Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1997 May;17(5):2920–2932. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.5.2920

Heterodimerization of Msx and Dlx homeoproteins results in functional antagonism.

H Zhang 1, G Hu 1, H Wang 1, P Sciavolino 1, N Iler 1, M M Shen 1, C Abate-Shen 1
PMCID: PMC232144  PMID: 9111364

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions are known to be essential for specifying the transcriptional activities of homeoproteins. Here we show that representative members of the Msx and Dlx homeoprotein families form homo- and heterodimeric complexes. We demonstrate that dimerization by Msx and Dlx proteins is mediated through their homeodomains and that the residues required for this interaction correspond to those necessary for DNA binding. Unlike most other known examples of homeoprotein interactions, association of Msx and Dlx proteins does not promote cooperative DNA binding; instead, dimerization and DNA binding are mutually exclusive activities. In particular, we show that Msx and Dlx proteins interact independently and noncooperatively with homeodomain DNA binding sites and that dimerization is specifically blocked by the presence of such DNA sites. We further demonstrate that the transcriptional properties of Msx and Dlx proteins display reciprocal inhibition. Specifically, Msx proteins act as transcriptional repressors and Dlx proteins act as activators, while in combination, Msx and Dlx proteins counteract each other's transcriptional activities. Finally, we show that the expression patterns of representative Msx and Dlx genes (Msx1, Msx2, Dlx2, and Dlx5) overlap in mouse embryogenesis during limb bud and craniofacial development, consistent with the potential for their protein products to interact in vivo. Based on these observations, we propose that functional antagonism through heterodimer formation provides a mechanism for regulating the transcriptional actions of Msx and Dlx homeoproteins in vivo.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brown J. M., Wedden S. E., Millburn G. H., Robson L. G., Hill R. E., Davidson D. R., Tickle C. Experimental analysis of the control of expression of the homeobox-gene Msx-1 in the developing limb and face. Development. 1993 Sep;119(1):41–48. doi: 10.1242/dev.119.Supplement.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Catron K. M., Iler N., Abate C. Nucleotides flanking a conserved TAAT core dictate the DNA binding specificity of three murine homeodomain proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Apr;13(4):2354–2365. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.4.2354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Catron K. M., Wang H., Hu G., Shen M. M., Abate-Shen C. Comparison of MSX-1 and MSX-2 suggests a molecular basis for functional redundancy. Mech Dev. 1996 Apr;55(2):185–199. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(96)00503-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Catron K. M., Zhang H., Marshall S. C., Inostroza J. A., Wilson J. M., Abate C. Transcriptional repression by Msx-1 does not require homeodomain DNA-binding sites. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Feb;15(2):861–871. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.2.861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chan-Thomas P. S., Thompson R. P., Robert B., Yacoub M. H., Barton P. J. Expression of homeobox genes Msx-1 (Hox-7) and Msx-2 (Hox-8) during cardiac development in the chick. Dev Dyn. 1993 Jul;197(3):203–216. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001970305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cleary M. A., Stern S., Tanaka M., Herr W. Differential positive control by Oct-1 and Oct-2: activation of a transcriptionally silent motif through Oct-1 and VP16 corecruitment. Genes Dev. 1993 Jan;7(1):72–83. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.1.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coelho C. N., Sumoy L., Rodgers B. J., Davidson D. R., Hill R. E., Upholt W. B., Kosher R. A. Expression of the chicken homeobox-containing gene GHox-8 during embryonic chick limb development. Mech Dev. 1991 Jun;34(2-3):143–154. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(91)90051-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davidson D. R., Crawley A., Hill R. E., Tickle C. Position-dependent expression of two related homeobox genes in developing vertebrate limbs. Nature. 1991 Aug 1;352(6334):429–431. doi: 10.1038/352429a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dollé P., Price M., Duboule D. Expression of the murine Dlx-1 homeobox gene during facial, ocular and limb development. Differentiation. 1992 Mar;49(2):93–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1992.tb00773.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ekker M., Akimenko M. A., Bremiller R., Westerfield M. Regional expression of three homeobox transcripts in the inner ear of zebrafish embryos. Neuron. 1992 Jul;9(1):27–35. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90217-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ferrari D., Sumoy L., Gannon J., Sun H., Brown A. M., Upholt W. B., Kosher R. A. The expression pattern of the Distal-less homeobox-containing gene Dlx-5 in the developing chick limb bud suggests its involvement in apical ectodermal ridge activity, pattern formation, and cartilage differentiation. Mech Dev. 1995 Aug;52(2-3):257–264. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(95)98113-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hill R. E., Jones P. F., Rees A. R., Sime C. M., Justice M. J., Copeland N. G., Jenkins N. A., Graham E., Davidson D. R. A new family of mouse homeo box-containing genes: molecular structure, chromosomal location, and developmental expression of Hox-7.1. Genes Dev. 1989 Jan;3(1):26–37. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.1.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Holland P. W. Cloning and evolutionary analysis of msh-like homeobox genes from mouse, zebrafish and ascidian. Gene. 1991 Feb 15;98(2):253–257. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90182-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Huang C. C., Herr W. Differential control of transcription by homologous homeodomain coregulators. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Jun;16(6):2967–2976. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.6.2967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Iler N., Rowitch D. H., Echelard Y., McMahon A. P., Abate-Shen C. A single homeodomain binding site restricts spatial expression of Wnt-1 in the developing brain. Mech Dev. 1995 Sep;53(1):87–96. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(95)00427-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jowett A. K., Vainio S., Ferguson M. W., Sharpe P. T., Thesleff I. Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions are required for msx 1 and msx 2 gene expression in the developing murine molar tooth. Development. 1993 Feb;117(2):461–470. doi: 10.1242/dev.117.2.461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lai J. S., Cleary M. A., Herr W. A single amino acid exchange transfers VP16-induced positive control from the Oct-1 to the Oct-2 homeo domain. Genes Dev. 1992 Nov;6(11):2058–2065. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.11.2058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lai J. S., Herr W. Ethidium bromide provides a simple tool for identifying genuine DNA-independent protein associations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Aug 1;89(15):6958–6962. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.15.6958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lichtsteiner S., Tjian R. Synergistic activation of transcription by UNC-86 and MEC-3 in Caenorhabditis elegans embryo extracts. EMBO J. 1995 Aug 15;14(16):3937–3945. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00065.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lyons G. E., Houzelstein D., Sassoon D., Robert B., Buckingham M. E. Multiple sites of Hox-7 expression during mouse embryogenesis: comparison with retinoic acid receptor mRNA localization. Mol Reprod Dev. 1992 Aug;32(4):303–314. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1080320402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. MacKenzie A., Ferguson M. W., Sharpe P. T. Hox-7 expression during murine craniofacial development. Development. 1991 Oct;113(2):601–611. doi: 10.1242/dev.113.2.601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mann R. S., Chan S. K. Extra specificity from extradenticle: the partnership between HOX and PBX/EXD homeodomain proteins. Trends Genet. 1996 Jul;12(7):258–262. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(96)10026-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Monaghan A. P., Davidson D. R., Sime C., Graham E., Baldock R., Bhattacharya S. S., Hill R. E. The Msh-like homeobox genes define domains in the developing vertebrate eye. Development. 1991 Aug;112(4):1053–1061. doi: 10.1242/dev.112.4.1053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pavlova A., Boutin E., Cunha G., Sassoon D. Msx1 (Hox-7.1) in the adult mouse uterus: cellular interactions underlying regulation of expression. Development. 1994 Feb;120(2):335–345. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.2.335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Porteus M. H., Bulfone A., Ciaranello R. D., Rubenstein J. L. Isolation and characterization of a novel cDNA clone encoding a homeodomain that is developmentally regulated in the ventral forebrain. Neuron. 1991 Aug;7(2):221–229. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90260-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Qiu M., Bulfone A., Martinez S., Meneses J. J., Shimamura K., Pedersen R. A., Rubenstein J. L. Null mutation of Dlx-2 results in abnormal morphogenesis of proximal first and second branchial arch derivatives and abnormal differentiation in the forebrain. Genes Dev. 1995 Oct 15;9(20):2523–2538. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.20.2523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Reginelli A. D., Wang Y. Q., Sassoon D., Muneoka K. Digit tip regeneration correlates with regions of Msx1 (Hox 7) expression in fetal and newborn mice. Development. 1995 Apr;121(4):1065–1076. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.4.1065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Robert B., Lyons G., Simandl B. K., Kuroiwa A., Buckingham M. The apical ectodermal ridge regulates Hox-7 and Hox-8 gene expression in developing chick limb buds. Genes Dev. 1991 Dec;5(12B):2363–2374. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.12b.2363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Robert B., Sassoon D., Jacq B., Gehring W., Buckingham M. Hox-7, a mouse homeobox gene with a novel pattern of expression during embryogenesis. EMBO J. 1989 Jan;8(1):91–100. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03352.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Satokata I., Maas R. Msx1 deficient mice exhibit cleft palate and abnormalities of craniofacial and tooth development. Nat Genet. 1994 Apr;6(4):348–356. doi: 10.1038/ng0494-348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Shimeld S. M., McKay I. J., Sharpe P. T. The murine homeobox gene Msx-3 shows highly restricted expression in the developing neural tube. Mech Dev. 1996 Apr;55(2):201–210. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(96)00505-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Simon H. G., Nelson C., Goff D., Laufer E., Morgan B. A., Tabin C. Differential expression of myogenic regulatory genes and Msx-1 during dedifferentiation and redifferentiation of regenerating amphibian limbs. Dev Dyn. 1995 Jan;202(1):1–12. doi: 10.1002/aja.1002020102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Song K., Wang Y., Sassoon D. Expression of Hox-7.1 in myoblasts inhibits terminal differentiation and induces cell transformation. Nature. 1992 Dec 3;360(6403):477–481. doi: 10.1038/360477a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Spicer D. B., Rhee J., Cheung W. L., Lassar A. B. Inhibition of myogenic bHLH and MEF2 transcription factors by the bHLH protein Twist. Science. 1996 Jun 7;272(5267):1476–1480. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5267.1476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Taggart A. K., Pugh B. F. Dimerization of TFIID when not bound to DNA. Science. 1996 May 31;272(5266):1331–1333. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5266.1331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang Y., Sassoon D. Ectoderm-mesenchyme and mesenchyme-mesenchyme interactions regulate Msx-1 expression and cellular differentiation in the murine limb bud. Dev Biol. 1995 Apr;168(2):374–382. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1995.1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wilson D., Sheng G., Lecuit T., Dostatni N., Desplan C. Cooperative dimerization of paired class homeo domains on DNA. Genes Dev. 1993 Nov;7(11):2120–2134. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.11.2120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Woloshin P., Song K., Degnin C., Killary A. M., Goldhamer D. J., Sassoon D., Thayer M. J. MSX1 inhibits myoD expression in fibroblast x 10T1/2 cell hybrids. Cell. 1995 Aug 25;82(4):611–620. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90033-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Xue D., Tu Y., Chalfie M. Cooperative interactions between the Caenorhabditis elegans homeoproteins UNC-86 and MEC-3. Science. 1993 Sep 3;261(5126):1324–1328. doi: 10.1126/science.8103239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zappavigna V., Sartori D., Mavilio F. Specificity of HOX protein function depends on DNA-protein and protein-protein interactions, both mediated by the homeo domain. Genes Dev. 1994 Mar 15;8(6):732–744. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.6.732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang H., Catron K. M., Abate-Shen C. A role for the Msx-1 homeodomain in transcriptional regulation: residues in the N-terminal arm mediate TATA binding protein interaction and transcriptional repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Mar 5;93(5):1764–1769. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.5.1764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES