Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1997 Oct;17(10):5897–5904. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.10.5897

Stability of patch methylation and its impact in regions of transcriptional initiation and elongation.

C L Hsieh 1
PMCID: PMC232437  PMID: 9315647

Abstract

CpG DNA methylation has previously been correlated with the suppression of transcription. The mechanism of this suppression is not understood, and many aspects of the temporal and positional relationships between the region of methylation and transcription have not yet been defined. Here, 12-kb stable replicating episomes that can be maintained in human somatic cells for weeks to months were used. Such a system allows more direct manipulation and is free from the positional effects attendant with the analysis of endogenous loci or integrated transgenes. By using these circular minichromosomes, patches of CpG methylation were created to include or exclude the regions of transcriptional initiation and elongation. I found that a 0.5-kb patch of methylation that covered the promoter suppressed expression only 2-fold and that a 1.9-kb patch of methylation that covered the coding portion of the gene (but not the promoter) suppressed expression about 10-fold. In contrast, methylation of the entire minichromosome except for the promoter or the coding portion suppressed transcription about 50- to 200-fold. I infer the following. Methylation of the 0.5-kb promoter fragment does not significantly affect transcription at the level of transcription factor binding or local chromatin structure. The dominant effect on transcription occurs when the length of methylated DNA is long, with little disproportionate effect of methylation of specific regions, such as that of initiation or elongation. I also found that the boundaries between these methylated and unmethylated regions remained stable for the many weeks that I monitored them.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (886.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Almouzni G., Wolffe A. P. Replication-coupled chromatin assembly is required for the repression of basal transcription in vivo. Genes Dev. 1993 Oct;7(10):2033–2047. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.10.2033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Antequera F., Boyes J., Bird A. High levels of de novo methylation and altered chromatin structure at CpG islands in cell lines. Cell. 1990 Aug 10;62(3):503–514. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90015-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bestor T. H., Verdine G. L. DNA methyltransferases. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;6(3):380–389. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90030-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cedar H. DNA methylation and gene activity. Cell. 1988 Apr 8;53(1):3–4. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90479-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Engler P., Weng A., Storb U. Influence of CpG methylation and target spacing on V(D)J recombination in a transgenic substrate. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Jan;13(1):571–577. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.1.571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ernberg I., Falk K., Minarovits J., Busson P., Tursz T., Masucci M. G., Klein G. The role of methylation in the phenotype-dependent modulation of Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 2 and latent membrane protein genes in cells latently infected with Epstein-Barr virus. J Gen Virol. 1989 Nov;70(Pt 11):2989–3002. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-70-11-2989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Graessmann M., Graessmann A. DNA methylation, chromatin structure and the regulation of gene expression. EXS. 1993;64:404–424. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-9118-9_18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hirt B. Selective extraction of polyoma DNA from infected mouse cell cultures. J Mol Biol. 1967 Jun 14;26(2):365–369. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(67)90307-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hsieh C. L. Dependence of transcriptional repression on CpG methylation density. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Aug;14(8):5487–5494. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.8.5487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hsieh C. L., Lieber M. R. CpG methylated minichromosomes become inaccessible for V(D)J recombination after undergoing replication. EMBO J. 1992 Jan;11(1):315–325. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05054.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hsieh C. L., McCloskey R. P., Lieber M. R. V(D)J recombination on minichromosomes is not affected by transcription. J Biol Chem. 1992 Aug 5;267(22):15613–15619. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jost J. P., Hofsteenge J. The repressor MDBP-2 is a member of the histone H1 family that binds preferentially in vitro and in vivo to methylated nonspecific DNA sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Oct 15;89(20):9499–9503. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kamakaka R. T., Bulger M., Kaufman P. D., Stillman B., Kadonaga J. T. Postreplicative chromatin assembly by Drosophila and human chromatin assembly factor 1. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Mar;16(3):810–817. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.3.810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kass S. U., Goddard J. P., Adams R. L. Inactive chromatin spreads from a focus of methylation. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Dec;13(12):7372–7379. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.12.7372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kass S. U., Landsberger N., Wolffe A. P. DNA methylation directs a time-dependent repression of transcription initiation. Curr Biol. 1997 Mar 1;7(3):157–165. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(97)70086-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Keshet I., Lieman-Hurwitz J., Cedar H. DNA methylation affects the formation of active chromatin. Cell. 1986 Feb 28;44(4):535–543. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90263-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Langner K. D., Vardimon L., Renz D., Doerfler W. DNA methylation of three 5' C-C-G-G 3' sites in the promoter and 5' region inactivate the E2a gene of adenovirus type 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 May;81(10):2950–2954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.10.2950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Leonhardt H., Page A. W., Weier H. U., Bestor T. H. A targeting sequence directs DNA methyltransferase to sites of DNA replication in mammalian nuclei. Cell. 1992 Nov 27;71(5):865–873. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90561-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Meehan R. R., Lewis J. D., McKay S., Kleiner E. L., Bird A. P. Identification of a mammalian protein that binds specifically to DNA containing methylated CpGs. Cell. 1989 Aug 11;58(3):499–507. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90430-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Miller J. B. Myoblast diversity in skeletal myogenesis: how much and to what end? Cell. 1992 Apr 3;69(1):1–3. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90111-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Minarovits J., Minarovits-Kormuta S., Ehlin-Henriksson B., Falk K., Klein G., Ernberg I. Host cell phenotype-dependent methylation patterns of Epstein-Barr virus DNA. J Gen Virol. 1991 Jul;72(Pt 7):1591–1599. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-72-7-1591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nan X., Campoy F. J., Bird A. MeCP2 is a transcriptional repressor with abundant binding sites in genomic chromatin. Cell. 1997 Feb 21;88(4):471–481. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81887-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Razin A., Cedar H. DNA methylation and gene expression. Microbiol Rev. 1991 Sep;55(3):451–458. doi: 10.1128/mr.55.3.451-458.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Razin A., Kafri T. DNA methylation from embryo to adult. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1994;48:53–81. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60853-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Smith S., Stillman B. Stepwise assembly of chromatin during DNA replication in vitro. EMBO J. 1991 Apr;10(4):971–980. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb08031.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Toth M., Lichtenberg U., Doerfler W. Genomic sequencing reveals a 5-methylcytosine-free domain in active promoters and the spreading of preimposed methylation patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 May;86(10):3728–3732. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.10.3728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wigler M., Sweet R., Sim G. K., Wold B., Pellicer A., Lacy E., Maniatis T., Silverstein S., Axel R. Transformation of mammalian cells with genes from procaryotes and eucaryotes. Cell. 1979 Apr;16(4):777–785. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90093-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES