Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1997 Nov;17(11):6693–6699. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.11.6693

The ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Rad6 (Ubc2) is required for silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

H Huang 1, A Kahana 1, D E Gottschling 1, L Prakash 1, S W Liebman 1
PMCID: PMC232523  PMID: 9343433

Abstract

It has been previously shown that genes transcribed by RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) are subject to position effect variegation when located near yeast telomeres. This telomere position effect requires a number of gene products that are also required for silencing at the HML and HMR loci. Here, we show that a null mutation of the DNA repair gene RAD6 reduces silencing of the HM loci and lowers the mating efficiency of MATa strains. Likewise, rad6-delta reduces silencing of the telomere-located RNAP II-transcribed genes URA3 and ADE2. We also show that the RNAP III-transcribed tyrosyl tRNA gene, SUP4-o, is subject to position effect variegation when located near a telomere and that this silencing requires the RAD6 and SIR genes. Neither of the two known Rad6 binding factors, Rad18 and Ubr1, is required for telomeric silencing. Since Ubrl is the recognition component of the N-end rule-dependent protein degradation pathway, this suggests that N-end rule-dependent protein degradation is not involved in telomeric silencing. Telomeric silencing requires the amino terminus of Rad6. Two rad6 point mutations, rad6(C88A) and rad6(C88S), which are defective in ubiquitin-conjugating activity fail to complement the silencing defect, indicating that the ubiquitin-conjugating activity of RAD6 is essential for full telomeric silencing.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (771.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aparicio O. M., Billington B. L., Gottschling D. E. Modifiers of position effect are shared between telomeric and silent mating-type loci in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1991 Sep 20;66(6):1279–1287. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90049-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aparicio O. M., Gottschling D. E. Overcoming telomeric silencing: a trans-activator competes to establish gene expression in a cell cycle-dependent way. Genes Dev. 1994 May 15;8(10):1133–1146. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.10.1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailly V., Lamb J., Sung P., Prakash S., Prakash L. Specific complex formation between yeast RAD6 and RAD18 proteins: a potential mechanism for targeting RAD6 ubiquitin-conjugating activity to DNA damage sites. Genes Dev. 1994 Apr 1;8(7):811–820. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.7.811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bartel B., Wünning I., Varshavsky A. The recognition component of the N-end rule pathway. EMBO J. 1990 Oct;9(10):3179–3189. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07516.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boeke J. D., LaCroute F., Fink G. R. A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5'-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;197(2):345–346. doi: 10.1007/BF00330984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bryk M., Banerjee M., Murphy M., Knudsen K. E., Garfinkel D. J., Curcio M. J. Transcriptional silencing of Ty1 elements in the RDN1 locus of yeast. Genes Dev. 1997 Jan 15;11(2):255–269. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.2.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chernoff Y. O., Vincent A., Liebman S. W. Mutations in eukaryotic 18S ribosomal RNA affect translational fidelity and resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics. EMBO J. 1994 Feb 15;13(4):906–913. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06334.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dohmen R. J., Madura K., Bartel B., Varshavsky A. The N-end rule is mediated by the UBC2(RAD6) ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Aug 15;88(16):7351–7355. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.16.7351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Enomoto S., McCune-Zierath P. D., Gerami-Nejad M., Sanders M. A., Berman J. RLF2, a subunit of yeast chromatin assembly factor-I, is required for telomeric chromatin function in vivo. Genes Dev. 1997 Feb 1;11(3):358–370. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.3.358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gottlieb S., Esposito R. E. A new role for a yeast transcriptional silencer gene, SIR2, in regulation of recombination in ribosomal DNA. Cell. 1989 Mar 10;56(5):771–776. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90681-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gottschling D. E., Aparicio O. M., Billington B. L., Zakian V. A. Position effect at S. cerevisiae telomeres: reversible repression of Pol II transcription. Cell. 1990 Nov 16;63(4):751–762. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90141-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gottschling D. E. Telomere-proximal DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is refractory to methyltransferase activity in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 May 1;89(9):4062–4065. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.9.4062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Haas A., Reback P. M., Pratt G., Rechsteiner M. Ubiquitin-mediated degradation of histone H3 does not require the substrate-binding ubiquitin protein ligase, E3, or attachment of polyubiquitin chains. J Biol Chem. 1990 Dec 15;265(35):21664–21669. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hecht A., Laroche T., Strahl-Bolsinger S., Gasser S. M., Grunstein M. Histone H3 and H4 N-termini interact with SIR3 and SIR4 proteins: a molecular model for the formation of heterochromatin in yeast. Cell. 1995 Feb 24;80(4):583–592. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90512-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hecht A., Strahl-Bolsinger S., Grunstein M. Spreading of transcriptional repressor SIR3 from telomeric heterochromatin. Nature. 1996 Sep 5;383(6595):92–96. doi: 10.1038/383092a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Henchoz S., De Rubertis F., Pauli D., Spierer P. The dose of a putative ubiquitin-specific protease affects position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Oct;16(10):5717–5725. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.10.5717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Johnson A. D. Molecular mechanisms of cell-type determination in budding yeast. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1995 Oct;5(5):552–558. doi: 10.1016/0959-437x(95)80022-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jones J. S., Prakash L. Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae selectable markers in pUC18 polylinkers. Yeast. 1990 Sep-Oct;6(5):363–366. doi: 10.1002/yea.320060502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kaufman P. D., Kobayashi R., Stillman B. Ultraviolet radiation sensitivity and reduction of telomeric silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells lacking chromatin assembly factor-I. Genes Dev. 1997 Feb 1;11(3):345–357. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.3.345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kennedy B. K., Austriaco N. R., Jr, Zhang J., Guarente L. Mutation in the silencing gene SIR4 can delay aging in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1995 Feb 10;80(3):485–496. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90499-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kimmerly W. J., Rine J. Replication and segregation of plasmids containing cis-acting regulatory sites of silent mating-type genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are controlled by the SIR genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Dec;7(12):4225–4237. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.12.4225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kornitzer D., Raboy B., Kulka R. G., Fink G. R. Regulated degradation of the transcription factor Gcn4. EMBO J. 1994 Dec 15;13(24):6021–6030. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06948.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Laman H., Balderes D., Shore D. Disturbance of normal cell cycle progression enhances the establishment of transcriptional silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Jul;15(7):3608–3617. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.7.3608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Loo S., Rine J. Silencers and domains of generalized repression. Science. 1994 Jun 17;264(5166):1768–1771. doi: 10.1126/science.8209257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Loo S., Rine J. Silencing and heritable domains of gene expression. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1995;11:519–548. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.11.110195.002511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Moazed D., Johnson D. A deubiquitinating enzyme interacts with SIR4 and regulates silencing in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1996 Aug 23;86(4):667–677. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80139-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Morrison A., Miller E. J., Prakash L. Domain structure and functional analysis of the carboxyl-terminal polyacidic sequence of the RAD6 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Mar;8(3):1179–1185. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.3.1179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Paetkau D. W., Riese J. A., MacMorran W. S., Woods R. A., Gietz R. D. Interaction of the yeast RAD7 and SIR3 proteins: implications for DNA repair and chromatin structure. Genes Dev. 1994 Sep 1;8(17):2035–2045. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.17.2035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Palladino F., Laroche T., Gilson E., Axelrod A., Pillus L., Gasser S. M. SIR3 and SIR4 proteins are required for the positioning and integrity of yeast telomeres. Cell. 1993 Nov 5;75(3):543–555. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90388-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Picologlou S., Brown N., Liebman S. W. Mutations in RAD6, a yeast gene encoding a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, stimulate retrotransposition. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Mar;10(3):1017–1022. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.3.1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Prakash S., Sung P., Prakash L. DNA repair genes and proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu Rev Genet. 1993;27:33–70. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.27.120193.000341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Renauld H., Aparicio O. M., Zierath P. D., Billington B. L., Chhablani S. K., Gottschling D. E. Silent domains are assembled continuously from the telomere and are defined by promoter distance and strength, and by SIR3 dosage. Genes Dev. 1993 Jul;7(7A):1133–1145. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.7a.1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Reynolds P., Weber S., Prakash L. RAD6 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a protein containing a tract of 13 consecutive aspartates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jan;82(1):168–172. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.1.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rine J., Herskowitz I. Four genes responsible for a position effect on expression from HML and HMR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):9–22. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Roest H. P., van Klaveren J., de Wit J., van Gurp C. G., Koken M. H., Vermey M., van Roijen J. H., Hoogerbrugge J. W., Vreeburg J. T., Baarends W. M. Inactivation of the HR6B ubiquitin-conjugating DNA repair enzyme in mice causes male sterility associated with chromatin modification. Cell. 1996 Sep 6;86(5):799–810. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80154-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rubin G. M. Preparation of RNA and ribosomes from yeast. Methods Cell Biol. 1975;12:45–64. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60951-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Shaw K. J., Olson M. V. Effects of altered 5'-flanking sequences on the in vivo expression of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae tRNATyr gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Apr;4(4):657–665. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.4.657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Singer M. S., Gottschling D. E. TLC1: template RNA component of Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomerase. Science. 1994 Oct 21;266(5184):404–409. doi: 10.1126/science.7545955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Singh J., Klar A. J. Active genes in budding yeast display enhanced in vivo accessibility to foreign DNA methylases: a novel in vivo probe for chromatin structure of yeast. Genes Dev. 1992 Feb;6(2):186–196. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.2.186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Smeal T., Claus J., Kennedy B., Cole F., Guarente L. Loss of transcriptional silencing causes sterility in old mother cells of S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1996 Feb 23;84(4):633–642. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81038-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sprague G. F., Jr Assay of yeast mating reaction. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:77–93. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94008-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sung P., Berleth E., Pickart C., Prakash S., Prakash L. Yeast RAD6 encoded ubiquitin conjugating enzyme mediates protein degradation dependent on the N-end-recognizing E3 enzyme. EMBO J. 1991 Aug;10(8):2187–2193. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07754.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sung P., Prakash S., Prakash L. Mutation of cysteine-88 in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD6 protein abolishes its ubiquitin-conjugating activity and its various biological functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Apr;87(7):2695–2699. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.7.2695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sung P., Prakash S., Prakash L. Stable ester conjugate between the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD6 protein and ubiquitin has no biological activity. J Mol Biol. 1991 Oct 5;221(3):745–749. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)80169-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sung P., Prakash S., Prakash L. The RAD6 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae polyubiquitinates histones, and its acidic domain mediates this activity. Genes Dev. 1988 Nov;2(11):1476–1485. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.11.1476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sussel L., Vannier D., Shore D. Suppressors of defective silencing in yeast: effects on transcriptional repression at the HMR locus, cell growth and telomere structure. Genetics. 1995 Nov;141(3):873–888. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.3.873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Thompson J. S., Ling X., Grunstein M. Histone H3 amino terminus is required for telomeric and silent mating locus repression in yeast. Nature. 1994 May 19;369(6477):245–247. doi: 10.1038/369245a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Varshavsky A. The N-end rule. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1995;60:461–478. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1995.060.01.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Watkins J. F., Sung P., Prakash S., Prakash L. The extremely conserved amino terminus of RAD6 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme is essential for amino-end rule-dependent protein degradation. Genes Dev. 1993 Feb;7(2):250–261. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.2.250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wright J. H., Gottschling D. E., Zakian V. A. Saccharomyces telomeres assume a non-nucleosomal chromatin structure. Genes Dev. 1992 Feb;6(2):197–210. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.2.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES