Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1997 Aug;17(8):4852–4858. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.8.4852

A large protein complex containing the yeast Sin3p and Rpd3p transcriptional regulators.

M M Kasten 1, S Dorland 1, D J Stillman 1
PMCID: PMC232337  PMID: 9234741

Abstract

The SIN3 gene is required for the transcriptional repression of diverse genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sin3p does not bind directly to DNA but is thought to be targeted to promoters by interacting with sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins. We show here that Sin3p is present in a large multiprotein complex with an apparent molecular mass, estimated by gel filtration chromatography, of greater than 2 million Da. Genetic studies have shown that the yeast RPD3 gene has a function similar to that of SIN3 in transcriptional regulation, as SIN3 and RPD3 negatively regulate the same set of genes. The SIN3 and RPD3 genes are conserved from yeasts to mammals, and recent work suggests that RPD3 may encode a histone deacetylase. We show that Rpd3p is present in the Sin3p complex and that an rpd3 mutation eliminates SIN3-dependent repression. Thus, Sin3p may function as a bridge to recruit the Rpd3p histone deacetylase to specific promoters.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (693.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alland L., Muhle R., Hou H., Jr, Potes J., Chin L., Schreiber-Agus N., DePinho R. A. Role for N-CoR and histone deacetylase in Sin3-mediated transcriptional repression. Nature. 1997 May 1;387(6628):49–55. doi: 10.1038/387049a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ayer D. E., Lawrence Q. A., Eisenman R. N. Mad-Max transcriptional repression is mediated by ternary complex formation with mammalian homologs of yeast repressor Sin3. Cell. 1995 Mar 10;80(5):767–776. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90355-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berben G., Dumont J., Gilliquet V., Bolle P. A., Hilger F. The YDp plasmids: a uniform set of vectors bearing versatile gene disruption cassettes for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1991 Jul;7(5):475–477. doi: 10.1002/yea.320070506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bowdish K. S., Mitchell A. P. Bipartite structure of an early meiotic upstream activation sequence from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Apr;13(4):2172–2181. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.4.2172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brownell J. E., Zhou J., Ranalli T., Kobayashi R., Edmondson D. G., Roth S. Y., Allis C. D. Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: a homolog to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation. Cell. 1996 Mar 22;84(6):843–851. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81063-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cairns B. R., Kim Y. J., Sayre M. H., Laurent B. C., Kornberg R. D. A multisubunit complex containing the SWI1/ADR6, SWI2/SNF2, SWI3, SNF5, and SNF6 gene products isolated from yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 1;91(5):1950–1954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.5.1950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Collart M. A., Struhl K. NOT1(CDC39), NOT2(CDC36), NOT3, and NOT4 encode a global-negative regulator of transcription that differentially affects TATA-element utilization. Genes Dev. 1994 Mar 1;8(5):525–537. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.5.525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. De Rubertis F., Kadosh D., Henchoz S., Pauli D., Reuter G., Struhl K., Spierer P. The histone deacetylase RPD3 counteracts genomic silencing in Drosophila and yeast. Nature. 1996 Dec 12;384(6609):589–591. doi: 10.1038/384589a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Draper M. P., Liu H. Y., Nelsbach A. H., Mosley S. P., Denis C. L. CCR4 is a glucose-regulated transcription factor whose leucine-rich repeat binds several proteins important for placing CCR4 in its proper promoter context. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jul;14(7):4522–4531. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.7.4522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Field J., Nikawa J., Broek D., MacDonald B., Rodgers L., Wilson I. A., Lerner R. A., Wigler M. Purification of a RAS-responsive adenylyl cyclase complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by use of an epitope addition method. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 May;8(5):2159–2165. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.5.2159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hanes S. D., Brent R. DNA specificity of the bicoid activator protein is determined by homeodomain recognition helix residue 9. Cell. 1989 Jun 30;57(7):1275–1283. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90063-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hassig C. A., Fleischer T. C., Billin A. N., Schreiber S. L., Ayer D. E. Histone deacetylase activity is required for full transcriptional repression by mSin3A. Cell. 1997 May 2;89(3):341–347. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80214-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Heinzel T., Lavinsky R. M., Mullen T. M., Söderstrom M., Laherty C. D., Torchia J., Yang W. M., Brard G., Ngo S. D., Davie J. R. A complex containing N-CoR, mSin3 and histone deacetylase mediates transcriptional repression. Nature. 1997 May 1;387(6628):43–48. doi: 10.1038/387043a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hudak K. A., Lopes J. M., Henry S. A. A pleiotropic phospholipid biosynthetic regulatory mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is allelic to sin3 (sdi1, ume4, rpd1). Genetics. 1994 Feb;136(2):475–483. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.2.475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jiang Y. W., Dohrmann P. R., Stillman D. J. Genetic and physical interactions between yeast RGR1 and SIN4 in chromatin organization and transcriptional regulation. Genetics. 1995 May;140(1):47–54. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kadosh D., Struhl K. Repression by Ume6 involves recruitment of a complex containing Sin3 corepressor and Rpd3 histone deacetylase to target promoters. Cell. 1997 May 2;89(3):365–371. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80217-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kasten M. M., Ayer D. E., Stillman D. J. SIN3-dependent transcriptional repression by interaction with the Mad1 DNA-binding protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Aug;16(8):4215–4221. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.8.4215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Klekamp M. S., Weil P. A. Specific transcription of homologous class III genes in yeast-soluble cell-free extracts. J Biol Chem. 1982 Jul 25;257(14):8432–8441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Koleske A. J., Young R. A. The RNA polymerase II holoenzyme and its implications for gene regulation. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995 Mar;20(3):113–116. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)88977-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Laherty C. D., Yang W. M., Sun J. M., Davie J. R., Seto E., Eisenman R. N. Histone deacetylases associated with the mSin3 corepressor mediate mad transcriptional repression. Cell. 1997 May 2;89(3):349–356. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80215-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McKenzie E. A., Kent N. A., Dowell S. J., Moreno F., Bird L. E., Mellor J. The centromere and promoter factor, 1, CPF1, of Saccharomyces cerevisiae modulates gene activity through a family of factors including SPT21, RPD1 (SIN3), RPD3 and CCR4. Mol Gen Genet. 1993 Sep;240(3):374–386. doi: 10.1007/BF00280389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nagy L., Kao H. Y., Chakravarti D., Lin R. J., Hassig C. A., Ayer D. E., Schreiber S. L., Evans R. M. Nuclear receptor repression mediated by a complex containing SMRT, mSin3A, and histone deacetylase. Cell. 1997 May 2;89(3):373–380. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80218-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Park H. O., Chant J., Herskowitz I. BUD2 encodes a GTPase-activating protein for Bud1/Rsr1 necessary for proper bud-site selection in yeast. Nature. 1993 Sep 16;365(6443):269–274. doi: 10.1038/365269a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Peterson C. L., Dingwall A., Scott M. P. Five SWI/SNF gene products are components of a large multisubunit complex required for transcriptional enhancement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):2905–2908. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.2905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ruden D. M., Ma J., Li Y., Wood K., Ptashne M. Generating yeast transcriptional activators containing no yeast protein sequences. Nature. 1991 Mar 21;350(6315):250–252. doi: 10.1038/350250a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rundlett S. E., Carmen A. A., Kobayashi R., Bavykin S., Turner B. M., Grunstein M. HDA1 and RPD3 are members of distinct yeast histone deacetylase complexes that regulate silencing and transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Dec 10;93(25):14503–14508. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sherman F. Getting started with yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:3–21. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94004-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stillman D. J., Dorland S., Yu Y. Epistasis analysis of suppressor mutations that allow HO expression in the absence of the yeast SW15 transcriptional activator. Genetics. 1994 Mar;136(3):781–788. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.3.781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Strich R., Slater M. R., Esposito R. E. Identification of negative regulatory genes that govern the expression of early meiotic genes in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec;86(24):10018–10022. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.24.10018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Swanson M. S., Winston F. SPT4, SPT5 and SPT6 interactions: effects on transcription and viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):325–336. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Taunton J., Hassig C. A., Schreiber S. L. A mammalian histone deacetylase related to the yeast transcriptional regulator Rpd3p. Science. 1996 Apr 19;272(5260):408–411. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5260.408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Thomas B. J., Rothstein R. Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA. Cell. 1989 Feb 24;56(4):619–630. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90584-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Treich I., Cairns B. R., de los Santos T., Brewster E., Carlson M. SNF11, a new component of the yeast SNF-SWI complex that interacts with a conserved region of SNF2. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Aug;15(8):4240–4248. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.8.4240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Turner B. M., O'Neill L. P. Histone acetylation in chromatin and chromosomes. Semin Cell Biol. 1995 Aug;6(4):229–236. doi: 10.1006/scel.1995.0031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vannier D., Balderes D., Shore D. Evidence that the transcriptional regulators SIN3 and RPD3, and a novel gene (SDS3) with similar functions, are involved in transcriptional silencing in S. cerevisiae. Genetics. 1996 Dec;144(4):1343–1353. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.4.1343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Vidal M., Gaber R. F. RPD3 encodes a second factor required to achieve maximum positive and negative transcriptional states in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Dec;11(12):6317–6327. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.12.6317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Vidal M., Strich R., Esposito R. E., Gaber R. F. RPD1 (SIN3/UME4) is required for maximal activation and repression of diverse yeast genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Dec;11(12):6306–6316. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.12.6306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang H., Clark I., Nicholson P. R., Herskowitz I., Stillman D. J. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae SIN3 gene, a negative regulator of HO, contains four paired amphipathic helix motifs. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Nov;10(11):5927–5936. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.11.5927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang H., Stillman D. J. In vitro regulation of a SIN3-dependent DNA-binding activity by stimulatory and inhibitory factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Dec;87(24):9761–9765. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.24.9761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang H., Stillman D. J. Transcriptional repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a SIN3-LexA fusion protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Mar;13(3):1805–1814. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.3.1805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Williams F. E., Varanasi U., Trumbly R. J. The CYC8 and TUP1 proteins involved in glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are associated in a protein complex. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jun;11(6):3307–3316. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.6.3307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wolffe A. P. Histone deacetylase: a regulator of transcription. Science. 1996 Apr 19;272(5260):371–372. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5260.371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yoshimoto H., Ohmae M., Yamashita I. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAM2/SIN3 protein plays a role in both activation and repression of transcription. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 May;233(1-2):327–330. doi: 10.1007/BF00587597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhang Y., Iratni R., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., Reinberg D. Histone deacetylases and SAP18, a novel polypeptide, are components of a human Sin3 complex. Cell. 1997 May 2;89(3):357–364. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80216-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES