Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1997 May;17(5):2436–2447. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.5.2436

Genetic and biochemical analysis of Msh2p-Msh6p: role of ATP hydrolysis and Msh2p-Msh6p subunit interactions in mismatch base pair recognition.

E Alani 1, T Sokolsky 1, B Studamire 1, J J Miret 1, R S Lahue 1
PMCID: PMC232092  PMID: 9111312

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2p and Msh6p form a complex that specifically binds to DNA containing base pair mismatches. In this study, we performed a genetic and biochemical analysis of the Msh2p-Msh6p complex by introducing point mutations in the ATP binding and putative helix-turn-helix domains of MSH2. The effects of these mutations were analyzed genetically by measuring mutation frequency and biochemically by measuring the stability, mismatch binding activity, and ATPase activity of msh2p (mutant msh2p)-Msh6p complexes. A mutation in the ATP binding domain of MSH2 did not affect the mismatch binding specificity of the msh2p-Msh6p complex; however, this mutation conferred a dominant negative phenotype when the mutant gene was overexpressed in a wild-type strain, and the mutant protein displayed biochemical defects consistent with defects in mismatch repair downstream of mismatch recognition. Helix-turn-helix domain mutant proteins displayed two different properties. One class of mutant proteins was defective in forming complexes with Msh6p and also failed to recognize base pair mismatches. A second class of mutant proteins displayed properties similar to those observed for the ATP binding domain mutant protein. Taken together, these data suggested that the proposed helix-turn-helix domain of Msh2p was unlikely to be involved in mismatch recognition. We propose that the MSH2 helix-turn-helix domain mediates changes in Msh2p-Msh6p interactions that are induced by ATP hydrolysis; the net result of these changes is a modulation of mismatch recognition.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (401.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alani E., Chi N. W., Kolodner R. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 protein specifically binds to duplex oligonucleotides containing mismatched DNA base pairs and insertions. Genes Dev. 1995 Jan 15;9(2):234–247. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.2.234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alani E., Reenan R. A., Kolodner R. D. Interaction between mismatch repair and genetic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1994 May;137(1):19–39. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Au K. G., Welsh K., Modrich P. Initiation of methyl-directed mismatch repair. J Biol Chem. 1992 Jun 15;267(17):12142–12148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Biswas I., Hsieh P. Identification and characterization of a thermostable MutS homolog from Thermus aquaticus. J Biol Chem. 1996 Mar 1;271(9):5040–5048. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.9.5040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bourne H. R. Trimeric G proteins: surprise witness tells a tale. Science. 1995 Nov 10;270(5238):933–934. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5238.933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carey M., Kakidani H., Leatherwood J., Mostashari F., Ptashne M. An amino-terminal fragment of GAL4 binds DNA as a dimer. J Mol Biol. 1989 Oct 5;209(3):423–432. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90007-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chi N. W., Kolodner R. D. Purification and characterization of MSH1, a yeast mitochondrial protein that binds to DNA mismatches. J Biol Chem. 1994 Nov 25;269(47):29984–29992. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chi N. W., Kolodner R. D. The effect of DNA mismatches on the ATPase activity of MSH1, a protein in yeast mitochondria that recognizes DNA mismatches. J Biol Chem. 1994 Nov 25;269(47):29993–29997. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Drummond J. T., Li G. M., Longley M. J., Modrich P. Isolation of an hMSH2-p160 heterodimer that restores DNA mismatch repair to tumor cells. Science. 1995 Jun 30;268(5219):1909–1912. doi: 10.1126/science.7604264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fishel R., Lescoe M. K., Rao M. R., Copeland N. G., Jenkins N. A., Garber J., Kane M., Kolodner R. The human mutator gene homolog MSH2 and its association with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. Cell. 1993 Dec 3;75(5):1027–1038. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90546-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gietz R. D., Schiestl R. H. Applications of high efficiency lithium acetate transformation of intact yeast cells using single-stranded nucleic acids as carrier. Yeast. 1991 Apr;7(3):253–263. doi: 10.1002/yea.320070307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gorbalenya A. E., Koonin E. V. Superfamily of UvrA-related NTP-binding proteins. Implications for rational classification of recombination/repair systems. J Mol Biol. 1990 Jun 20;213(4):583–591. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80243-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Grilley M., Welsh K. M., Su S. S., Modrich P. Isolation and characterization of the Escherichia coli mutL gene product. J Biol Chem. 1989 Jan 15;264(2):1000–1004. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Haber L. T., Pang P. P., Sobell D. I., Mankovich J. A., Walker G. C. Nucleotide sequence of the Salmonella typhimurium mutS gene required for mismatch repair: homology of MutS and HexA of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Bacteriol. 1988 Jan;170(1):197–202. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.1.197-202.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Haber L. T., Walker G. C. Altering the conserved nucleotide binding motif in the Salmonella typhimurium MutS mismatch repair protein affects both its ATPase and mismatch binding activities. EMBO J. 1991 Sep;10(9):2707–2715. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07815.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Habraken Y., Sung P., Prakash L., Prakash S. Binding of insertion/deletion DNA mismatches by the heterodimer of yeast mismatch repair proteins MSH2 and MSH3. Curr Biol. 1996 Sep 1;6(9):1185–1187. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)70686-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ho S. N., Hunt H. D., Horton R. M., Pullen J. K., Pease L. R. Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. Gene. 1989 Apr 15;77(1):51–59. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90358-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hollingsworth N. M., Ponte L., Halsey C. MSH5, a novel MutS homolog, facilitates meiotic reciprocal recombination between homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but not mismatch repair. Genes Dev. 1995 Jul 15;9(14):1728–1739. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.14.1728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hughes M. J., Jiricny J. The purification of a human mismatch-binding protein and identification of its associated ATPase and helicase activities. J Biol Chem. 1992 Nov 25;267(33):23876–23882. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Iaccarino I., Palombo F., Drummond J., Totty N. F., Hsuan J. J., Modrich P., Jiricny J. MSH6, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein that binds to mismatches as a heterodimer with MSH2. Curr Biol. 1996 Apr 1;6(4):484–486. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00516-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jiricny J., Su S. S., Wood S. G., Modrich P. Mismatch-containing oligonucleotide duplexes bound by the E. coli mutS-encoded protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Aug 25;16(16):7843–7853. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.16.7843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnson R. E., Kovvali G. K., Prakash L., Prakash S. Requirement of the yeast MSH3 and MSH6 genes for MSH2-dependent genomic stability. J Biol Chem. 1996 Mar 29;271(13):7285–7288. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.13.7285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kolodner R. D. Mismatch repair: mechanisms and relationship to cancer susceptibility. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995 Oct;20(10):397–401. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)89087-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kolodziej P. A., Young R. A. Epitope tagging and protein surveillance. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:508–519. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94038-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lahue R. S., Au K. G., Modrich P. DNA mismatch correction in a defined system. Science. 1989 Jul 14;245(4914):160–164. doi: 10.1126/science.2665076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Leach F. S., Nicolaides N. C., Papadopoulos N., Liu B., Jen J., Parsons R., Peltomäki P., Sistonen P., Aaltonen L. A., Nyström-Lahti M. Mutations of a mutS homolog in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Cell. 1993 Dec 17;75(6):1215–1225. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90330-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Marsischky G. T., Filosi N., Kane M. F., Kolodner R. Redundancy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH3 and MSH6 in MSH2-dependent mismatch repair. Genes Dev. 1996 Feb 15;10(4):407–420. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.4.407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. McEntee K., Weinstock G. M., Lehman I. R. recA protein-catalyzed strand assimilation: stimulation by Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA-binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Feb;77(2):857–861. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.2.857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Miret J. J., Milla M. G., Lahue R. S. Characterization of a DNA mismatch-binding activity in yeast extracts. J Biol Chem. 1993 Feb 15;268(5):3507–3513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Miret J. J., Parker B. O., Lahua R. S. Recognition of DNA insertion/deletion mismatches by an activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Feb 15;24(4):721–729. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.4.721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Modrich P., Lahue R. Mismatch repair in replication fidelity, genetic recombination, and cancer biology. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:101–133. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.000533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Modrich P. Mechanisms and biological effects of mismatch repair. Annu Rev Genet. 1991;25:229–253. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.25.120191.001305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nag D. K., Petes T. D. Seven-base-pair inverted repeats in DNA form stable hairpins in vivo in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1991 Nov;129(3):669–673. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.3.669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. New L., Liu K., Crouse G. F. The yeast gene MSH3 defines a new class of eukaryotic MutS homologues. Mol Gen Genet. 1993 May;239(1-2):97–108. doi: 10.1007/BF00281607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ohlendorf D. H., Anderson W. F., Matthews B. W. Many gene-regulatory proteins appear to have a similar alpha-helical fold that binds DNA and evolved from a common precursor. J Mol Evol. 1983;19(2):109–114. doi: 10.1007/BF02300748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Pabo C. O., Sauer R. T. Protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 1984;53:293–321. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.53.070184.001453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Palombo F., Gallinari P., Iaccarino I., Lettieri T., Hughes M., D'Arrigo A., Truong O., Hsuan J. J., Jiricny J. GTBP, a 160-kilodalton protein essential for mismatch-binding activity in human cells. Science. 1995 Jun 30;268(5219):1912–1914. doi: 10.1126/science.7604265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Palombo F., Iaccarino I., Nakajima E., Ikejima M., Shimada T., Jiricny J. hMutSbeta, a heterodimer of hMSH2 and hMSH3, binds to insertion/deletion loops in DNA. Curr Biol. 1996 Sep 1;6(9):1181–1184. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)70685-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Parker B. O., Marinus M. G. Repair of DNA heteroduplexes containing small heterologous sequences in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Mar 1;89(5):1730–1734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.5.1730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Prolla T. A., Pang Q., Alani E., Kolodner R. D., Liskay R. M. MLH1, PMS1, and MSH2 interactions during the initiation of DNA mismatch repair in yeast. Science. 1994 Aug 19;265(5175):1091–1093. doi: 10.1126/science.8066446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Reenan R. A., Kolodner R. D. Characterization of insertion mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH1 and MSH2 genes: evidence for separate mitochondrial and nuclear functions. Genetics. 1992 Dec;132(4):975–985. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.4.975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Reenan R. A., Kolodner R. D. Isolation and characterization of two Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes encoding homologs of the bacterial HexA and MutS mismatch repair proteins. Genetics. 1992 Dec;132(4):963–973. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.4.963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ross-Macdonald P., Roeder G. S. Mutation of a meiosis-specific MutS homolog decreases crossing over but not mismatch correction. Cell. 1994 Dec 16;79(6):1069–1080. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90037-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Su S. S., Lahue R. S., Au K. G., Modrich P. Mispair specificity of methyl-directed DNA mismatch correction in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1988 May 15;263(14):6829–6835. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Su S. S., Modrich P. Escherichia coli mutS-encoded protein binds to mismatched DNA base pairs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jul;83(14):5057–5061. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.14.5057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sung P., Higgins D., Prakash L., Prakash S. Mutation of lysine-48 to arginine in the yeast RAD3 protein abolishes its ATPase and DNA helicase activities but not the ability to bind ATP. EMBO J. 1988 Oct;7(10):3263–3269. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03193.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang J., Grossman L. Mutations in the helix-turn-helix motif of the Escherichia coli UvrA protein eliminate its specificity for UV-damaged DNA. J Biol Chem. 1993 Mar 5;268(7):5323–5331. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Welsh K. M., Lu A. L., Clark S., Modrich P. Isolation and characterization of the Escherichia coli mutH gene product. J Biol Chem. 1987 Nov 15;262(32):15624–15629. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Winston F., Dollard C., Ricupero-Hovasse S. L. Construction of a set of convenient Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that are isogenic to S288C. Yeast. 1995 Jan;11(1):53–55. doi: 10.1002/yea.320110107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wissmann A., Baumeister R., Müller G., Hecht B., Helbl V., Pfleiderer K., Hillen W. Amino acids determining operator binding specificity in the helix-turn-helix motif of Tn10 Tet repressor. EMBO J. 1991 Dec;10(13):4145–4152. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04992.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wu T. H., Marinus M. G. Dominant negative mutator mutations in the mutS gene of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1994 Sep;176(17):5393–5400. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.17.5393-5400.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES