Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1997 Nov;17(11):6386–6393. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.11.6386

Chromosomal double-strand breaks induce gene conversion at high frequency in mammalian cells.

D G Taghian 1, J A Nickoloff 1
PMCID: PMC232490  PMID: 9343400

Abstract

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) stimulate chromosomal and extrachromosomal recombination and gene targeting. Transcription also stimulates spontaneous recombination by an unknown mechanism. We used Saccharomyces cerevisiae I-SceI to stimulate recombination between neo direct repeats in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell chromosomal DNA. One neo allele was controlled by the dexamethasone-inducible mouse mammary tumor virus promoter and inactivated by an insertion containing an I-SceI site at which DSBs were introduced in vivo. The other neo allele lacked a promoter but carried 12 phenotypically silent single-base mutations that create restriction sites (restriction fragment length polymorphisms). This system allowed us to generate detailed conversion tract spectra for recipient alleles transcribed at high or low levels. Transient in vivo expression of I-SceI increased homologous recombination 2,000- to 10,000-fold, yielding recombinants at frequencies as high as 1%. Strikingly, 97% of these products arose by gene conversion. Most products had short, bidirectional conversion tracts, and in all cases, donor neo alleles (i.e., those not suffering a DSB) remained unchanged, indicating that conversion was fully nonreciprocal. DSBs in exogenous DNA are usually repaired by end joining requiring little or no homology or by nonconservative homologous recombination (single-strand annealing). In contrast, we show that chromosomal DSBs are efficiently repaired via conservative homologous recombination, principally gene conversion without associated crossing over. For DSB-induced events, similar recombination frequencies and conversion tract spectra were found under conditions of low and high transcription. Thus, transcription does not further stimulate DSB-induced recombination, nor does it appear to affect the mechanism(s) by which DSBs induce gene conversion.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (417.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aguilera A., Klein H. L. Yeast intrachromosomal recombination: long gene conversion tracts are preferentially associated with reciprocal exchange and require the RAD1 and RAD3 gene products. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):683–694. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson R. A., Eliason S. L. Recombination of homologous DNA fragments transfected into mammalian cells occurs predominantly by terminal pairing. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Sep;6(9):3246–3252. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.9.3246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Belmaaza A., Chartrand P. One-sided invasion events in homologous recombination at double-strand breaks. Mutat Res. 1994 May;314(3):199–208. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(94)90065-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bollag R. J., Elwood D. R., Tobin E. D., Godwin A. R., Liskay R. M. Formation of heteroduplex DNA during mammalian intrachromosomal gene conversion. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Apr;12(4):1546–1552. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.4.1546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bollag R. J., Liskay R. M. Conservative intrachromosomal recombination between inverted repeats in mouse cells: association between reciprocal exchange and gene conversion. Genetics. 1988 May;119(1):161–169. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.1.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bollag R. J., Liskay R. M. Direct-repeat analysis of chromatid interactions during intrachromosomal recombination in mouse cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Oct;11(10):4839–4845. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.10.4839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brenneman M., Gimble F. S., Wilson J. H. Stimulation of intrachromosomal homologous recombination in human cells by electroporation with site-specific endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Apr 16;93(8):3608–3612. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.8.3608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Camerini-Otero R. D., Hsieh P. Homologous recombination proteins in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Annu Rev Genet. 1995;29:509–552. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.29.120195.002453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chakrabarti S., Seidman M. M. Intramolecular recombination between transfected repeated sequences in mammalian cells is nonconservative. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Jul;6(7):2520–2526. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.7.2520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Choulika A., Perrin A., Dujon B., Nicolas J. F. Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Apr;15(4):1968–1973. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.4.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Colleaux L., D'Auriol L., Galibert F., Dujon B. Recognition and cleavage site of the intron-encoded omega transposase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(16):6022–6026. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.16.6022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Deng W. P., Nickoloff J. A. Mismatch repair of heteroduplex DNA intermediates of extrachromosomal recombination in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jan;14(1):400–406. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.1.400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Derbyshire M. K., Epstein L. H., Young C. S., Munz P. L., Fishel R. Nonhomologous recombination in human cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jan;14(1):156–169. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.1.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Detloff P., Petes T. D. Measurements of excision repair tracts formed during meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Apr;12(4):1805–1814. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.4.1805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Detloff P., Sieber J., Petes T. D. Repair of specific base pair mismatches formed during meiotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;11(2):737–745. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.2.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ganesh A., North P., Thacker J. Repair and misrepair of site-specific DNA double-strand breaks by human cell extracts. Mutat Res. 1993 May;299(3-4):251–259. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(93)90101-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gangloff S., Zou H., Rothstein R. Gene conversion plays the major role in controlling the stability of large tandem repeats in yeast. EMBO J. 1996 Apr 1;15(7):1715–1725. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Godwin A. R., Bollag R. J., Christie D. M., Liskay R. M. Spontaneous and restriction enzyme-induced chromosomal recombination in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Dec 20;91(26):12554–12558. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.26.12554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoffmann G. R. Induction of genetic recombination: consequences and model systems. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1994;23 (Suppl 24):59–66. doi: 10.1002/em.2850230614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jasin M. Genetic manipulation of genomes with rare-cutting endonucleases. Trends Genet. 1996 Jun;12(6):224–228. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(96)10019-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jinks-Robertson S., Michelitch M., Ramcharan S. Substrate length requirements for efficient mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Jul;13(7):3937–3950. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.7.3937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kadyk L. C., Hartwell L. H. Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):387–402. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Keil R. L., Roeder G. S. Cis-acting, recombination-stimulating activity in a fragment of the ribosomal DNA of S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1984 Dec;39(2 Pt 1):377–386. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90016-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Klein H. L. Lack of association between intrachromosomal gene conversion and reciprocal exchange. 1984 Aug 30-Sep 5Nature. 310(5980):748–753. doi: 10.1038/310748a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kocabiyik S., Perlin M. H. Site-specific mutations of conserved C-terminal residues in aminoglycoside 3'-phosphotransferase II: phenotypic and structural analysis of mutant enzymes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992 Jun 30;185(3):925–931. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(92)91715-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lahue R. S., Au K. G., Modrich P. DNA mismatch correction in a defined system. Science. 1989 Jul 14;245(4914):160–164. doi: 10.1126/science.2665076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Liang F., Romanienko P. J., Weaver D. T., Jeggo P. A., Jasin M. Chromosomal double-strand break repair in Ku80-deficient cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 20;93(17):8929–8933. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.17.8929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lin F. L., Sperle K., Sternberg N. Intermolecular recombination between DNAs introduced into mouse L cells is mediated by a nonconservative pathway that leads to crossover products. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Jan;10(1):103–112. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.1.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lin F. L., Sperle K., Sternberg N. Model for homologous recombination during transfer of DNA into mouse L cells: role for DNA ends in the recombination process. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Jun;4(6):1020–1034. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.6.1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lin F. L., Sperle K., Sternberg N. Repair of double-stranded DNA breaks by homologous DNA fragments during transfer of DNA into mouse L cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Jan;10(1):113–119. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.1.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Liskay R. M., Letsou A., Stachelek J. L. Homology requirement for efficient gene conversion between duplicated chromosomal sequences in mammalian cells. Genetics. 1987 Jan;115(1):161–167. doi: 10.1093/genetics/115.1.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lukacsovich T., Yang D., Waldman A. S. Repair of a specific double-strand break generated within a mammalian chromosome by yeast endonuclease I-SceI. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Dec 25;22(25):5649–5657. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.25.5649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nelson H. H., Sweetser D. B., Nickoloff J. A. Effects of terminal nonhomology and homeology on double-strand-break-induced gene conversion tract directionality. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Jun;16(6):2951–2957. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.6.2951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nickoloff J. A., Reynolds R. J. Transcription stimulates homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Sep;10(9):4837–4845. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.9.4837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nickoloff J. A., Singer J. D., Hoekstra M. F., Heffron F. Double-strand breaks stimulate alternative mechanisms of recombination repair. J Mol Biol. 1989 Jun 5;207(3):527–541. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90462-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nickoloff J. A. Transcription enhances intrachromosomal homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Dec;12(12):5311–5318. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.12.5311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nicolás A. L., Munz P. L., Young C. S. A modified single-strand annealing model best explains the joining of DNA double-strand breaks mammalian cells and cell extracts. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Mar 25;23(6):1036–1043. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.6.1036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Nicolás A. L., Young C. S. Characterization of DNA end joining in a mammalian cell nuclear extract: junction formation is accompanied by nucleotide loss, which is limited and uniform but not site specific. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jan;14(1):170–180. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.1.170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. North P., Ganesh A., Thacker J. The rejoining of double-strand breaks in DNA by human cell extracts. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Nov 11;18(21):6205–6210. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.21.6205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Perlman P. S., Butow R. A. Mobile introns and intron-encoded proteins. Science. 1989 Dec 1;246(4934):1106–1109. doi: 10.1126/science.2479980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Pfeiffer P., Thode S., Hancke J., Vielmetter W. Mechanisms of overlap formation in nonhomologous DNA end joining. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;14(2):888–895. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.2.888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Priebe S. D., Westmoreland J., Nilsson-Tillgren T., Resnick M. A. Induction of recombination between homologous and diverged DNAs by double-strand gaps and breaks and role of mismatch repair. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jul;14(7):4802–4814. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.7.4802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ray A., Siddiqi I., Kolodkin A. L., Stahl F. W. Intra-chromosomal gene conversion induced by a DNA double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Mol Biol. 1988 May 20;201(2):247–260. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90136-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ray B. L., White C. I., Haber J. E. Heteroduplex formation and mismatch repair of the "stuck" mutation during mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Oct;11(10):5372–5380. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.10.5372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Roth D. B., Wilson J. H. Relative rates of homologous and nonhomologous recombination in transfected DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 May;82(10):3355–3359. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.10.3355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rouet P., Smih F., Jasin M. Expression of a site-specific endonuclease stimulates homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jun 21;91(13):6064–6068. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.13.6064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rouet P., Smih F., Jasin M. Introduction of double-strand breaks into the genome of mouse cells by expression of a rare-cutting endonuclease. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Dec;14(12):8096–8106. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.12.8096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Rudin N., Haber J. E. Efficient repair of HO-induced chromosomal breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by recombination between flanking homologous sequences. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Sep;8(9):3918–3928. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.9.3918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sargent R. G., Brenneman M. A., Wilson J. H. Repair of site-specific double-strand breaks in a mammalian chromosome by homologous and illegitimate recombination. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Jan;17(1):267–277. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.1.267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Seidman M. M. Intermolecular homologous recombination between transfected sequences in mammalian cells is primarily nonconservative. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Oct;7(10):3561–3565. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.10.3561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Shinohara A., Ogawa T. Homologous recombination and the roles of double-strand breaks. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995 Oct;20(10):387–391. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)89085-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Southern P. J., Berg P. Transformation of mammalian cells to antibiotic resistance with a bacterial gene under control of the SV40 early region promoter. J Mol Appl Genet. 1982;1(4):327–341. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Stewart S. E., Roeder G. S. Transcription by RNA polymerase I stimulates mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Aug;9(8):3464–3472. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.8.3464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sugawara N., Haber J. E. Characterization of double-strand break-induced recombination: homology requirements and single-stranded DNA formation. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Feb;12(2):563–575. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.2.563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sun H., Treco D., Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. Double-strand breaks at an initiation site for meiotic gene conversion. Nature. 1989 Mar 2;338(6210):87–90. doi: 10.1038/338087a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sweetser D. B., Hough H., Whelden J. F., Arbuckle M., Nickoloff J. A. Fine-resolution mapping of spontaneous and double-strand break-induced gene conversion tracts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals reversible mitotic conversion polarity. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;14(6):3863–3875. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.6.3863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Taghian D. G., Nickoloff J. A. Subcloning strategies and protocols. Methods Mol Biol. 1996;58:221–235. doi: 10.1385/0-89603-402-X:221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Thacker J., Chalk J., Ganesh A., North P. A mechanism for deletion formation in DNA by human cell extracts: the involvement of short sequence repeats. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Dec 11;20(23):6183–6188. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.23.6183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Thomas B. J., Rothstein R. Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA. Cell. 1989 Feb 24;56(4):619–630. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90584-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Thomas K. R., Folger K. R., Capecchi M. R. High frequency targeting of genes to specific sites in the mammalian genome. Cell. 1986 Feb 14;44(3):419–428. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90463-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Voelkel-Meiman K., Keil R. L., Roeder G. S. Recombination-stimulating sequences in yeast ribosomal DNA correspond to sequences regulating transcription by RNA polymerase I. Cell. 1987 Mar 27;48(6):1071–1079. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90714-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Waldman A. S., Liskay R. M. Dependence of intrachromosomal recombination in mammalian cells on uninterrupted homology. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;8(12):5350–5357. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.12.5350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Waldman A. S., Liskay R. M. Differential effects of base-pair mismatch on intrachromosomal versus extrachromosomal recombination in mouse cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(15):5340–5344. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.15.5340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Winegar R. A., Lutze L. H., Rufer J. T., Morgan W. F. Spectrum of mutations produced by specific types of restriction enzyme-induced double-strand breaks. Mutagenesis. 1992 Nov;7(6):439–445. doi: 10.1093/mutage/7.6.439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wood R. D. DNA repair in eukaryotes. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:135–167. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.001031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES