Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1997 May;35(5):1258–1259. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.5.1258-1259.1997

Use of cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar and L-proline-aminopeptidase (PRO Discs) in the rapid identification of Clostridium difficile.

D P Fedorko 1, E C Williams 1
PMCID: PMC232741  PMID: 9114419

Abstract

The PRO Disc (Carr-Scarborough Microbiologicals, Inc., Decatur, Ga.) can be used to screen for L-proline-aminopeptidase produced by Clostridium difficile grown on cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA). Fifty stored isolates of C. difficile (48 toxin-positive and 2 toxin-negative isolates) and 47 fresh C. difficile isolates (39 toxin-positive and 8 toxin-negative isolates) were all PRO Disc positive. Other Clostridium species that were PRO Disc positive could be differentiated from C. difficile by failure to grow on CCFA, different colonial morphology on CCFA, or morphology upon Gram staining.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (109.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Al-Jumaili I. J., Bint A. J. Simple method for isolation and presumptive identification of Clostridium difficile. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1981;250(1-2):142–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Borriello S. P., Honour P. Simplified procedure for the routine isolation of Clostridium difficile from faeces. J Clin Pathol. 1981 Oct;34(10):1124–1127. doi: 10.1136/jcp.34.10.1124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chang T. W., Gorbach S. L. Rapid identification of Clostridium difficile by toxin detection. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Mar;15(3):465–467. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.3.465-467.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lyerly D. M., Krivan H. C., Wilkins T. D. Clostridium difficile: its disease and toxins. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1988 Jan;1(1):1–18. doi: 10.1128/cmr.1.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mundy L. S., Shanholtzer C. J., Willard K. E., Gerding D. N., Peterson L. R. Laboratory detection of Clostridium difficile. A comparison of media and incubation systems. Am J Clin Pathol. 1995 Jan;103(1):52–56. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/103.1.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Peterson L. R., Kelly P. J., Nordbrock H. A. Role of culture and toxin detection in laboratory testing for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Apr;15(4):330–336. doi: 10.1007/BF01695667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Peterson L. R., Olson M. M., Shanholtzer C. J., Gerding D. N. Results of a prospective, 18-month clinical evaluation of culture, cytotoxin testing, and culturette brand (CDT) latex testing in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988 Jun;10(2):85–91. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(88)90045-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES