Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1997 Jul;17(7):3809–3816. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.7.3809

Transcription reinitiation rate: a special role for the TATA box.

D Yean 1, J Gralla 1
PMCID: PMC232232  PMID: 9199314

Abstract

Promoters need to specify both the timing of transcriptional induction and the amount of transcript synthesized. In order to explore each of these effects separately, in vitro assays for the level of active preinitiation complex formation and for the rate of continuous RNA production were done. The effects were found to be influenced differently by different promoter elements. A consensus TATA element had a very strong effect on the rate of continuous RNA production, whereas two types of activators were important primarily in forming active transcription preinitiation complexes. Consensus TATA promoters exhibited high rates of continuous transcription; they assembled active preinitiation transcription complexes slowly but then produced transcripts continuously at an approximately fivefold-higher rate. Initiator-containing TATA-less promoters produced continuous transcripts slowly. Point mutations in the TATA element led to lower levels of transcription by reducing the number of preinitiation complexes and amplifying this reduction by lowering the apparent reinitiation rate. The results allow understanding of the sequence diversity of promoter elements in terms of specifying separate controls over the sensitivity of gene induction and over the strength of the induced promoter.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (406.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Annweiler A., Zwilling S., Hipskind R. A., Wirth T. Analysis of transcriptional stimulation by recombinant Oct proteins in a cell-free system. J Biol Chem. 1993 Feb 5;268(4):2525–2534. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnosti D. N., Merino A., Reinberg D., Schaffner W. Oct-2 facilitates functional preinitiation complex assembly and is continuously required at the promoter for multiple rounds of transcription. EMBO J. 1993 Jan;12(1):157–166. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05641.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aso T., Conaway J. W., Conaway R. C. Role of core promoter structure in assembly of the RNA polymerase II preinitiation complex. A common pathway for formation of preinitiation intermediates at many TATA and TATA-less promoters. J Biol Chem. 1994 Oct 21;269(42):26575–26583. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Azizkhan J. C., Jensen D. E., Pierce A. J., Wade M. Transcription from TATA-less promoters: dihydrofolate reductase as a model. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 1993;3(4):229–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chang C., Gralla J. D. Properties of initiator-associated transcription mediated by GAL4-VP16. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Dec;13(12):7469–7475. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.12.7469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chong J. A., Tapia-Ramírez J., Kim S., Toledo-Aral J. J., Zheng Y., Boutros M. C., Altshuller Y. M., Frohman M. A., Kraner S. D., Mandel G. REST: a mammalian silencer protein that restricts sodium channel gene expression to neurons. Cell. 1995 Mar 24;80(6):949–957. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90298-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dieci G., Sentenac A. Facilitated recycling pathway for RNA polymerase III. Cell. 1996 Jan 26;84(2):245–252. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80979-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dignam J. D., Lebovitz R. M., Roeder R. G. Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Mar 11;11(5):1475–1489. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.5.1475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Emami K. H., Navarre W. W., Smale S. T. Core promoter specificities of the Sp1 and VP16 transcriptional activation domains. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Nov;15(11):5906–5916. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.11.5906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Farnham P. J., Schimke R. T. In vitro transcription and delimitation of promoter elements of the murine dihydrofolate reductase gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Jul;6(7):2392–2401. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.7.2392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Goodrich J. A., Cutler G., Tjian R. Contacts in context: promoter specificity and macromolecular interactions in transcription. Cell. 1996 Mar 22;84(6):825–830. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81061-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hawley D. K., Roeder R. G. Functional steps in transcription initiation and reinitiation from the major late promoter in a HeLa nuclear extract. J Biol Chem. 1987 Mar 15;262(8):3452–3461. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hori R., Carey M. The role of activators in assembly of RNA polymerase II transcription complexes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1994 Apr;4(2):236–244. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(05)80050-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jiang Y., Gralla J. D. Uncoupling of initiation and reinitiation rates during HeLa RNA polymerase II transcription in vitro. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Aug;13(8):4572–4577. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.8.4572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Johnson F. B., Krasnow M. A. Differential regulation of transcription preinitiation complex assembly by activator and repressor homeo domain proteins. Genes Dev. 1992 Nov;6(11):2177–2189. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.11.2177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kadonaga J. T. Assembly and disassembly of the Drosophila RNA polymerase II complex during transcription. J Biol Chem. 1990 Feb 15;265(5):2624–2631. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kassavetis G. A., Braun B. R., Nguyen L. H., Geiduschek E. P. S. cerevisiae TFIIIB is the transcription initiation factor proper of RNA polymerase III, while TFIIIA and TFIIIC are assembly factors. Cell. 1990 Jan 26;60(2):235–245. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90739-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kaufmann J., Verrijzer C. P., Shao J., Smale S. T. CIF, an essential cofactor for TFIID-dependent initiator function. Genes Dev. 1996 Apr 1;10(7):873–886. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.7.873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee M., Struhl K. Mutations on the DNA-binding surface of TATA-binding protein can specifically impair the response to acidic activators in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Oct;15(10):5461–5469. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.10.5461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li L. H., Nerlov C., Prendergast G., MacGregor D., Ziff E. B. c-Myc represses transcription in vivo by a novel mechanism dependent on the initiator element and Myc box II. EMBO J. 1994 Sep 1;13(17):4070–4079. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06724.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mack D. H., Vartikar J., Pipas J. M., Laimins L. A. Specific repression of TATA-mediated but not initiator-mediated transcription by wild-type p53. Nature. 1993 May 20;363(6426):281–283. doi: 10.1038/363281a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mantovani R., Pessara U., Tronche F., Li X. Y., Knapp A. M., Pasquali J. L., Benoist C., Mathis D. Monoclonal antibodies to NF-Y define its function in MHC class II and albumin gene transcription. EMBO J. 1992 Sep;11(9):3315–3322. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05410.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Metz R., Bannister A. J., Sutherland J. A., Hagemeier C., O'Rourke E. C., Cook A., Bravo R., Kouzarides T. c-Fos-induced activation of a TATA-box-containing promoter involves direct contact with TATA-box-binding protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Sep;14(9):6021–6029. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.9.6021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mougey E. B., O'Reilly M., Osheim Y., Miller O. L., Jr, Beyer A., Sollner-Webb B. The terminal balls characteristic of eukaryotic rRNA transcription units in chromatin spreads are rRNA processing complexes. Genes Dev. 1993 Aug;7(8):1609–1619. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.8.1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Osheim Y. N., Mougey E. B., Windle J., Anderson M., O'Reilly M., Miller O. L., Jr, Beyer A., Sollner-Webb B. Metazoan rDNA enhancer acts by making more genes transcriptionally active. J Cell Biol. 1996 Jun;133(5):943–954. doi: 10.1083/jcb.133.5.943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pengue G., Lania L. Krüppel-associated box-mediated repression of RNA polymerase II promoters is influenced by the arrangement of basal promoter elements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Feb 6;93(3):1015–1020. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.3.1015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Roberts S. G., Choy B., Walker S. S., Lin Y. S., Green M. R. A role for activator-mediated TFIIB recruitment in diverse aspects of transcriptional regulation. Curr Biol. 1995 May 1;5(5):508–516. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(95)00103-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Seto E., Usheva A., Zambetti G. P., Momand J., Horikoshi N., Weinmann R., Levine A. J., Shenk T. Wild-type p53 binds to the TATA-binding protein and represses transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Dec 15;89(24):12028–12032. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.24.12028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Slansky J. E., Farnham P. J. Transcriptional regulation of the dihydrofolate reductase gene. Bioessays. 1996 Jan;18(1):55–62. doi: 10.1002/bies.950180111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Smale S. T., Baltimore D. The "initiator" as a transcription control element. Cell. 1989 Apr 7;57(1):103–113. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90176-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Smale S. T., Schmidt M. C., Berk A. J., Baltimore D. Transcriptional activation by Sp1 as directed through TATA or initiator: specific requirement for mammalian transcription factor IID. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jun;87(12):4509–4513. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Starr D. B., Hoopes B. C., Hawley D. K. DNA bending is an important component of site-specific recognition by the TATA binding protein. J Mol Biol. 1995 Jul 21;250(4):434–446. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Struhl K. Chromatin structure and RNA polymerase II connection: implications for transcription. Cell. 1996 Jan 26;84(2):179–182. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80970-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Van Dyke M. W., Sawadogo M., Roeder R. G. Stability of transcription complexes on class II genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Jan;9(1):342–344. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.1.342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Walters M. C., Fiering S., Eidemiller J., Magis W., Groudine M., Martin D. I. Enhancers increase the probability but not the level of gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jul 18;92(15):7125–7129. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.15.7125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang W., Gralla J. D., Carey M. The acidic activator GAL4-AH can stimulate polymerase II transcription by promoting assembly of a closed complex requiring TFIID and TFIIA. Genes Dev. 1992 Sep;6(9):1716–1727. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.9.1716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wefald F. C., Devlin B. H., Williams R. S. Functional heterogeneity of mammalian TATA-box sequences revealed by interaction with a cell-specific enhancer. Nature. 1990 Mar 15;344(6263):260–262. doi: 10.1038/344260a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. White J., Brou C., Wu J., Lutz Y., Moncollin V., Chambon P. The acidic transcriptional activator GAL-VP16 acts on preformed template-committed complexes. EMBO J. 1992 Jun;11(6):2229–2240. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05282.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Yean D., Gralla J. Transcription activation by GC-boxes: evaluation of kinetic and equilibrium contributions. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Jul 15;24(14):2723–2729. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.14.2723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zawel L., Kumar K. P., Reinberg D. Recycling of the general transcription factors during RNA polymerase II transcription. Genes Dev. 1995 Jun 15;9(12):1479–1490. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.12.1479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zenzie-Gregory B., O'Shea-Greenfield A., Smale S. T. Similar mechanisms for transcription initiation mediated through a TATA box or an initiator element. J Biol Chem. 1992 Feb 5;267(4):2823–2830. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES