Skip to main content
PMC home page
Canadian Family Physician logoLink to Canadian Family Physician
. 1999 Mar;45:638-40, 643-7.

Obstetrics anyone? How family medicine residents' interests changed.

J Ruderman 1, S G Holzapfel 1, J C Carroll 1, S Cummings 1
PMCID: PMC2328441  PMID: 10099803

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine family medicine residents' attitudes and plans about practising obstetrics when they enter and when they graduate from their residency programs. DESIGN: Residents in each of 4 consecutive years, starting July 1991, were surveyed by questionnaire when they entered the program and again when they graduated (ending in June 1996). Only paired questionnaires were used for analysis. SETTING: Family medicine residency programs at the University of Toronto in Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: Of 358 family medicine residents who completed the University of Toronto program, 215 (60%) completed questionnaires at entry and exit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in attitudes and plans during the residency program as ascertained from responses to entry and exit questionnaires. RESULTS: Analysis was based on 215 paired questionnaires. Women residents had more interest in obstetric practice at entry: 58% of women, but only 31% of men were interested. At graduation, fewer women (49%) and men (22%) were interested in practising obstetrics. The intent to undertake rural practice was strongly associated with the intent to practise obstetrics. By graduation, residents perceived lifestyle factors and compensation as very important negative factors in relation to obstetric practice. Initial interest and the eventual decision to practise obstetrics were strongly associated. CONCLUSIONS: Intent to practise obstetrics after graduation was most closely linked to being a woman, intending to practise in a rural area, and having an interest in obstetrics prior to residency. Building on the interest in obstetrics that residents already have could be a better strategy for producing more physicians willing to practise obstetrics than trying to change the minds of those uninterested in such practice.

Full text

PDF
638

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bredfeldt R., Colliver J. A., Wesley R. M. Present status of obstetrics in family practice and the effects of malpractice issues. J Fam Pract. 1989 Mar;28(3):294–297. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buckle D. Obstetrical practice after a family medicine residency. Can Fam Physician. 1994 Feb;40:261–268. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carroll J. C., Brown J. B., Reid A. J. Female family physicians in obstetrics: achieving personal balance. CMAJ. 1995 Nov 1;153(9):1283–1289. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fletcher J. L., Jr, Schwartz M. P. Obstetrics in family practice. J Fam Pract. 1989 Sep;29(3):239–240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fletcher J. L., Jr, Schwartz M. P. Why family practice residents choose not to practice obstetrics. J Med Assoc Ga. 1989 Aug;78(8):559–561. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Keane D., Woodward C. A., Ferrier B. M., Cohen M., Goldsmith C. H. Female and Male Physicians: Different Practice Profiles: Will increasing numbers of female GPs affect practice patterns of the future? Can Fam Physician. 1991 Jan;37:72–81. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Klein M., Reynolds J. L., Boucher F., Malus M., Rosenberg E. Obstetrical practice and training in canadian family medicine: conserving an endangered species. Can Fam Physician. 1984 Oct;30:2093–2099. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lane C. A., Malm S. M. Innovative low-risk maternity clinic. Family physicians provide care in Calgary. Can Fam Physician. 1997 Jan;43:64–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Larimore W. L. Pregnancy care liability misperceptions among medical students in Florida. Fam Med. 1994 Mar;26(3):154–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Levitt C., Khanlou N., Kaczorowski J., Feldman P., Guibert R., Goulet F., Papageorgiou A., Bardin C., Continelli A., Duarte-Franco E. Attitudes toward obstetrics training. Residents surveyed at McGill University and University of Montreal. Can Fam Physician. 1997 Feb;43:239–246. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. O'Dell M. L., Liese B. S., Price J. G. Obstetrical practices of members of the Kansas Academy of Family Physicians. Kans Med. 1989 Sep;90(9):247-50, 258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Reid A. J., Carroll J. C. Choosing to Practise Obstetrics: What factors influence family practice residents? Can Fam Physician. 1991 Sep;37:1859–1867. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Reynolds J. L. Who Should be Doing Obstetrics in the 1990s? Can Fam Physician. 1988 Sep;34:1937–1940. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rosenblatt R. A., Wright C. L. Rising malpractice premiums and obstetric practice patterns. The impact on family physicians in Washington State. West J Med. 1987 Feb;146(2):246–248. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rosser W. W., Muggah H. Who Will Deliver Canada's Babies in the 1990s? Can Fam Physician. 1989 Dec;35:2419–2424. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rosser W. W., Woodward C. Medicolegal Liability for Ontario Physicians: How the threat affects the scope and style of general practice. Can Fam Physician. 1991 Jun;37:1390–1394. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Woodward C. A., Rosser W. Effect of medicolegal liability on patterns of general and family practice in Canada. CMAJ. 1989 Aug 15;141(4):291–299. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Family Physician are provided here courtesy of College of Family Physicians of Canada

RESOURCES