Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1997 Jul;17(7):3799–3808. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.7.3799

Molecular architecture of the hsp70 promoter after deletion of the TATA box or the upstream regulation region.

J A Weber 1, D J Taxman 1, Q Lu 1, D S Gilmour 1
PMCID: PMC232231  PMID: 9199313

Abstract

GAGA factor, TFIID, and paused polymerase are present on the hsp70 promoter in Drosophila melanogaster prior to transcriptional activation. In order to investigate the interplay between these components, mutant constructs were analyzed after they had been transformed into flies on P elements. One construct lacked the TATA box and the other lacked the upstream regulatory region where GAGA factor binds. Transcription of each mutant during heat shock was at least 50-fold less than that of a normal promoter construct. Before and after heat shock, both mutant promoters were found to adopt a DNase I hypersensitive state that included the region downstream from the transcription start site. High-resolution analysis of the DNase I cutting pattern identified proteins that could be contributing to the hypersensitivity. GAGA factor footprints were clearly evident in the upstream region of the TATA deletion construct, and a partial footprint possibly caused by TFIID was evident on the TATA box of the upstream deletion construct. Permanganate treatment of intact salivary glands was used to further characterize each promoter construct. Paused polymerase and TFIID were readily detected on the normal promoter construct, whereas both deletions exhibited reduced levels of each of these factors. Hence both the TATA box and the upstream region are required to efficiently recruit TFIID and a paused polymerase to the promoter prior to transcriptional activation. In contrast, GAGA factor appears to be capable of binding and establishing a DNase I hypersensitive region in the absence of TFIID and polymerase. Interestingly, purified GAGA factor was found to bind near the transcription start site, and the strength of this interaction was increased by the presence of the upstream region. GAGA factor alone might be capable of establishing an open chromatin structure that encompasses the upstream regulatory region as well as the core promoter region, thus facilitating the binding of TFIID.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blau J., Xiao H., McCracken S., O'Hare P., Greenblatt J., Bentley D. Three functional classes of transcriptional activation domain. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 May;16(5):2044–2055. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.5.2044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brand A. H., Perrimon N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development. 1993 Jun;118(2):401–415. doi: 10.1242/dev.118.2.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chi T., Lieberman P., Ellwood K., Carey M. A general mechanism for transcriptional synergy by eukaryotic activators. Nature. 1995 Sep 21;377(6546):254–257. doi: 10.1038/377254a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Choy B., Green M. R. Eukaryotic activators function during multiple steps of preinitiation complex assembly. Nature. 1993 Dec 9;366(6455):531–536. doi: 10.1038/366531a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Emanuel P. A., Gilmour D. S. Transcription factor TFIID recognizes DNA sequences downstream of the TATA element in the Hsp70 heat shock gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Sep 15;90(18):8449–8453. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.18.8449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Giardina C., Lis J. T. Polymerase processivity and termination on Drosophila heat shock genes. J Biol Chem. 1993 Nov 15;268(32):23806–23811. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Giardina C., Pérez-Riba M., Lis J. T. Promoter melting and TFIID complexes on Drosophila genes in vivo. Genes Dev. 1992 Nov;6(11):2190–2200. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.11.2190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gilmour D. S., Dietz T. J., Elgin S. C. TATA box-dependent protein-DNA interactions are detected on heat shock and histone gene promoters in nuclear extracts derived from Drosophila melanogaster embryos. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Aug;8(8):3204–3214. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.8.3204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gilmour D. S., Thomas G. H., Elgin S. C. Drosophila nuclear proteins bind to regions of alternating C and T residues in gene promoters. Science. 1989 Sep 29;245(4925):1487–1490. doi: 10.1126/science.2781290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodrich J. A., Tjian R. TBP-TAF complexes: selectivity factors for eukaryotic transcription. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;6(3):403–409. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90033-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hiromi Y., Gehring W. J. Regulation and function of the Drosophila segmentation gene fushi tarazu. Cell. 1987 Sep 11;50(6):963–974. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90523-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hoch M., Schröder C., Seifert E., Jäckle H. cis-acting control elements for Krüppel expression in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 1990 Aug;9(8):2587–2595. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07440.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jackson J. R., Benyajati C. In vivo stage- and tissue-specific DNA-protein interactions at the D. melanogaster alcohol dehydrogenase distal promoter and adult enhancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Oct 25;20(20):5413–5422. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.20.5413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kobayashi N., Boyer T. G., Berk A. J. A class of activation domains interacts directly with TFIIA and stimulates TFIIA-TFIID-promoter complex assembly. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Nov;15(11):6465–6473. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.11.6465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kwon H., Imbalzano A. N., Khavari P. A., Kingston R. E., Green M. R. Nucleosome disruption and enhancement of activator binding by a human SW1/SNF complex. Nature. 1994 Aug 11;370(6489):477–481. doi: 10.1038/370477a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Laney J. D., Biggin M. D. Redundant control of Ultrabithorax by zeste involves functional levels of zeste protein binding at the Ultrabithorax promoter. Development. 1996 Jul;122(7):2303–2311. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.7.2303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee H., Kraus K. W., Wolfner M. F., Lis J. T. DNA sequence requirements for generating paused polymerase at the start of hsp70. Genes Dev. 1992 Feb;6(2):284–295. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.2.284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Li B., Weber J. A., Chen Y., Greenleaf A. L., Gilmour D. S. Analyses of promoter-proximal pausing by RNA polymerase II on the hsp70 heat shock gene promoter in a Drosophila nuclear extract. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Oct;16(10):5433–5443. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.10.5433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lis J., Wu C. Protein traffic on the heat shock promoter: parking, stalling, and trucking along. Cell. 1993 Jul 16;74(1):1–4. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90286-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McGhee J. D., Felsenfeld G. Reaction of nucleosome DNA with dimethyl sulfate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 May;76(5):2133–2137. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.5.2133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McHugh P. J., Knowland J. Novel reagents for chemical cleavage at abasic sites and UV photoproducts in DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 May 25;23(10):1664–1670. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.10.1664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. O'Brien T., Wilkins R. C., Giardina C., Lis J. T. Distribution of GAGA protein on Drosophila genes in vivo. Genes Dev. 1995 May 1;9(9):1098–1110. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.9.1098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Owen-Hughes T., Utley R. T., Côté J., Peterson C. L., Workman J. L. Persistent site-specific remodeling of a nucleosome array by transient action of the SWI/SNF complex. Science. 1996 Jul 26;273(5274):513–516. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5274.513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Purnell B. A., Emanuel P. A., Gilmour D. S. TFIID sequence recognition of the initiator and sequences farther downstream in Drosophila class II genes. Genes Dev. 1994 Apr 1;8(7):830–842. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.7.830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rasmussen E. B., Lis J. T. Short transcripts of the ternary complex provide insight into RNA polymerase II elongational pausing. J Mol Biol. 1995 Oct 6;252(5):522–535. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rubin G. M., Spradling A. C. Genetic transformation of Drosophila with transposable element vectors. Science. 1982 Oct 22;218(4570):348–353. doi: 10.1126/science.6289436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shopland L. S., Hirayoshi K., Fernandes M., Lis J. T. HSF access to heat shock elements in vivo depends critically on promoter architecture defined by GAGA factor, TFIID, and RNA polymerase II binding sites. Genes Dev. 1995 Nov 15;9(22):2756–2769. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.22.2756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Simon J. A., Lis J. T. A germline transformation analysis reveals flexibility in the organization of heat shock consensus elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Apr 10;15(7):2971–2988. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.7.2971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Soeller W. C., Oh C. E., Kornberg T. B. Isolation of cDNAs encoding the Drosophila GAGA transcription factor. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Dec;13(12):7961–7970. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.12.7961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tsukiyama T., Becker P. B., Wu C. ATP-dependent nucleosome disruption at a heat-shock promoter mediated by binding of GAGA transcription factor. Nature. 1994 Feb 10;367(6463):525–532. doi: 10.1038/367525a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tsukiyama T., Wu C. Purification and properties of an ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling factor. Cell. 1995 Dec 15;83(6):1011–1020. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90216-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Verrijzer C. P., Chen J. L., Yokomori K., Tjian R. Binding of TAFs to core elements directs promoter selectivity by RNA polymerase II. Cell. 1995 Jun 30;81(7):1115–1125. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(05)80016-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Vincent J. P., Kassis J. A., O'Farrell P. H. A synthetic homeodomain binding site acts as a cell type specific, promoter specific enhancer in Drosophila embryos. EMBO J. 1990 Aug;9(8):2573–2578. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07438.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Weber J. A., Gilmour D. S. Genomic footprinting of the hsp70 and histone H3 promoters in Drosophila embryos reveals novel protein-DNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Aug 25;23(16):3327–3334. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.16.3327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Westwood J. T., Clos J., Wu C. Stress-induced oligomerization and chromosomal relocalization of heat-shock factor. Nature. 1991 Oct 31;353(6347):822–827. doi: 10.1038/353822a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wu C. The 5' ends of Drosophila heat shock genes in chromatin are hypersensitive to DNase I. Nature. 1980 Aug 28;286(5776):854–860. doi: 10.1038/286854a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Xiao H., Lis J. T. Germline transformation used to define key features of heat-shock response elements. Science. 1988 Mar 4;239(4844):1139–1142. doi: 10.1126/science.3125608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Xiao H., Pearson A., Coulombe B., Truant R., Zhang S., Regier J. L., Triezenberg S. J., Reinberg D., Flores O., Ingles C. J. Binding of basal transcription factor TFIIH to the acidic activation domains of VP16 and p53. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Oct;14(10):7013–7024. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.10.7013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES