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.15.6295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hoffman C. S., Winston F. A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli. Gene. 1987;57(2-3):267–272. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90131-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hope I. A., Struhl K. Functional dissection of a eukaryotic transcriptional activator protein, GCN4 of yeast. Cell. 1986 Sep 12;46(6):885–894. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90070-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kerjan P., Cherest H., Surdin-Kerjan Y. Nucleotide sequence of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MET25 gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Oct 24;14(20):7861–7871. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.20.7861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim T. K., Roeder R. G. CTD-like sequences are important for transcriptional activation by the proline-rich activation domain of CTF1. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Jan 25;22(2):251–251. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.2.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Leuther K. K., Salmeron J. M., Johnston S. A. Genetic evidence that an activation domain of GAL4 does not require acidity and may form a beta sheet. Cell. 1993 Feb 26;72(4):575–585. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90076-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ma J., Ptashne M. Deletion analysis of GAL4 defines two transcriptional activating segments. Cell. 1987 Mar 13;48(5):847–853. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90081-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mellor J., Jiang W., Funk M., Rathjen J., Barnes C. A., Hinz T., Hegemann J. H., Philippsen P. CPF1, a yeast protein which functions in centromeres and promoters. EMBO J. 1990 Dec;9(12):4017–4026. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07623.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mermod N., O'Neill E. A., Kelly T. J., Tjian R. The proline-rich transcriptional activator of CTF/NF-I is distinct from the replication and DNA binding domain. Cell. 1989 Aug 25;58(4):741–753. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90108-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ptashne M. How eukaryotic transcriptional activators work. Nature. 1988 Oct 20;335(6192):683–689. doi: 10.1038/335683a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sigler P. B. Transcriptional activation. Acid blobs and negative noodles. Nature. 1988 May 19;333(6170):210–212. doi: 10.1038/333210a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Stone G., Sadowski I. GAL4 is regulated by a glucose-responsive functional domain. EMBO J. 1993 Apr;12(4):1375–1385. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05782.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Thomas D., Cherest H., Surdin-Kerjan Y. Elements involved in S-adenosylmethionine-mediated regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MET25 gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Aug;9(8):3292–3298. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.8.3292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Thomas D., Jacquemin I., Surdin-Kerjan Y. MET4, a leucine zipper protein, and centromere-binding factor 1 are both required for transcriptional activation of sulfur metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Apr;12(4):1719–1727. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.4.1719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Thomas D., Rothstein R., Rosenberg N., Surdin-Kerjan Y. SAM2 encodes the second methionine S-adenosyl transferase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: physiology and regulation of both enzymes. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;8(12):5132–5139. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.12.5132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Thomas P. S. Hybridization of denatured RNA and small DNA fragments transferred to nitrocellulose. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Sep;77(9):5201–5205. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.9.5201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES