Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1997 Jul;17(7):3469–3476. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.7.3469

The branchpoint residue is recognized during commitment complex formation before being bulged out of the U2 snRNA-pre-mRNA duplex.

E Pascolo 1, B Séraphin 1
PMCID: PMC232200  PMID: 9199282

Abstract

We have analyzed the mechanism of branchpoint nucleotide selection during the first step of pre-mRNA splicing. It has previously been proposed that the branchpoint is selected as an adenosine residue bulged out of an RNA helix formed by the U2 snRNA-pre-mRNA base pairing. Although compatible with this bulge hypothesis, available data from both yeast and mammalian systems did not rule out alternative structures for the branch nucleotide. Mutating the residue preceding the branchpoint nucleotide in our reporter construct conferred a splicing defect that was suppressed in vivo by the complementary U2 snRNA mutants. In contrast, substitutions on the 3' side of the branchpoint could be suppressed by complementary U2 snRNA mutants only in a weakened intron context. To test why the identity of the branch nucleotide was important for its selection, we analyzed the effect of substitutions at this position on spliceosome assembly. We observed that these mutations block the formation of one of the two commitment complexes. Our results demonstrate that yeast branchpoint selection occurs in multiple steps. The nature of the branch residue is recognized, in the absence of U2 snRNA, during commitment complex formation. Then, base pairing with U2 snRNA constrains this residue into a bulge conformation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abovich N., Liao X. C., Rosbash M. The yeast MUD2 protein: an interaction with PRP11 defines a bridge between commitment complexes and U2 snRNP addition. Genes Dev. 1994 Apr 1;8(7):843–854. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.7.843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ares M., Jr U2 RNA from yeast is unexpectedly large and contains homology to vertebrate U4, U5, and U6 small nuclear RNAs. Cell. 1986 Oct 10;47(1):49–59. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90365-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brody E., Abelson J. The "spliceosome": yeast pre-messenger RNA associates with a 40S complex in a splicing-dependent reaction. Science. 1985 May 24;228(4702):963–967. doi: 10.1126/science.3890181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chiara M. D., Gozani O., Bennett M., Champion-Arnaud P., Palandjian L., Reed R. Identification of proteins that interact with exon sequences, splice sites, and the branchpoint sequence during each stage of spliceosome assembly. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Jul;16(7):3317–3326. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.7.3317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Couto J. R., Tamm J., Parker R., Guthrie C. A trans-acting suppressor restores splicing of a yeast intron with a branch point mutation. Genes Dev. 1987 Jul;1(5):445–455. doi: 10.1101/gad.1.5.445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fouser L. A., Friesen J. D. Mutations in a yeast intron demonstrate the importance of specific conserved nucleotides for the two stages of nuclear mRNA splicing. Cell. 1986 Apr 11;45(1):81–93. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90540-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gaur R. K., Valcárcel J., Green M. R. Sequential recognition of the pre-mRNA branch point by U2AF65 and a novel spliceosome-associated 28-kDa protein. RNA. 1995 Jun;1(4):407–417. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goguel V., Liao X. L., Rymond B. C., Rosbash M. U1 snRNP can influence 3'-splice site selection as well as 5'-splice site selection. Genes Dev. 1991 Aug;5(8):1430–1438. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.8.1430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grabowski P. J., Seiler S. R., Sharp P. A. A multicomponent complex is involved in the splicing of messenger RNA precursors. Cell. 1985 Aug;42(1):345–353. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80130-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grabowski P. J., Sharp P. A. Affinity chromatography of splicing complexes: U2, U5, and U4 + U6 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles in the spliceosome. Science. 1986 Sep 19;233(4770):1294–1299. doi: 10.1126/science.3638792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Guarente L., Yocum R. R., Gifford P. A GAL10-CYC1 hybrid yeast promoter identifies the GAL4 regulatory region as an upstream site. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Dec;79(23):7410–7414. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.23.7410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jacquier A., Rodriguez J. R., Rosbash M. A quantitative analysis of the effects of 5' junction and TACTAAC box mutants and mutant combinations on yeast mRNA splicing. Cell. 1985 Dec;43(2 Pt 1):423–430. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90172-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jacquier A., Rosbash M. RNA splicing and intron turnover are greatly diminished by a mutant yeast branch point. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Aug;83(16):5835–5839. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.16.5835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kalogeropoulos A. Automatic intron detection in nuclear DNA sequences of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1995 May;11(6):555–565. doi: 10.1002/yea.320110605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kandels-Lewis S., Séraphin B. Involvement of U6 snRNA in 5' splice site selection. Science. 1993 Dec 24;262(5142):2035–2039. doi: 10.1126/science.8266100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Konarska M. M., Sharp P. A. Electrophoretic separation of complexes involved in the splicing of precursors to mRNAs. Cell. 1986 Sep 12;46(6):845–855. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90066-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Krämer A. The structure and function of proteins involved in mammalian pre-mRNA splicing. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:367–409. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.002055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kunkel T. A. Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jan;82(2):488–492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.2.488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lesser C. F., Guthrie C. Mutations in U6 snRNA that alter splice site specificity: implications for the active site. Science. 1993 Dec 24;262(5142):1982–1988. doi: 10.1126/science.8266093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Liao X. C., Colot H. V., Wang Y., Rosbash M. Requirements for U2 snRNP addition to yeast pre-mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Aug 25;20(16):4237–4245. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.16.4237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. MacMillan A. M., Query C. C., Allerson C. R., Chen S., Verdine G. L., Sharp P. A. Dynamic association of proteins with the pre-mRNA branch region. Genes Dev. 1994 Dec 15;8(24):3008–3020. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.24.3008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Madhani H. D., Guthrie C. A novel base-pairing interaction between U2 and U6 snRNAs suggests a mechanism for the catalytic activation of the spliceosome. Cell. 1992 Nov 27;71(5):803–817. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90556-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mann C., Buhler J. M., Treich I., Sentenac A. RPC40, a unique gene for a subunit shared between yeast RNA polymerases A and C. Cell. 1987 Feb 27;48(4):627–637. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90241-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McPheeters D. S., Abelson J. Mutational analysis of the yeast U2 snRNA suggests a structural similarity to the catalytic core of group I introns. Cell. 1992 Nov 27;71(5):819–831. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90557-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Michel F., Umesono K., Ozeki H. Comparative and functional anatomy of group II catalytic introns--a review. Gene. 1989 Oct 15;82(1):5–30. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90026-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Miraglia L., Seiwert S., Igel A. H., Ares M., Jr Limited functional equivalence of phylogenetic variation in small nuclear RNA: yeast U2 RNA with altered branchpoint complementarity inhibits splicing and produces a dominant lethal phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Aug 15;88(16):7061–7065. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.16.7061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nelson K. K., Green M. R. Mammalian U2 snRNP has a sequence-specific RNA-binding activity. Genes Dev. 1989 Oct;3(10):1562–1571. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.10.1562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Newman A. J., Norman C. U5 snRNA interacts with exon sequences at 5' and 3' splice sites. Cell. 1992 Feb 21;68(4):743–754. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90149-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nilsen T. W. RNA-RNA interactions in the spliceosome: unraveling the ties that bind. Cell. 1994 Jul 15;78(1):1–4. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90563-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Parker R., Siliciano P. G., Guthrie C. Recognition of the TACTAAC box during mRNA splicing in yeast involves base pairing to the U2-like snRNA. Cell. 1987 Apr 24;49(2):229–239. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90564-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pikielny C. W., Rosbash M. Specific small nuclear RNAs are associated with yeast spliceosomes. Cell. 1986 Jun 20;45(6):869–877. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90561-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pikielny C. W., Rymond B. C., Rosbash M. Electrophoresis of ribonucleoproteins reveals an ordered assembly pathway of yeast splicing complexes. 1986 Nov 27-Dec 3Nature. 324(6095):341–345. doi: 10.1038/324341a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Query C. C., Moore M. J., Sharp P. A. Branch nucleophile selection in pre-mRNA splicing: evidence for the bulged duplex model. Genes Dev. 1994 Mar 1;8(5):587–597. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.5.587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Query C. C., Strobel S. A., Sharp P. A. Three recognition events at the branch-site adenine. EMBO J. 1996 Mar 15;15(6):1392–1402. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Reed R., Maniatis T. The role of the mammalian branchpoint sequence in pre-mRNA splicing. Genes Dev. 1988 Oct;2(10):1268–1276. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.10.1268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rosbash M., Séraphin B. Who's on first? The U1 snRNP-5' splice site interaction and splicing. Trends Biochem Sci. 1991 May;16(5):187–190. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(91)90073-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Seraphin B., Rosbash M. Identification of functional U1 snRNA-pre-mRNA complexes committed to spliceosome assembly and splicing. Cell. 1989 Oct 20;59(2):349–358. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90296-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sherman F. Getting started with yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:3–21. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94004-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Siliciano P. G., Guthrie C. 5' splice site selection in yeast: genetic alterations in base-pairing with U1 reveal additional requirements. Genes Dev. 1988 Oct;2(10):1258–1267. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.10.1258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Stephens R. M., Schneider T. D. Features of spliceosome evolution and function inferred from an analysis of the information at human splice sites. J Mol Biol. 1992 Dec 20;228(4):1124–1136. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90320-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Séraphin B., Kandels-Lewis S. 3' splice site recognition in S. cerevisiae does not require base pairing with U1 snRNA. Cell. 1993 May 21;73(4):803–812. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90258-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Séraphin B., Kretzner L., Rosbash M. A U1 snRNA:pre-mRNA base pairing interaction is required early in yeast spliceosome assembly but does not uniquely define the 5' cleavage site. EMBO J. 1988 Aug;7(8):2533–2538. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03101.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Séraphin B., Rosbash M. Exon mutations uncouple 5' splice site selection from U1 snRNA pairing. Cell. 1990 Nov 2;63(3):619–629. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90457-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Séraphin B., Rosbash M. Mutational analysis of the interactions between U1 small nuclear RNA and pre-mRNA of yeast. Gene. 1989 Oct 15;82(1):145–151. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90039-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Séraphin B., Rosbash M. The yeast branchpoint sequence is not required for the formation of a stable U1 snRNA-pre-mRNA complex and is recognized in the absence of U2 snRNA. EMBO J. 1991 May;10(5):1209–1216. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb08062.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Teem J. L., Rosbash M. Expression of a beta-galactosidase gene containing the ribosomal protein 51 intron is sensitive to the rna2 mutation of yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jul;80(14):4403–4407. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.14.4403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Vijayraghavan U., Parker R., Tamm J., Iimura Y., Rossi J., Abelson J., Guthrie C. Mutations in conserved intron sequences affect multiple steps in the yeast splicing pathway, particularly assembly of the spliceosome. EMBO J. 1986 Jul;5(7):1683–1695. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04412.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Woolford J. L., Jr Nuclear pre-mRNA splicing in yeast. Yeast. 1989 Nov-Dec;5(6):439–457. doi: 10.1002/yea.320050604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wu J., Manley J. L. Mammalian pre-mRNA branch site selection by U2 snRNP involves base pairing. Genes Dev. 1989 Oct;3(10):1553–1561. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.10.1553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhuang Y. A., Goldstein A. M., Weiner A. M. UACUAAC is the preferred branch site for mammalian mRNA splicing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Apr;86(8):2752–2756. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.8.2752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhuang Y., Weiner A. M. A compensatory base change in U1 snRNA suppresses a 5' splice site mutation. Cell. 1986 Sep 12;46(6):827–835. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90064-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhuang Y., Weiner A. M. A compensatory base change in human U2 snRNA can suppress a branch site mutation. Genes Dev. 1989 Oct;3(10):1545–1552. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.10.1545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES