Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1997 Jun;17(6):3173–3180. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.6.3173

Prebending the estrogen response element destabilizes binding of the estrogen receptor DNA binding domain.

J Kim 1, G de Haan 1, A M Nardulli 1, D J Shapiro 1
PMCID: PMC232170  PMID: 9154816

Abstract

Binding of many eukaryotic transcription regulatory proteins to their DNA recognition sequences results in conformational changes in DNA. To test the effect of altering DNA topology by prebending a transcription factor binding site, we examined the interaction of the estrogen receptor (ER) DNA binding domain (DBD) with prebent estrogen response elements (EREs). When the ERE in minicircle DNA was prebent toward the major groove, which is in the same direction as the ER-induced DNA bend, there was no significant effect on ER DBD binding relative to the linear counterparts. However, when the ERE was bent toward the minor groove, in a direction that opposes the ER-induced DNA bend, there was a four- to eightfold reduction in ER DBD binding. Since reduced binding was also observed with the ERE in nicked circles, the reduction in binding was not due to torsional force induced by binding of ER DBD to the prebent ERE in covalently closed minicircles. To determine the mechanism responsible for reduced binding to the prebent ERE, we examined the effect of prebending the ERE on the association and dissociation of the ER DBD. Binding of the ER DBD to ERE-containing minicircles was rapid when the EREs were prebent toward either the major or minor groove of the DNA (k(on) of 9.9 x 10(6) to 1.7 x 10(7) M(-1) s(-1)). Prebending the ERE toward the minor groove resulted in an increase in k(off) of four- to fivefold. Increased dissociation of the ER DBD from the ERE is, therefore, the major factor responsible for reduced binding of the ER DBD to an ERE prebent toward the minor groove. These data provide the first direct demonstration that the interaction of a eukaryotic transcription factor with its recognition sequence can be strongly influenced by altering DNA topology through prebending the DNA.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (984.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bazett-Jones D. P., Leblanc B., Herfort M., Moss T. Short-range DNA looping by the Xenopus HMG-box transcription factor, xUBF. Science. 1994 May 20;264(5162):1134–1137. doi: 10.1126/science.8178172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chang T. C., Nardulli A. M., Lew D., Shapiro D. J. The role of estrogen response elements in expression of the Xenopus laevis vitellogenin B1 gene. Mol Endocrinol. 1992 Mar;6(3):346–354. doi: 10.1210/mend.6.3.1584211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chiang C. M., Roeder R. G. Expression and purification of general transcription factors by FLAG epitope-tagging and peptide elution. Pept Res. 1993 Mar-Apr;6(2):62–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Du W., Thanos D., Maniatis T. Mechanisms of transcriptional synergism between distinct virus-inducible enhancer elements. Cell. 1993 Sep 10;74(5):887–898. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90468-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Döbbeling U., Ross K., Klein-Hitpass L., Morley C., Wagner U., Ryffel G. U. A cell-specific activator in the Xenopus A2 vitellogenin gene: promoter elements functioning with rat liver nuclear extracts. EMBO J. 1988 Aug;7(8):2495–2501. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03096.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Giese K., Cox J., Grosschedl R. The HMG domain of lymphoid enhancer factor 1 bends DNA and facilitates assembly of functional nucleoprotein structures. Cell. 1992 Apr 3;69(1):185–195. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90129-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hoopes B. C., LeBlanc J. F., Hawley D. K. Kinetic analysis of yeast TFIID-TATA box complex formation suggests a multi-step pathway. J Biol Chem. 1992 Jun 5;267(16):11539–11547. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Horikoshi M., Bertuccioli C., Takada R., Wang J., Yamamoto T., Roeder R. G. Transcription factor TFIID induces DNA bending upon binding to the TATA element. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Feb 1;89(3):1060–1064. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.3.1060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kahn J. D., Crothers D. M. DNA bending in transcription initiation. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1993;58:115–122. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1993.058.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kahn J. D., Crothers D. M. Protein-induced bending and DNA cyclization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jul 15;89(14):6343–6347. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.14.6343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kim J. L., Nikolov D. B., Burley S. K. Co-crystal structure of TBP recognizing the minor groove of a TATA element. Nature. 1993 Oct 7;365(6446):520–527. doi: 10.1038/365520a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kim J., Klooster S., Shapiro D. J. Intrinsically bent DNA in a eukaryotic transcription factor recognition sequence potentiates transcription activation. J Biol Chem. 1995 Jan 20;270(3):1282–1288. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.3.1282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim J., Shapiro D. J. In simple synthetic promoters YY1-induced DNA bending is important in transcription activation and repression. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Nov 1;24(21):4341–4348. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.21.4341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim J., de Haan G., Shapiro D. J. DNA bending between upstream activator sequences increases transcriptional synergy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996 Sep 24;226(3):638–644. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1996.1408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim Y., Geiger J. H., Hahn S., Sigler P. B. Crystal structure of a yeast TBP/TATA-box complex. Nature. 1993 Oct 7;365(6446):512–520. doi: 10.1038/365512a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Klein-Hitpass L., Tsai S. Y., Greene G. L., Clark J. H., Tsai M. J., O'Malley B. W. Specific binding of estrogen receptor to the estrogen response element. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Jan;9(1):43–49. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.1.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Koo H. S., Drak J., Rice J. A., Crothers D. M. Determination of the extent of DNA bending by an adenine-thymine tract. Biochemistry. 1990 May 1;29(17):4227–4234. doi: 10.1021/bi00469a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kornberg R. D. RNA polymerase II transcription control. Trends Biochem Sci. 1996 Sep;21(9):325–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee J. H., Kim J., Shapiro D. J. Regulation of Xenopus laevis estrogen receptor gene expression is mediated by an estrogen response element in the protein coding region. DNA Cell Biol. 1995 May;14(5):419–430. doi: 10.1089/dna.1995.14.419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lu X. P., Eberhardt N. L., Pfahl M. DNA bending by retinoid X receptor-containing retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor complexes. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Oct;13(10):6509–6519. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.10.6509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mader S., Chambon P., White J. H. Defining a minimal estrogen receptor DNA binding domain. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Mar 11;21(5):1125–1132. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.5.1125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mangelsdorf D. J., Thummel C., Beato M., Herrlich P., Schütz G., Umesono K., Blumberg B., Kastner P., Mark M., Chambon P. The nuclear receptor superfamily: the second decade. Cell. 1995 Dec 15;83(6):835–839. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90199-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Martinez E., Wahli W. Cooperative binding of estrogen receptor to imperfect estrogen-responsive DNA elements correlates with their synergistic hormone-dependent enhancer activity. EMBO J. 1989 Dec 1;8(12):3781–3791. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08555.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. McBroom L. D., Flock G., Giguère V. The nonconserved hinge region and distinct amino-terminal domains of the ROR alpha orphan nuclear receptor isoforms are required for proper DNA bending and ROR alpha-DNA interactions. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Feb;15(2):796–808. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.2.796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McKnight S. L. Transcription revisited: a commentary on the 1995 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory meeting, "Mechanisms of Eukaryotic Transcription". Genes Dev. 1996 Feb 15;10(4):367–381. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.4.367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nardulli A. M., Greene G. L., Shapiro D. J. Human estrogen receptor bound to an estrogen response element bends DNA. Mol Endocrinol. 1993 Mar;7(3):331–340. doi: 10.1210/mend.7.3.8483477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nardulli A. M., Grobner C., Cotter D. Estrogen receptor-induced DNA bending: orientation of the bend and replacement of an estrogen response element with an intrinsic DNA bending sequence. Mol Endocrinol. 1995 Aug;9(8):1064–1076. doi: 10.1210/mend.9.8.7476980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nardulli A. M., Lew D., Erijman L., Shapiro D. J. Purified estrogen receptor DNA binding domain expressed in Escherichia coli activates transcription of an estrogen-responsive promoter in cultured cells. J Biol Chem. 1991 Dec 15;266(35):24070–24076. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nardulli A. M., Shapiro D. J. Binding of the estrogen receptor DNA-binding domain to the estrogen response element induces DNA bending. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 May;12(5):2037–2042. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.5.2037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Natesan S., Gilman M. Z. DNA bending and orientation-dependent function of YY1 in the c-fos promoter. Genes Dev. 1993 Dec;7(12B):2497–2509. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.12b.2497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Oñate S. A., Prendergast P., Wagner J. P., Nissen M., Reeves R., Pettijohn D. E., Edwards D. P. The DNA-bending protein HMG-1 enhances progesterone receptor binding to its target DNA sequences. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 May;14(5):3376–3391. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.5.3376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Parvin J. D., McCormick R. J., Sharp P. A., Fisher D. E. Pre-bending of a promoter sequence enhances affinity for the TATA-binding factor. Nature. 1995 Feb 23;373(6516):724–727. doi: 10.1038/373724a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Piña B., Brüggemeier U., Beato M. Nucleosome positioning modulates accessibility of regulatory proteins to the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Cell. 1990 Mar 9;60(5):719–731. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90087-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ponglikitmongkol M., White J. H., Chambon P. Synergistic activation of transcription by the human estrogen receptor bound to tandem responsive elements. EMBO J. 1990 Jul;9(7):2221–2231. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07392.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Prendergast P., Pan Z., Edwards D. P. Progesterone receptor-induced bending of its target DNA: distinct effects of the A and B receptor forms. Mol Endocrinol. 1996 Apr;10(4):393–407. doi: 10.1210/mend.10.4.8721984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Schild C., Claret F. X., Wahli W., Wolffe A. P. A nucleosome-dependent static loop potentiates estrogen-regulated transcription from the Xenopus vitellogenin B1 promoter in vitro. EMBO J. 1993 Feb;12(2):423–433. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05674.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Schwabe J. W., Chapman L., Finch J. T., Rhodes D. The crystal structure of the estrogen receptor DNA-binding domain bound to DNA: how receptors discriminate between their response elements. Cell. 1993 Nov 5;75(3):567–578. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90390-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Schwabe J. W., Neuhaus D., Rhodes D. Solution structure of the DNA-binding domain of the oestrogen receptor. Nature. 1990 Nov 29;348(6300):458–461. doi: 10.1038/348458a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Shulemovich K., Dimaculangan D. D., Katz D., Lazar M. A. DNA bending by thyroid hormone receptor: influence of half-site spacing and RXR. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Mar 11;23(5):811–818. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.5.811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Starr D. B., Hoopes B. C., Hawley D. K. DNA bending is an important component of site-specific recognition by the TATA binding protein. J Mol Biol. 1995 Jul 21;250(4):434–446. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Struhl K. Duality of TBP, the universal transcription factor. Science. 1994 Feb 25;263(5150):1103–1104. doi: 10.1126/science.8108728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Studier F. W., Moffatt B. A. Use of bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase to direct selective high-level expression of cloned genes. J Mol Biol. 1986 May 5;189(1):113–130. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90385-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. TenHarmsel A., Biggin M. D. Bending DNA can repress a eukaryotic basal promoter and inhibit TFIID binding. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Oct;15(10):5492–5498. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.10.5492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhuang Y., Katzenellenbogen B. S., Shapiro D. J. Estrogen receptor mutants which do not bind 17 beta-estradiol dimerize and bind to the estrogen response element in vivo. Mol Endocrinol. 1995 Apr;9(4):457–466. doi: 10.1210/mend.9.4.7659089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zinkel S. S., Crothers D. M. DNA bend direction by phase sensitive detection. Nature. 1987 Jul 9;328(6126):178–181. doi: 10.1038/328178a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. van der Vliet P. C., Verrijzer C. P. Bending of DNA by transcription factors. Bioessays. 1993 Jan;15(1):25–32. doi: 10.1002/bies.950150105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES