Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1995 Jan;15(1):456–465. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.1.456

Nucleolin is a matrix attachment region DNA-binding protein that specifically recognizes a region with high base-unpairing potential.

L A Dickinson 1, T Kohwi-Shigematsu 1
PMCID: PMC231991  PMID: 7799955

Abstract

A DNA affinity column containing a synthetic double-stranded nuclear matrix attachment region (MAR) was used to purify a 100-kDa protein from human erythroleukemia K562 cells. This protein was identified as nucleolin, the key nucleolar protein of dividing cells, which is thought to control rRNA gene transcription and ribosome assembly. Nucleolin is known to bind RNA and single-stranded DNA. We report here that nucleolin is also a MAR-binding protein. It binds double-stranded MARs from different species with high affinity. Nucleolin effectively distinguishes between a double-stranded wild-type synthetic MAR sequence with a high base-unpairing potential and its mutated version that has lost the unpairing capability but is still A+T rich. Thus, nucleolin is not merely an A+T-rich sequence-binding protein but specifically binds the base-unpairing region of MARs. This binding specificity is similar to that of the previously cloned tissue-specific MAR-binding protein SATB1. Unlike SATB1, which binds only double-stranded MARs, nucleolin binds the single-stranded T-rich strand of the synthetic MAR probe approximately 45-fold more efficiently than its complementary A-rich strand, which has an affinity comparable to that of the double-stranded form of the MAR. In contrast to the high selectivity of binding to double-stranded MARs, nucleolin shows only a small but distinct sequence preference for the T-rich strand of the wild-type synthetic MAR over the T-rich strand of its mutated version. The affinity to the T-rich synthetic MAR is severalfold higher than to its corresponding RNA and human telomere DNA. Quantitative cellular fractionation and extraction experiments indicate that nucleolin is present both as a soluble protein and tightly bound to the matrix, similar to other known MAR-binding proteins.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (482.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adachi Y., Käs E., Laemmli U. K. Preferential, cooperative binding of DNA topoisomerase II to scaffold-associated regions. EMBO J. 1989 Dec 20;8(13):3997–4006. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08582.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrijal S., Perros M., Gu Z., Avalosse B. L., Belenguer P., Amalric F., Rommelaere J. Nucleolin forms a specific complex with a fragment of the viral (minus) strand of minute virus of mice DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Oct 11;20(19):5053–5060. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.19.5053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Belenguer P., Caizergues-Ferrer M., Labbé J. C., Dorée M., Amalric F. Mitosis-specific phosphorylation of nucleolin by p34cdc2 protein kinase. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Jul;10(7):3607–3618. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.7.3607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berrios M., Osheroff N., Fisher P. A. In situ localization of DNA topoisomerase II, a major polypeptide component of the Drosophila nuclear matrix fraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jun;82(12):4142–4146. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.12.4142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bidwell J. P., Van Wijnen A. J., Fey E. G., Dworetzky S., Penman S., Stein J. L., Lian J. B., Stein G. S. Osteocalcin gene promoter-binding factors are tissue-specific nuclear matrix components. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Apr 15;90(8):3162–3166. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.8.3162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bode J., Kohwi Y., Dickinson L., Joh T., Klehr D., Mielke C., Kohwi-Shigematsu T. Biological significance of unwinding capability of nuclear matrix-associating DNAs. Science. 1992 Jan 10;255(5041):195–197. doi: 10.1126/science.1553545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bode J., Maass K. Chromatin domain surrounding the human interferon-beta gene as defined by scaffold-attached regions. Biochemistry. 1988 Jun 28;27(13):4706–4711. doi: 10.1021/bi00413a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bolla R. I., Braaten D. C., Shiomi Y., Hebert M. B., Schlessinger D. Localization of specific rDNA spacer sequences to the mouse L-cell nucleolar matrix. Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Jun;5(6):1287–1294. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.6.1287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Borer R. A., Lehner C. F., Eppenberger H. M., Nigg E. A. Major nucleolar proteins shuttle between nucleus and cytoplasm. Cell. 1989 Feb 10;56(3):379–390. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90241-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bouche G., Caizergues-Ferrer M., Bugler B., Amalric F. Interrelations between the maturation of a 100 kDa nucleolar protein and pre rRNA synthesis in CHO cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Apr 11;12(7):3025–3035. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.7.3025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bugler B., Caizergues-Ferrer M., Bouche G., Bourbon H., Amalric F. Detection and localization of a class of proteins immunologically related to a 100-kDa nucleolar protein. Eur J Biochem. 1982 Nov 15;128(2-3):475–480. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1982.tb06989.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Caizergues-Ferrer M., Mariottini P., Curie C., Lapeyre B., Gas N., Amalric F., Amaldi F. Nucleolin from Xenopus laevis: cDNA cloning and expression during development. Genes Dev. 1989 Mar;3(3):324–333. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.3.324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen C. M., Chiang S. Y., Yeh N. H. Increased stability of nucleolin in proliferating cells by inhibition of its self-cleaving activity. J Biol Chem. 1991 Apr 25;266(12):7754–7758. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cockell M., Frutiger S., Hughes G. J., Gasser S. M. The yeast protein encoded by PUB1 binds T-rich single stranded DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Jan 11;22(1):32–40. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.1.32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cockerill P. N., Garrard W. T. Chromosomal loop anchorage of the kappa immunoglobulin gene occurs next to the enhancer in a region containing topoisomerase II sites. Cell. 1986 Jan 31;44(2):273–282. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90761-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cockerill P. N., Yuen M. H., Garrard W. T. The enhancer of the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus is flanked by presumptive chromosomal loop anchorage elements. J Biol Chem. 1987 Apr 15;262(11):5394–5397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cunningham J. M., Purucker M. E., Jane S. M., Safer B., Vanin E. F., Ney P. A., Lowrey C. H., Nienhuis A. W. The regulatory element 3' to the A gamma-globin gene binds to the nuclear matrix and interacts with special A-T-rich binding protein 1 (SATB1), an SAR/MAR-associating region DNA binding protein. Blood. 1994 Aug 15;84(4):1298–1308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dickinson L. A., Joh T., Kohwi Y., Kohwi-Shigematsu T. A tissue-specific MAR/SAR DNA-binding protein with unusual binding site recognition. Cell. 1992 Aug 21;70(4):631–645. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90432-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dignam J. D., Lebovitz R. M., Roeder R. G. Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Mar 11;11(5):1475–1489. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.5.1475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dijkwel P. A., Hamlin J. L. Matrix attachment regions are positioned near replication initiation sites, genes, and an interamplicon junction in the amplified dihydrofolate reductase domain of Chinese hamster ovary cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;8(12):5398–5409. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.12.5398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Earnshaw W. C., Heck M. M. Localization of topoisomerase II in mitotic chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 1985 May;100(5):1716–1725. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.5.1716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Earnshaw W. C. Mitotic chromosome structure. Bioessays. 1988 Nov;9(5):147–150. doi: 10.1002/bies.950090502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fackelmayer F. O., Dahm K., Renz A., Ramsperger U., Richter A. Nucleic-acid-binding properties of hnRNP-U/SAF-A, a nuclear-matrix protein which binds DNA and RNA in vivo and in vitro. Eur J Biochem. 1994 Apr 15;221(2):749–757. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18788.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Franke W. W., Kleinschmidt J. A., Spring H., Krohne G., Grund C., Trendelenburg M. F., Stoehr M., Scheer U. A nucleolar skeleton of protein filaments demonstrated in amplified nucleoli of Xenopus laevis. J Cell Biol. 1981 Aug;90(2):289–299. doi: 10.1083/jcb.90.2.289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fried M., Crothers D. M. Equilibria and kinetics of lac repressor-operator interactions by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Dec 11;9(23):6505–6525. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.23.6505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gasser S. M., Laemmli U. K. Cohabitation of scaffold binding regions with upstream/enhancer elements of three developmentally regulated genes of D. melanogaster. Cell. 1986 Aug 15;46(4):521–530. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90877-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gasser S. M., Laemmli U. K. The organisation of chromatin loops: characterization of a scaffold attachment site. EMBO J. 1986 Mar;5(3):511–518. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04240.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gasser S. M., Laroche T., Falquet J., Boy de la Tour E., Laemmli U. K. Metaphase chromosome structure. Involvement of topoisomerase II. J Mol Biol. 1986 Apr 20;188(4):613–629. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(86)80010-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ghisolfi L., Joseph G., Amalric F., Erard M. The glycine-rich domain of nucleolin has an unusual supersecondary structure responsible for its RNA-helix-destabilizing properties. J Biol Chem. 1992 Feb 15;267(5):2955–2959. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hager D. A., Burgess R. R. Elution of proteins from sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels, removal of sodium dodecyl sulfate, and renaturation of enzymatic activity: results with sigma subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase, wheat germ DNA topoisomerase, and other enzymes. Anal Biochem. 1980 Nov 15;109(1):76–86. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(80)90013-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hakes D. J., Berezney R. DNA binding properties of the nuclear matrix and individual nuclear matrix proteins. Evidence for salt-resistant DNA binding sites. J Biol Chem. 1991 Jun 15;266(17):11131–11140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Herrera A. H., Olson M. O. Association of protein C23 with rapidly labeled nucleolar RNA. Biochemistry. 1986 Oct 7;25(20):6258–6264. doi: 10.1021/bi00368a063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hozák P., Hassan A. B., Jackson D. A., Cook P. R. Visualization of replication factories attached to nucleoskeleton. Cell. 1993 Apr 23;73(2):361–373. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90235-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ishikawa F., Matunis M. J., Dreyfuss G., Cech T. R. Nuclear proteins that bind the pre-mRNA 3' splice site sequence r(UUAG/G) and the human telomeric DNA sequence d(TTAGGG)n. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Jul;13(7):4301–4310. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.7.4301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Izaurralde E., Käs E., Laemmli U. K. Highly preferential nucleation of histone H1 assembly on scaffold-associated regions. J Mol Biol. 1989 Dec 5;210(3):573–585. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90133-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Jackson D. A., Cook P. R., Patel S. B. Attachment of repeated sequences to the nuclear cage. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Sep 11;12(17):6709–6726. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.17.6709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jackson D. A., Cook P. R. Replication occurs at a nucleoskeleton. EMBO J. 1986 Jun;5(6):1403–1410. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04374.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jarman A. P., Higgs D. R. Nuclear scaffold attachment sites in the human globin gene complexes. EMBO J. 1988 Nov;7(11):3337–3344. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03205.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Jordan G. At the heart of the nucleolus. Nature. 1987 Oct 8;329(6139):489–490. doi: 10.1038/329489a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kadonaga J. T., Tjian R. Affinity purification of sequence-specific DNA binding proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Aug;83(16):5889–5893. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.16.5889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kaufmann S. H., Gibson W., Shaper J. H. Characterization of the major polypeptides of the rat liver nuclear envelope. J Biol Chem. 1983 Feb 25;258(4):2710–2719. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kim C., Snyder R. O., Wold M. S. Binding properties of replication protein A from human and yeast cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Jul;12(7):3050–3059. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.7.3050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Klehr D., Maass K., Bode J. Scaffold-attached regions from the human interferon beta domain can be used to enhance the stable expression of genes under the control of various promoters. Biochemistry. 1991 Feb 5;30(5):1264–1270. doi: 10.1021/bi00219a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kohwi-Shigematsu T., Kohwi Y. Torsional stress stabilizes extended base unpairing in suppressor sites flanking immunoglobulin heavy chain enhancer. Biochemistry. 1990 Oct 16;29(41):9551–9560. doi: 10.1021/bi00493a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kopka M. L., Yoon C., Goodsell D., Pjura P., Dickerson R. E. The molecular origin of DNA-drug specificity in netropsin and distamycin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Mar;82(5):1376–1380. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.5.1376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Koudelka G. B., Harrison S. C., Ptashne M. Effect of non-contacted bases on the affinity of 434 operator for 434 repressor and Cro. 1987 Apr 30-May 6Nature. 326(6116):886–888. doi: 10.1038/326886a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Levy-Wilson B., Fortier C. The limits of the DNase I-sensitive domain of the human apolipoprotein B gene coincide with the locations of chromosomal anchorage loops and define the 5' and 3' boundaries of the gene. J Biol Chem. 1989 Dec 15;264(35):21196–21204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Loc P. V., Strätling W. H. The matrix attachment regions of the chicken lysozyme gene co-map with the boundaries of the chromatin domain. EMBO J. 1988 Mar;7(3):655–664. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02860.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Long B. H., Ochs R. L. Nuclear matrix, hnRNA, and snRNA in friend erythroleukemia nuclei depleted of chromatin by low ionic strength EDTA. Biol Cell. 1983;48(2-3):89–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1768-322x.1984.tb00204.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Ludérus M. E., de Graaf A., Mattia E., den Blaauwen J. L., Grande M. A., de Jong L., van Driel R. Binding of matrix attachment regions to lamin B1. Cell. 1992 Sep 18;70(6):949–959. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90245-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. McKnight R. A., Shamay A., Sankaran L., Wall R. J., Hennighausen L. Matrix-attachment regions can impart position-independent regulation of a tissue-specific gene in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Aug 1;89(15):6943–6947. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.15.6943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Mielke C., Kohwi Y., Kohwi-Shigematsu T., Bode J. Hierarchical binding of DNA fragments derived from scaffold-attached regions: correlation of properties in vitro and function in vivo. Biochemistry. 1990 Aug 14;29(32):7475–7485. doi: 10.1021/bi00484a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Mirkovitch J., Mirault M. E., Laemmli U. K. Organization of the higher-order chromatin loop: specific DNA attachment sites on nuclear scaffold. Cell. 1984 Nov;39(1):223–232. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90208-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Nakagomi K., Kohwi Y., Dickinson L. A., Kohwi-Shigematsu T. A novel DNA-binding motif in the nuclear matrix attachment DNA-binding protein SATB1. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Mar;14(3):1852–1860. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.3.1852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Nelson W. G., Pienta K. J., Barrack E. R., Coffey D. S. The role of the nuclear matrix in the organization and function of DNA. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1986;15:457–475. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.15.060186.002325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Olson M. O., Rivers Z. M., Thompson B. A., Kao W. Y., Case S. T. Interaction of nucleolar phosphoprotein C23 with cloned segments of rat ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochemistry. 1983 Jul 5;22(14):3345–3351. doi: 10.1021/bi00283a007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Olson M. O., Thompson B. A. Distribution of proteins among chromatin components of nucleoli. Biochemistry. 1983 Jun 21;22(13):3187–3193. doi: 10.1021/bi00282a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Olson M. O., Wallace M. O., Herrera A. H., Marshall-Carlson L., Hunt R. C. Preribosomal ribonucleoprotein particles are a major component of a nucleolar matrix fraction. Biochemistry. 1986 Jan 28;25(2):484–491. doi: 10.1021/bi00350a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Pfeifle J., Wolff J. M., Anderer F. A. Quantitation and potential function of nucleolar phosphoprotein pp 105 in mouse tumor cells, embryonic cells and normal tissues. Comp Biochem Physiol B. 1987;87(2):309–312. doi: 10.1016/0305-0491(87)90144-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Phi-Van L., von Kries J. P., Ostertag W., Strätling W. H. The chicken lysozyme 5' matrix attachment region increases transcription from a heterologous promoter in heterologous cells and dampens position effects on the expression of transfected genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 May;10(5):2302–2307. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.5.2302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Razin S. V., Kekelidze M. G., Lukanidin E. M., Scherrer K., Georgiev G. P. Replication origins are attached to the nuclear skeleton. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Oct 24;14(20):8189–8207. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.20.8189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Romig H., Fackelmayer F. O., Renz A., Ramsperger U., Richter A. Characterization of SAF-A, a novel nuclear DNA binding protein from HeLa cells with high affinity for nuclear matrix/scaffold attachment DNA elements. EMBO J. 1992 Sep;11(9):3431–3440. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05422.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Sapp M., Knippers R., Richter A. DNA binding properties of a 110 kDa nucleolar protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Sep 11;14(17):6803–6820. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.17.6803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Schmidt A. M., Herterich S. U., Krauss G. A single-stranded DNA binding protein from S. cerevisiae specifically recognizes the T-rich strand of the core sequence of ARS elements and discriminates against mutant sequences. EMBO J. 1991 Apr;10(4):981–985. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb08032.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Shiomi Y., Powers J., Bolla R. I., Van Nguyen T., Schlessinger D. Proteins and RNA in mouse L cell core nucleoli and nucleolar matrix. Biochemistry. 1986 Sep 23;25(19):5745–5751. doi: 10.1021/bi00367a059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Smith H. C., Berezney R. DNA polymerase alpha is tightly bound to the nuclear matrix of actively replicating liver. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1980 Dec 31;97(4):1541–1547. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(80)80041-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Smith H. C., Rothblum L. I. Ribosomal DNA sequences attached to the nuclear matrix. Biochem Genet. 1987 Dec;25(11-12):863–879. doi: 10.1007/BF00502606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Sperry A. O., Blasquez V. C., Garrard W. T. Dysfunction of chromosomal loop attachment sites: illegitimate recombination linked to matrix association regions and topoisomerase II. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jul;86(14):5497–5501. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.14.5497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Srivastava M., Fleming P. J., Pollard H. B., Burns A. L. Cloning and sequencing of the human nucleolin cDNA. FEBS Lett. 1989 Jun 19;250(1):99–105. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(89)80692-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Stief A., Winter D. M., Strätling W. H., Sippel A. E. A nuclear DNA attachment element mediates elevated and position-independent gene activity. Nature. 1989 Sep 28;341(6240):343–345. doi: 10.1038/341343a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Theunissen O., Rudt F., Guddat U., Mentzel H., Pieler T. RNA and DNA binding zinc fingers in Xenopus TFIIIA. Cell. 1992 Nov 13;71(4):679–690. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90601-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Tsutsui K., Tsutsui K., Okada S., Watarai S., Seki S., Yasuda T., Shohmori T. Identification and characterization of a nuclear scaffold protein that binds the matrix attachment region DNA. J Biol Chem. 1993 Jun 15;268(17):12886–12894. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Vaughn J. P., Dijkwel P. A., Mullenders L. H., Hamlin J. L. Replication forks are associated with the nuclear matrix. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Apr 25;18(8):1965–1969. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.8.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Xing Y., Johnson C. V., Dobner P. R., Lawrence J. B. Higher level organization of individual gene transcription and RNA splicing. Science. 1993 Feb 26;259(5099):1326–1330. doi: 10.1126/science.8446901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Yang-Yen H. F., Rothblum L. I. Partial nucleotide sequence of a 3.4 kb fragment from the rat ribosomal DNA nontranscribed spacer. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Jul 11;14(13):5557–5557. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.13.5557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Zhao K., Käs E., Gonzalez E., Laemmli U. K. SAR-dependent mobilization of histone H1 by HMG-I/Y in vitro: HMG-I/Y is enriched in H1-depleted chromatin. EMBO J. 1993 Aug;12(8):3237–3247. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05993.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. de Lange T. Human telomeres are attached to the nuclear matrix. EMBO J. 1992 Feb;11(2):717–724. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05104.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. von Kries J. P., Buck F., Strätling W. H. Chicken MAR binding protein p120 is identical to human heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) U. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Apr 11;22(7):1215–1220. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.7.1215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. von Kries J. P., Buhrmester H., Strätling W. H. A matrix/scaffold attachment region binding protein: identification, purification, and mode of binding. Cell. 1991 Jan 11;64(1):123–135. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90214-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES