Skip to main content
HAL-INSERM logoLink to HAL-INSERM
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 May 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2005 Nov;175(9):5751–5758. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.9.5751

Molecular signature of recent thymic selection events on effector and regulatory CD4+ T lymphocytes1

Paola Romagnoli 1,*, Denis Hudrisier 1, Joost Pm Van Meerwijk 1,2
PMCID: PMC2346488  PMID: 16237066

Abstract

Natural CD4+CD25+ regulatory T lymphocytes are key protagonists in induction and maintenance of peripheral T cell tolerance. Their thymic origin and biased repertoire continue to raise important questions on the signals that mediate their development. We validated analysis of MHC class II-capture by developing thymocytes from thymic stroma as a tool to study quantitative and qualitative aspects of the cellular interactions involved in thymic T cell development, and used it to analyze regulatory T cell differentiation in wild type mice. Our data indicate that antigen-presenting cells of bone-marrow origin, but surprisingly and importantly not thymic epithelial cells, induce significant negative selection among the very autoreactive regulatory T cell precursors. This fundamental difference between thymic development of regulatory and effector T lymphocytes leads to development of a regulatory T cell repertoire enriched in cells specific for a selected subpopulation of self-antigens, i.e. those specifically expressed by thymic epithelial cells.

Keywords: Animals, Cell Communication, Hematopoiesis, Histocompatibility Antigens Class II, analysis, Mice, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Inbred DBA, Receptors, Interleukin-2, analysis, T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory, immunology, physiology, Thymus Gland, cytology, immunology

Introduction

Thymic deletion and anergy induction play an essential role in tolerizing the developing T lymphocytes repertoire to self-antigens. Some potentially autoreactive T lymphocytes, however, escape to the periphery where they are kept under control by multiple mechanisms, e.g. induction of anergy, deletion, and suppression by regulatory T cells (Treg). The best-characterized Treg population is composed of CD4+CD25+ T lymphocytes (1, 2). CD4+CD25+ Treg have been shown not only to prevent autoimmunity (35), but also to mediate transplantation tolerance (69), to suppress maternal immune aggression against the fetus (10), and to regulate immunity to viral and parasite infections (11, 12). Their critical role in the generation and maintenance of peripheral tolerance renders them ideal candidates for cell therapy in autoimmunity and transplantation and has sparked interest in how these cells develop. Although recent reports suggest that CD4+CD25+ lymphocytes can also differentiate in the periphery (1316), probably the majority of CD4+CD25+ Treg is generated in the thymus from CD4CD8 precursors (17). In the thymus, CD4+CD25+ Treg appear to be positively selected by cortical epithelial cells (as are conventional effector CD4+ lymphocytes) (18), and have been reported to be susceptible to deletion (1820). The TCR-ligand interaction involved in CD4+CD25+ Treg differentiation has been postulated to be of relative high affinity, to allow peripheral re-activation by self-antigen. Consistent with this hypothesis, increased percentages of CD4+CD25+ Treg have been found in different TCR transgenic mice expressing agonist ligand (2124). However, it has recently been shown that in mice doubly transgenic for another TCR/ligand pair, agonist ligand does not promote CD4+CD25+ Treg differentiation. Rather, the authors concluded that Treg are more resistant to deletion than are conventional CD4+ thymocytes (25). Combined, these data indicate that the nature of the ligand involved in positive selection of Treg remains unknown and that negative selection of Treg precursors remains incompletely understood.

Several years ago, it was shown that mouse T cells do not express I-A determinants (26, 27) but that developing murine thymocytes acquire MHC class II molecules from the thymic microenvironment (28). Transfer of APC-determinants to T cells is a process that has recently been investigated in detail (reviewed in ref. (29) and has been called trogocytosis (30). This process may be involved in T-cell affinity maturation (31) and immunoregulation (32, 33). T cells are known to capture membrane fragments from APC (34), thus acquiring a variety of surface molecules (35). Trogocytosis requires activation of the T cell, but not only the MHC/peptide complexes directly interacting with the TCR are transferred. Thus, in F1 animals, developing T cells acquire MHC class II molecules of both haplotypes (28). However, in chimeric thymi thymocytes acquire mainly one type of MHC class II (36). Combined, these data show that MHC class II molecules are acquired only from the stromal cells that are involved in the activation of the thymocyte. It has been shown that the level of MHC and membrane capture is proportional to the dose of peptide presented by the APC and that it reflects T cell reactivity against APC (34, 35, 37). Therefore, we reasoned that analysis of MHC class II display by different thymocyte subpopulations should shed light on the nature of the cellular interactions involved in the selection of CD25 and CD25+ CD4SP thymocytes. We here report how this approach allowed us to follow the evolution of the Treg-repertoire during the distinct stages of its development, and to evaluate the contribution of the different thymic cellular compartments in this process.

Materials and Methods

Mice

C57Bl/6, DBA/2, BALB/c and DO11.10 TCR transgenic BALB/c mice (38) mice were purchased from the Centre de Recherche et d’Elevage Janvier (Le Genest St. Isle, France). C57Bl/6 mice deficient in β2-microglobulin (39), IAβb (40) and TCRα (41) were obtained from the Centre de Développement des Techniques Avancées-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (Orléans, France All experiments involving animals were performed in compliance with the relevant laws and institutional guidelines (Regional approval N° 31–13).

Antibodies

The following antibodies (abs) and secondary reagents were used for phenotypic analysis: FITC, PE and APC-labeled anti-CD4 (GK1.5), FITC and APC-labeled anti-CD8 (53.6.7), PE-labeled anti-CD25 (PC61), FITC-labeled anti-HSA (M1/69), FITC-labeled anti-TCR (H57), FITC-labeled anti-CD69 (H1.2F3), FITC-labeled anti-CD11c (N418), FITC-labeled anti B220 (RA3-6B2), PE-Cy5.5-labeled Streptavidin (eBioscience, San Diego, CA); FITC-labeled anti-CD44 (IM7), biotin-labeled anti-I-Aβb (AF6-120.1), biotin-labeled anti-Ly-51 (6C3/BP-1), MTS10, FITC-labeled anti-Vβ3 (KJ25), anti-Vβ4 (KT4), anti-Vβ6 (RR4-7), anti-Vβ8 (MR5-2), anti-Vβ12 (MR11-1), anti-Vβ14 (14-2) TCR and biotin-labeled isotype-matched controls (BD PharMingen, Heidelberg, Germany), biotin-labeled anti-I-A/I-E (M5/114).

Flow cytometry

Thymi and lymph nodes were homogenized, washed once in medium, and resuspended in 2.4G2 (anti-FcγR mAb, (42)) hybridoma supernatant. After an incubation of 30 min on ice, saturating concentrations of abs were added. 20 minutes later, cells were washed three times in PBS, 2.5% FCS and 0.02% NaN3 and incubated with the appropriate secondary reagent. Labeled cells were analyzed using a FACSCalibur and CellQuest software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Doublets and dead cells were excluded using appropriate FSC/SSC gates.

In vitro MHC class II decay studies

Thymocytes depleted of CD8+ cells using anti-CD8 mAb (31.M, (43)) and complement (Saxon Europe, Suffolk, U.K.) were cultured in RPMI supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 1mM non essential amino acids, 1mM sodium pyruvate, 1mM HEPES, and antibiotics. At different time points cells were stained with anti-CD4, anti-CD8, anti-CD25 and anti-IAb mAbs.

Bone marrow chimeras

Irradiation bone marrow chimeras were generated by lethally irradiating (8.5 Gy gamma) C57Bl/6 hosts using a 137Cs source (7 Gy/min). The next day, irradiated mice were reconstituted by i.v. injection of 10×106 bone marrow cells depleted of T cells using anti-Thy 1 mAb (AT83, (44)) and complement (Saxon Europe, Suffolk, U.K.). Chimeras were kept on antibiotic containing water (0.2% Bactrim, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) for the complete duration of the experiment (4 weeks).

Statistical analysis

The relative MHC class II expression was calculated as follows: MFI of I-A ÷ MFI of isotype matched control of all the thymic and lymph node subpopulations analyzed. Statistically significant differences between subpopulations were assessed using Student’s t test and are indicated as: * p<0.05; ** p<0.01; ***p<0.001, **** p<0.0001.

Results

Thymocytes capture MHC class II molecules from the thymic microenvironment

It has previously been reported that thymocytes do not express endogenous MHC class II molecules but that they can acquire it from the thymic environment (2628). We verified these findings in mixed bone marrow chimeras generated by lethally irradiating wild type (wt) C57BL/6 animals and reconstituting them with a mixture of MHC class II deficient (Thy1.2) and wt (Thy1.1) bone-marrow (MHC II°+wt→wt). We used mixed bone marrow chimeras to allow developing thymocytes to acquire MHC class II from the radioresistant and radiosensitive cellular elements normally involved in thymic selection. In MHC II°+wt→wt chimeras, CD4SP CD25high, CD4SP CD25 and CD8SP thymocytes generated from MHC II° vs. wt precursors harbored comparable amounts of I-A, confirming that these molecules are acquired from the thymic microenvironment and not expressed endogenously (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Thymocytes acquire MHC class II molecules from the thymic environment.

Figure 1

Lethally irradiated C57Bl/6 hosts were reconstituted with a mixture of bone marrow cells from C57Bl/6 (Thy1.1+) and C57BL/6 MHC II° (Thy1.2+) mice at a 1:1 ratio. Four weeks later, thymocytes were analyzed by four-color flow-cytometry using anti-CD4, anti-CD8, anti-CD25 and anti-IAb. To analyze I-A surface levels on Thy1.1+CD4SP cells, FITC-labeled anti-CD11c, anti-B220 mAbs and FITC-labeled anti-Thy1.2 mAbs were used in addition to FITC-labeled anti-CD8 in the exclusion gate. To analyze I-A surface levels on Thy1.2+CD4SP cells, FITC-labeled anti-Thy1.1 mAb was used in the antibody mixture. A reciprocal staining was performed to analyze I-A surface levels on CD8SP thymocytes. Solid lines indicate I-A staining, dotted lines isotype-matched controls. Bar graphs represent relative I-A expression level on different thymocyte subsets. Error bars indicate SD, n=4 from 2 independent experiments.

MHC class II levels on thymocytes vary according to developmental stage and lineage

We next analyzed if the level of MHC class II found on the surface of distinct thymocyte subsets varied during development. As shown in figures 2A and 2B, we found that the percentage of thymocytes displaying acquired MHC class II molecules increased during differentiation of DP to SP cells. We reproducibly observed a bimodal distribution of MHC class II display, potentially reflecting interaction with limited numbers of selecting niches (45). Interestingly, the amount of I-A displayed by all thymocytes increases with development, as shown by the shift of the total I-A curve. Therefore, to compare the amount of I-A captured by the distinct thymic subpopulations we calculated the relative MHC class II display on the entire population (=MFI I-A ÷ MFI isotype-matched control). As shown in figures 2A and B, some immature CD4+CD8+ (“DP”) thymocytes harbor detectable levels of I-A. CD4+CD8int(ermediate) thymocytes, which only develop in animals expressing at least one class of MHC and therefore have undergone TCR-mediated mediated selection events (46, 47), and mature CD4+CD8 (“CD4SP”) thymocytes carry significantly more I-A than their DP precursors. Finally, mature CD4CD8+ (“CD8SP”) thymocytes display significantly less I-A than CD4SP cells. Therefore, the level of I-A found on thymocytes depends on their developmental stage and lineage.

Figure 2. Displayed MHC class II levels depend on maturation-stage and CD4/CD8 lineage.

Figure 2

A: Total thymocytes from C57Bl/6 mice were analyzed by four-color flow cytometry using anti-CD4, anti-CD8, anti-CD25 and anti-I-Ab (bold line) or isotype-matched control (thin line) abs. To analyze I-A surface levels, FITC-labeled anti-CD11c and anti-B220 mAbs were used in the exclusion gate as described in figure 1. Distinct thymocyte subsets were electronically gated based on CD4/CD8 expression and the respective I-A and 6C3/BP-1 levels were plotted as histograms. B: Bar graphs representing % of I-A positive cells in distinct thymocyte subpopulations (upper panel) and relative I-A expression level on different thymocyte subsets from C57Bl/6 mice (lower panel). All graphic representations of I-A levels were compiled from four independent experiments. Error bars indicate SD, n=10 mice.

It has recently been shown that during their interaction with APC, T cells capture membrane fragments, thus conveying a subset of membrane proteins from the presenting cells (34, 35). We therefore tested if, in addition to I-A, other stroma- or APC-specific proteins could be found on the surface of thymocytes. As shown in figure 2A, we only detected very limited amounts of a cortical epithelium specific antigen (6C3/BP-1) on the different populations of thymocytes. Similar results were obtained using antibodies specific for a medullar antigen (MTS10) or for dendritic cells (CD11c) (data not shown).

Upon TCR-engagement with MHC class I or II, DP thymocytes rapidly upregulate CD69 expression (48). A higher percentage of CD69+ DP thymocytes carry I-A than CD69 cells, suggesting that MHC class II acquisition is an activation-mediated process (Fig. 3A). The absolute level of I-A displayed by I-A+ cells does not change between these two populations (Fig. 1A). To test if MHC class II acquisition is TCR-dependent, we analyzed I-A levels on TCRα-deficient DP thymocytes. As shown in figure 3B, few of these cells harbored limited levels of I-A. These data indicate that MHC class II acquisition by developing T cells heavily depends on TCR-mediated activation. To evaluate if higher avidity interactions result in more MHC class II acquisition during thymocyte development (as previously shown in vitro, (37)), we compared MHC class II display by thymocytes from C57Bl/6 and DBA/2 mice. DBA/2 mice express endogenous superantigens encoded by mammary tumor viruses 1, 6, 7, 8, 11, and 13. These superantigens are high affinity ligands for Vβ3, Vβ6 and Vβ12, 12, while they do not interact with Vβ4, Vβ8 and Vβ14. As a consequence, Vβ3+, Vβ6+, and Vβ12+ thymocytes are deleted during thymic development. C57BL/6 mice do not present these superantigens (49). Since superantigen mediated deletion in DBA/2 mice is already visible at the CD4+CD8int stage, we analyzed I-A display by the CD4lowCD8low (“double dull”) population, which is enriched in cells that have undergone TCR-ligand interactions (50). Interestingly, superantigen-reactive Vβ3+, Vβ6+, and Vβ12+ double dull thymocytes display higher levels of MHC class II in DBA/2 than in C57BL/6 mice, while Vβ4+, Vβ8+ and Vβ14+ cells carry comparable levels of I-A (Fig. 3C). MHC class II amounts were analyzed in both strains with the mAb M5/114 previously shown to have similar affinity for the H-2b and H-2d haplotypes (51). These data indicate that the level of I-A acquired during thymocyte development reflects the avidity of the TCR-ligand interaction involved.

Figure 3. MHC class II acquisition is an avidity-dependent, TCR-activation mediated process.

Figure 3

FACS-histograms and bar graphs represent relative I-A expression level on different thymocyte subsets from the following mice A: C57Bl/6 mice: DP thymocytes were electronically gated according to their CD69 expression level. B: wt and TCRα° C57BL/6 mice: DP thymocytes, in the histogram the two dotted lines depict the isotype matched controls. C: C57Bl/6 and DBA/2 mice: CD4lowCD8low thymocytes were electronically gated. The bar graph (upper panel) represents relative MHC class II display on double dull thymocytes expressing different TCR Vβ, in bold Vβ reactive to Mmtv-encoded superantigens presented in DBA/2 mice, in normal characters the ones that are not. Lower panels: examples of FACS-histograms of I-A display by Vβ 12+ and Vβ8+ thymocytes. D: C57Bl/6 mice: Thymocytes were electronically gated as indicated and I-A display analyzed by FACS. Lower panel: FACS histograms of CD4SP thymocytes gated on HSA expression as indicated. Upper panel: Relative I-A display by the distinct thymocyte subpopulations. E: DO11.10 TCR transgenic mice (analyzed as in D). In panels A, B, and D the anti-MHC class II mAb used was AF6-120.1, M5/114 in panels C and E. In all graphic representations error bars indicate SD, n=4 mice.

We next investigated if thymic negative selection (by induction of anergy or apoptosis) is reflected by a gradual decrease in the acquisition of MHC class II molecules during progression through T cell development. We have not observed any reduction in MHC class II display in CD4SP vs. CD4+CD8int thymocytes. However, CD4SP cells express approximately 1,5-fold higher levels of TCR than their CD4+CD8int precursors (Fig. 4B and C), rendering interpretation of this observation difficult. In contrast, all CD4SP thymocytes express the same high level of TCR. These cells complete their intrathymic differentiation by downmodulating HSA expression (52). It has been shown that HSAhigh, but not HSAlow thymocytes are sensitive to deletion (53). We therefore analyzed I-A levels on CD4SP HSAhigh and HSAlow thymocytes. As shown in figure 3D, HSAhigh CD4SP thymocytes display higher I-A levels than HSAlow cells. These results demonstrate in vivo late negative selection of thymocytes expressing high avidity TCR. To corroborate these findings, we analyzed MHC class II display on HSAhigh and HSAlow CD4SP thymocyes in TCR transgenic mice in which negative selection does not take place. DO11.10 TCR-transgenic CD4SP HSAhigh and CD4SP HSAlow thymocytes display comparable amounts of MHC class II molecules (Fig. 3E), supporting our conclusions.

Figure 4. CD4+CD25high Regulatory T cell precursors display higher levels of I-A on their surface than CD4+CD25 cells.

Figure 4

A: Total thymocytes from C57Bl/6 mice were analyzed by four-color flow cytometry using anti-CD4, anti-CD8, anti-CD25 and anti-I-Ab mAbs, and distinct thymocyte subsets were electronically gated as described in the legend to figure 2. B: Bar graphs representing relative I-A and TCRβ levels on CD4+CD8int and CD4+CD8 thymocytes, electronically gated based on CD25 expression. Error bars indicate SD, n=8. C: CD4+CD8int and CD4+CD8 thymocytes were electronically gated based on CD25 expression and the respective TCR levels were displayed as histograms. Thick lines indicate TCR expression by CD4+CD8int cells, thin lines that of CD4+CD8 cells. D: CD8-depleted thymocytes were cultured in vitro and, at different time points, I-A levels on CD25 and CD25high CD4SP thymocytes were analyzed. Error bars indicate SD, n=3 mice. Similar results were obtained in two independent experiments.

CD25high thymocyte populations display significantly higher levels of MHC class II than CD25 cells

Peripheral CD4SP CD25+ T cells with regulatory function express high levels of CD25 at their surface and all CD4+CD25high T cells express Foxp3 (54, 55). FACS analysis using anti-Foxp3 antibody showed that also in the thymus all CD4+CD25high cells express Foxp3 (PR, data not shown). The majority of T cells expressing intermediate levels of CD25 do not have immunomodulatory capacity, do not express Foxp3, and (at least in the periphery) do not appear to have the potential to become Foxp3 expressing CD25high cells (54, 55). We therefore limited our analysis to CD25high thymocytes. This population is readily detectable in the thymus (Fig. 4A). Distinguishable regulatory TCR+CD25high T cell-precursors start to appear in the CD4+CD8int population (24, 55). We therefore analyzed MHC class II levels on CD25high regulatory thymocyte-precursors at the intermediate and SP stage and compared them to those on CD25 cells with equivalent CD4/CD8 phenotypes. Interestingly, CD4+CD8intCD25high cells display significantly higher levels of MHC class II than CD4+CD8intCD25 thymocytes (Figs. 4A and B). At the SP stage this level decreases, but still remains significantly higher than on CD25 cells (Figs. 4A and B).

CD4+CD8int and CD4SP, CD25 and CD25high cells do not express identical TCR-levels (Fig. 4C and Fig. 4B, lower panel). We observed that CD25 CD4+CD8int cells expressed lower TCR-levels than CD25high cells. CD25 CD4SP cells expressed approximately 1,5-fold higher TCR-levels than CD25high cells. CD25high CD4+CD8int and CD4SP cells expressed similar TCR-levels. These differences in TCR-levels might contribute somewhat to the differences in MHC class II capture by CD4+CD8int CD25 and CD25high thymocytes we observed. In contrast, they can only emphasize the differences in MHC class II-capture by CD4SP CD25 and CD25high cells.

Higher levels of I-A on CD4+CD25high cells could result from a longer half life of these molecules on the cell surface of CD25high or from increased capture. To distinguish between these two possibilities, we analyzed the kinetics of MHC class II decay on CD25high cells cultured in the absence of APC. As shown in figure 4D, I-A on CD4+CD25high and CD4+CD25 thymocytes decays with similar kinetics. Taken together, these results indicate that TCR+CD25high thymocytes capture significantly more MHC class II molecules than CD25 cells. Furthermore, these data show that the presence of captured MHC class II at the surface of thymocytes is transient and that the in vivo I-A display we observed requires continuous interaction with stromal thymic cells (56). Moreover, the level of MHC class II display reflects avidity of recent interactions with thymic stromal cells.

MHC class II harbored by thymocytes is acquired from thymic epithelium as well as from cells of hematopoietic origin

To evaluate if the variation in MHC class II levels found between CD25 and CD25high cells is due to differences in acquisition from (radioresistant) thymic epithelium and/or from (radiosensitive) antigen-presenting cells of hematopoietic origin (APC), we next generated bone-marrow chimeras by lethally irradiating wild type C57BL/6 animals and reconstituting them with MHC class II deficient bone-marrow (MHC II°→wt). DP thymocytes from MHC II°→wt animals harbored I-A levels comparable to those on DP thymocytes isolated from control wt→wt chimeras, indicating that at this developmental stage thymocytes mainly interact with radioresistant thymic (cortical) epithelium (Figs. 5A and B). I-A levels on the more mature CD4+CD8int and CD4SP thymic populations were significantly lower in MHC II°→wt than in wt→wt chimeras (Figs. 5A and B). These results indicate that a significant portion of the MHC class II found on more mature thymocytes is acquired from APC. Therefore, levels of MHC class II displayed by thymocyte-populations developing in the different chimeras cannot be compared.

Figure 5. Regulatory T cell precursors are negatively selected by APC but not by thymic epithelial cells.

Figure 5

A: Lethally irradiated C57Bl/6 hosts were reconstituted with bone marrow cells from either MHC II° or wt C57Bl/6 mice. I-A levels on distinct thymocyte subsets were analyzed by flow-cytometry as described in the legend to figure 2. B/C/D: I-A levels on distinct thymocyte subsets from MHC II°→wt and wt→wt chimeras are displayed in bar graphs. Error bars indicate SD, n=5. Results from one same experiment are shown; two more independent experiments gave similar results.

Because of negative selection, fully mature HSAlow CD4SP thymocytes harbor lower levels of MHC class II than their HSAhigh precursors (that express identical levels of TCR, Figs. 3D and E). To evaluate the contribution of epithelial cells in this negative selection, we analyzed I-A levels on HSAhigh and HSAlow CD4SP thymocytes from MHC II°→wt chimeras. As shown in figure 5C, despite absence of negative selection by APC in these chimeras, HSAlow cells displayed significantly less I-A than their HSAhigh precursors. This result is consistent with the known role of medullary epithelial cells in anergy induction and deletion of autoreactive cells (5759).

CD25high regulatory T cell-precursors are negatively selected by APC but not by thymic epithelial cells

We then analyzed the contribution of epithelial cells and APC to negative selection of CD25high thymocytes. Since all CD4+CD25high thymocytes display a mature phenotype, expressing low levels of HSA (ref. 17, and data not shown), the two last identifiable stages of Treg development are the CD4+CD8int and CD4+CD8 stages. Importantly, CD25high CD4+CD8int and CD4+CD8 cells express identical TCR-levels (Fig. 4C). We therefore analyzed MHC class II display by these two CD25high thymocyte subsets (Fig. 5D). In MHC II°→wt chimeras, CD25high CD4SP thymocytes and their CD4+CD8int precursors harbored similar levels of MHC class II. This result indicates that thymic epithelial cells do not induce significant negative selection of regulatory T cell precursors. In contrast, in wt→wt chimeras, in which APC express MHC class II, CD25high CD4SP thymocytes display lower levels of MHC class II than CD4+CD8int (Fig. 5D). Combined, these data show that regulatory T cell precursors are sensitive to negative selection induced by APC.

To corroborate this conclusion we compared MHC class II acquisition by fully mature CD25 and CD25high thymocytes from thymic epithelium in MHC II° → wt chimeras. Fully mature CD4SP CD25high thymocytes (that are all HSAlow) acquired significantly more MHC class II from thymic epithelium than fully mature CD4SP HSAlow (mainly CD25) cells (compare hatched bars in Figs. 5C and D, p<0.01).

Peripheral CD4+CD25high regulatory T lymphocytes display more I-A than CD4+CD25 cells

Peripheral T lymphocytes from TCR transgenic mice have previously been shown to display MHC class II molecules (32). To determine if this was also detectable in wildtype mice, we analyzed I-A levels on CD25high and CD25 CD4+ T lymphocytes isolated from lymph nodes. CD4+CD25high lymphocytes harbor significantly higher levels of MHC class II than CD4+CD25 cells (Fig. 6A).

Figure 6. Resting and activated peripheral regulatory CD4+CD25high lymphocytes display higher I-A levels than CD4+CD25 cells.

Figure 6

A: I-A surface levels were analyzed on CD25 and CD25high CD4+CD8CD11c CD11cB220 lymphocytes isolated from lymph nodes of C57Bl/6 mice. The data are displayed as FACS-histograms (Left panel) and data from multiple experiments shown as bar graphs (middle panel). Right panel: MHC class II expression by lymph node B220+ cells. error bars represent SD, n=5). B: I-A levels on resting (CD69low) and recently activated (CD69hi) CD4+CD25high and CD4+CD25 T lymphocyte subsets from lymph nodes of C57Bl/6 mice. Right panel: Relative I-A expression levels are depicted for 5 individual mice, indicated with distinctive symbols.

The lower I-A level observed on peripheral T lymphocytes as compared to thymocytes (compare Figs. 6A and 4A/B) could be due either to TCR tuning (60) or to less frequent encounters with antigen (61). To distinguish between these two possibilities, we analyzed the MHC class II levels displayed by activated and resting CD4+ lymph node cells. As shown in figure 6B, activated CD69high T lymphocytes displayed higher MHC class II levels than the corresponding resting populations (CD69low), indicating that the relatively low I-A level on peripheral T cells is mainly due to rare antigen-encounter. Finally, both resting (CD69low) and recently activated (CD69high) CD25high cells carry significantly higher amounts of I-A than corresponding CD25 lymphocytes (Fig. 6B, right). Furthermore, they support the view that the Treg repertoire, enriched during thymic selection in cells bearing TCR with high avidity for self-ligand, is maintained in the periphery.

Discussion

In this report we show that the level of MHC class II display by developing thymocytes correlates with the avidity of their recent interactions with thymic stromal cells, and can therefore be used to monitor quantitative and qualitative aspects of cellular interactions involved in T cell development. Using this molecular signature of thymic selection events, we show that precursors of CD25 effector and CD25high regulatory T lymphocytes are both efficiently negatively selected by APC of bone-marrow origin. In contrast, while thymic epithelial cells efficiently negatively select effector T cell precursors, they only marginally (if at all) induce negative selection of regulatory T cell precursors.

In vitro capture of MHC II molecules by T cell clones is an activation-mediated process (34, 35, 37). In the thymus, a larger fraction of newly positively selected DP CD69+ than CD69 cells carry MHC class II. Moreover, only few DP thymocytes from TCRα-deficient mice display I-A on their surface and in significantly less quantity than wt cells. Taken together, these data indicate that also MHC class II acquisition by developing thymocytes is predominantly a TCR-mediated activation-dependent process. Since acquired MHC class II was rapidly lost in absence of MHC class II expressing APC, the level of MHC class II displayed by thymocytes reflects the level of active acquisition of these molecules. Moreover, superantigen-reactive (but not yet deleted) thymocytes acquired higher levels of MHC class II, indicating that the avidity of the developing thymocytes for thymic stromal cells determines the level of MHC class II acquisition.

MHC class II acquisition depends on the developmental stage and lineage of thymocytes, with CD4SP T cells harboring significantly higher amounts of MHC class II than DP and CD8SP cells. On the latter cells, I-A has probably been “passively” acquired via trogocytosis during cellular contacts mediated by TCR/MHC class I interaction. Alternatively, but less likely, it may be the result of a direct TCR/MHC class II interaction-mediated process, consistently with the observation that class II-restricted CD8 T cells arise in CD4° mice (6264).

Bone marrow chimeras expressing MHC II/peptide complexes on radioresistant (epithelial) cells but not on radiosensitive (bone-marrow-derived) cells revealed that developing thymocytes can capture MHC class II molecules from both thymic epithelium and bone-marrow derived APC. CD4+CD8+ DP thymocytes appear to capture MHC class II exclusively from the thymic epithelium, while the more mature CD4+CD8int and CD4+CD8 thymocyte-populations acquire I-A from epithelial cells and from APC. These results are in agreement with spatial and temporal aspects of thymocyte selection. Based on TCR affinity for self-peptide/MHC complexes, DP thymocytes localized in the cortex can undergo positive selection. Positively selected cells then migrate to the medulla where, via interactions with medullary epithelium and APC of bone-marrow origin, potentially autoreactive cells undergo negative selection.

Previous reports showing that thymocytes derived from F1 into parent (F1→P) bone marrow chimeras mainly carry MHC determinants of host origin (28) are not at odds with our present findings. Thymocytes are positively selected only if their TCR are of sufficiently high affinity for self-ligands expressed by radioresistant cortical epithelial cells (65, 66). Consequently, thymocytes that have been positively selected express TCR specific for host-type MHC, and therefore mainly interact with host type APC and capture host-type MHC determinants in bone marrow chimeras. In line with this, it has also been shown that in MHC haplotype-mosaic stromal environments individual thymocytes preferentially acquire only one of the two MHC determinants (36). Importantly, MHC class II acquisition is not limited to the MHC/peptide complexes with which the thymocyte’s TCR interact. On the other hand, thymocytes will only acquire MHC class II from stromal cells for which they have sufficiently high avidity.

Mature thymic regulatory CD4SP CD25high cells display higher amounts of MHC class II molecules than conventional CD4SP CD25 thymocytes. Since the stability of acquired MHC class II on these two subsets is comparable, the higher expression is due to increased acquisition from thymic stromal cells. As discussed before, the level of MHC class II acquisition reflects the avidity of the developing thymocytes for thymic stroma. Our results therefore indicate that the normally diverse CD4SP CD25high regulatory thymocyte population selected on naturally expressed ligands, has higher avidity for self than CD4SP CD25 cells. The greater avidity of Treg may be caused by higher avidity (despite lower TCR-expression levels) and/or affinity TCR, by differences in expression of adhesion molecules, and/or by higher intrinsic reactivity.

Also immature CD4+CD8intCD25high thymocytes capture much higher amounts of MHC class II than the corresponding CD25 population. This result is consistent with a potential role for high-affinity affinity ligands in the selection of regulatory T cells, as previously proposed (2125). Interestingly, mature CD4SP CD25high thymocytes acquire significantly less MHC class II molecules than their more immature precursors. This reduction in self-reactivity was mainly due to interactions with bone-marrow derived cells and to a much lower extend (if at all) to interactions with epithelial cells. These observations indicate that a significant part of the regulatory T cell precursors is negatively selected after interaction with APC. In contrast, direct interactions with thymic epithelial cells hardly reduced the self-reactivity (by deletion or anergy-induction) of regulatory T cell precursors. These data are consistent with earlier reports on induction of CD4+ T cell-mediated dominant tolerance by grafting thymic epithelium (67). Therefore, our data provide an explanation for apparently contradictory reports in the literature showing sensitivity as well as resistance to deletion of thymic regulatory T cell precursors (19, 20, 25). They also show for the first time in one single system and for an unmanipulated TCR-Mature repertoire that regulatory T cell precursors are sensitive to negative selection induced by APC but hardly (if at all) by thymic epithelial cells. Although thymic APC are known to present some medullary epithelium-derived antigens (59), and may therefore delete some tissue-specific antigen-reactive CD25high precursors, this is unlikely to be the case for all antigens expressed by mTEC (25, 68). The observation that Treg precursors are sensitive to deletion by APC but not by (m)TEC therefore indicates that the mature Treg repertoire is pruned of cells specific for e.g. household antigens and thus relatively enriched in cells recognizing the tissue-specific antigens expressed by mTEC.

Several reports have documented the important role of MHC molecules in homeostasis of the peripheral pool of T lymphocytes (reviewed by (69). The MHC class II display by peripheral CD4+ T cells we observed is consistent with such a role. We also document that resting and activated peripheral regulatory CD4+CD25high T cells display higher levels of MHC class II than the corresponding CD25 populations. These results support our previous findings indicating that the Treg repertoire in enriched in autoreactive T cells (19), and more recent data documenting the role of self-antigen in the peripheral expansion of regulatory T cells (7072).

In conclusion, using MHC class II-transfer as a tool to analyze the nature of cellular interactions involved in T lymphocyte-selection, we have shown that an autoreactive regulatory T cell repertoire is selected already early during thymic development. Negative selection subsequently significantly prunes this repertoire of cells overly reactive to antigens specifically presented by APC but not by epithelial cells, thus generating a fully mature regulatory T cell population with biased specificity for a subpopulation of autoantigens, among which “tissue-specific” antigens expressed by thymic specific” medullary epithelium (73).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the staff of the IFR30 animal facility, and in particular Maryline Calise, for expert animal husbandry. We thank Drs. Rob MacDonald, Jean-Charles Guéry, and Etienne Joly for critical reading of the manuscript.

Abbreviations used in this paper

Treg

regulatory T lymphocyte

MFI

mean fluorescence intensity

DP

double positive

SP

single positive

mTEC

medullary thymic epithelial cell

Footnotes

1

This work was supported by a grant from the European Community awarded to the EuroThymaide consortium (contract # LSHB-CT-2003-503410).

This is an author-produced version of a manuscript accepted for publication in The Journal of Immunology (The JI). The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. (AAI), publisher of The JI, holds the copyright to this manuscript. This manuscript has not yet been copyedited or subjected to editorial proofreading by The JI; hence it may differ from the final version published in The JI (online and in print). AAI (The JI) is not liable for errors or omissions in this author-produced version of the manuscript or in any version derived from it by the United States National Institutes of Health or any other third party. The final, citable version of record can be found at www.jimmunol.org

References

  • 1.Sakaguchi S, Sakaguchi N, Asano M, Itoh M, Toda M. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor alpha-chains (CD25). Breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J Immunol. 1995;155:1151–1164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Asano M, Toda M, Sakaguchi N, Sakaguchi S. Autoimmune disease as a consequence of developmental abnormality of a T cell subpopulation. J Exp Med. 1996;184:387–396. doi: 10.1084/jem.184.2.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shevach EM. Regulatory T cells in autoimmmunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2000;18:423–449. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.18.1.423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sakaguchi S. Regulatory T cells: key controllers of immunologic self-tolerance. Cell. 2000;101:455–458. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80856-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Maloy KJ, Powrie F. Regulatory T cells in the control of immune pathology. Nat Immunol. 2001;2:816–822. doi: 10.1038/ni0901-816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Taylor PA, Lees CJ, Blazar BR. The infusion of ex vivo activated and expanded CD4(+)CD25(+) immune regulatory cells inhibits graft-versus-host disease lethality. Blood. 2002;99:3493–3499. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.10.3493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hoffmann P, Ermann J, Edinger M, Fathman CG, Strober S. Donor-type CD4(+)CD25(+) Regulatory T Cells Suppress Lethal Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease after Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation. J Exp Med. 2002;196:389–399. doi: 10.1084/jem.20020399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cohen JL, Trenado A, Vasey D, Klatzmann D, Salomon BL. CD4(+)CD25(+) Immunoregulatory T Cells: New Therapeutics for Graft-Versus-Host Disease. J Exp Med. 2002;196:401–406. doi: 10.1084/jem.20020090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Joffre O, Gorsse N, Romagnoli P, Hudrisier D, van Meerwijk JP. Induction of antigen-specific tolerance to bone marrow allografts with CD4+CD25+ T lymphocytes. Blood. 2004;103:4216–4221. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-01-0005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Aluvihare VR, Kallikourdis M, Betz AG. Regulatory T cells mediate maternal tolerance to the fetus. Nat Immunol. 2004;5:266–271. doi: 10.1038/ni1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Suvas S, Kumaraguru U, Pack CD, Lee S, Rouse BT. CD4+CD25+ T Cells Regulate Virus-specific Primary and Memory CD8+ T Cell Responses. J Exp Med. 2003;198:889–901. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Belkaid Y, Piccirillo CA, Mendez S, Shevach EM, Sacks DL. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells control Leishmania major persistence and immunity. Nature. 2002;420:502–507. doi: 10.1038/nature01152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Thorstenson KM, Khoruts A. Generation of anergic and potentially immunoregulatory CD25+CD4 T cells in vivo after induction of peripheral tolerance with intravenous or oral antigen. J Immunol. 2001;167:188–195. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.1.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Apostolou I, Von Boehmer H. In vivo instruction of suppressor commitment in naive T cells. J Exp Med. 2004;199:1401–1408. doi: 10.1084/jem.20040249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Curotto de Lafaille MA, Lino AC, Kutchukhidze N, Lafaille JJ. CD25− T cells generate CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells by peripheral expansion. J Immunol. 2004;173:7259–7268. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.12.7259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liang S, Alard P, Zhao Y, Parnell S, Clark SL, Kosiewicz MM. Conversion of CD4+ CD25− cells into CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells in vivo requires B7 costimulation, but not the thymus. J Exp Med. 2005;201:127–137. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Itoh M, Takahashi T, Sakaguchi N, Kuniyasu Y, Shimizu J, Otsuka F, Sakaguchi S. Thymus and autoimmunity: production of CD25+CD4+ naturally anergic and suppressive T cells as a key function of the thymus in maintaining immunologic self-tolerance. J Immunol. 1999;162:5317–5326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bensinger SJ, Bandeira A, Jordan MS, Caton AJ, Laufer TM. Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II-positive Cortical Epithelium Mediates the Selection of CD4+25+ Immunoregulatory T Cells. J Exp Med. 2001;194:427–438. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.4.427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Romagnoli P, Hudrisier D, van Meerwijk JPM. Preferential recognition of self-antigens despite normal thymic deletion of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 2002;168:1644–1648. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.4.1644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pacholczyk R, Kraj P, Ignatowicz L. Peptide specificity of thymic selection of CD4+CD25+ T cells. J Immunol. 2002;168:613–620. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.2.613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kawahata K, Misaki Y, Yamauchi M, Tsunekawa S, Setoguchi K, Miyazaki J-i, Yamamoto K. Generation of CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cells from Autoreactive T Cells Simultaneously with Their Negative Selection in the Thymus and from Nonautoreactive T Cells by Endogenous TCR Expression. J Immunol. 2002;168:4399–4405. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.9.4399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Apostolou I, Sarukhan A, Klein L, von Boehmer H. Origin of regulatory T cells with known specificity for antigen. Nat Immunol. 2002;3:756–763. doi: 10.1038/ni816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jordan MS, Riley MP, von Boehmer H, Caton AJ. Anergy and suppression regulate CD4(+) T cell responses to a self peptide. Eur J Immunol. 2000;30:136–144. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200001)30:1<136::AID-IMMU136>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jordan MS, Boesteanu A, Reed AJ, Petrone AL, Holenbeck AE, Lerman MA, Naji A, Caton AJ. Thymic selection of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells induced by an agonist self-peptide. Nat Immunol. 2001;2:301–306. doi: 10.1038/86302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.van Santen HM, Benoist C, Mathis D. Number of T reg cells that differentiate does not increase upon encounter of agonist ligand on thymic epithelial cells. J Exp Med. 2004;200:1221–1230. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Benoist C, Mathis D. Regulation of major histocompatibility complex class-II genes: X, Y and other letters of the alphabet. Annu Rev Immunol. 1990;8:681–715. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.08.040190.003341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chang CH, Hong SC, Hughes CC, Janeway CA, Jr, Flavell RA. CIITA activates the expression of MHC class II genes in mouse T cells. Int Immunol. 1995;7:1515–1518. doi: 10.1093/intimm/7.9.1515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sharrow SO, Mathieson BJ, Singer A. Cell surface appearance of unexpected host MHC determinants on thymocytes from radiation bone marrow chimeras. J Immunol. 1981;126:1327–1335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hudrisier D, Bongrand P. Intercellular transfer of antigen-presenting cell determinants onto T cells: molecular mechanisms and biological significance. Faseb J. 2002;16:477–486. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0933rev. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Joly E, Hudrisier D. What is trogocytosis and what is its purpose? Nat Immunol. 2003;4:815. doi: 10.1038/ni0903-815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kedl RM, Schaefer BC, Kappler JW, Marrack P. T cells down-modulate peptide-MHC complexes on APCs in vivo. Nat Immunol. 2002;3:27–32. doi: 10.1038/ni742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tsang JY, Chai JG, Lechler R. Antigen presentation by mouse CD4+ T cells involving acquired MHC class II:peptide complexes: another mechanism to limit clonal expansion? Blood. 2003;101:2704–2710. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-04-1230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang ZX, Yang L, Young KJ, DuTemple B, Zhang L. Identification of a previously unknown antigen-specific regulatory T cell and its mechanism of suppression. Nat Med. 2000;6:782–789. doi: 10.1038/77513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hudrisier D, Riond J, Mazarguil H, Gairin JE, Joly E. Cutting edge: CTLs rapidly capture membrane fragments from target cells in a TCR signaling-dependent manner. J Immunol. 2001;166:3645–3649. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.6.3645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hwang I, Huang JF, Kishimoto H, Brunmark A, Peterson PA, Jackson MR, Surh CD, Cai Z, Sprent J. T cells can use either T cell receptor or CD28 receptors to absorb and internalize cell surface molecules derived from antigen-presenting cells. J Exp Med. 2000;191:1137–1148. doi: 10.1084/jem.191.7.1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Merkenschlager M. Tracing interactions of thymocytes with individual stromal cell partners. Eur J Immunol. 1996;26:892–896. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830260426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Huang JF, Yang Y, Sepulveda H, Shi W, Hwang I, Peterson PA, Jackson MR, Sprent J, Cai Z. TCR-Mediated internalization of peptide-MHC complexes acquired by T cells. Science. 1999;286:952–954. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5441.952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Murphy KM, Heimberger AB, Loh DY. Induction by antigen of intrathymic apoptosis of CD4+CD8+TCRlo thymocytes in vivo. Science. 1990;250:1720–1723. doi: 10.1126/science.2125367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Koller BH, Marrack P, Kappler JW, Smithies O. Normal development of mice deficient in β2M, MHC class I proteins, and CD8+ T cells. Science. 1990;248:1227–1230. doi: 10.1126/science.2112266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cosgrove D, Gray D, Dierich A, Kaufman J, Lemeur M, Benoist C, Mathis D. Mice lacking MHC class II molecules. Cell. 1991;66:1051–1066. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90448-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Philpott KL, Viney JL, Kay G, Rastan S, Gardiner EM, Chae S, Hayday AC, Owen MJ. Lymphoid development in mice congenitally lacking T cell receptor alpha beta-expressing cells. Science. 1992;256:1448–1452. doi: 10.1126/science.1604321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Unkeless JC. Characterization of a monoclonal antibody directed against mouse macrophage and lymphocyte Fc receptors. J Exp Med. 1979;150:580–596. doi: 10.1084/jem.150.3.580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sarmiento M, Dialynas DP, Lancki DW, Wall KA, Lorber MI, Loken MR, Fitch FW. Cloned T lymphocytes and monoclonal antibodies as probes for cell surface molecules active in T cell-mediated cytolysis. Immunol Rev. 1982;68:135–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1982.tb01063.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sarmiento M, Loken MR, Fitch FW. Structural differences in cell surface T25 polypeptides from thymocytes and cloned T cells. Hybridoma. 1981;1:13–26. doi: 10.1089/hyb.1.1981.1.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.van Meerwijk JP, Marguerat S, MacDonald HR. Homeostasis limits the development of mature CD8+ but not CD4+ thymocytes. J Immunol. 1998;160:2730–2734. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chan SH, Cosgrove D, Waltzinger C, Benoist C, Mathis D. Another view of the selective model of thymocyte selection. Cell. 1993;73:225–236. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90225-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.van Meerwijk JPM, O’Connell EM, Germain RN. Evidence for lineage commitment and initiation of positive selection by thymocytes with intermediate surface phenotypes. J Immunol. 1995;154:6314–6324. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yokoyama WM, Koning F, Kehn PJ, Pereira GM, Stingl G, Coligan JE, Shevach EM. Characterization of a cell surface-expressed disulfide-linked dimer involved in murine T cell activation. J Immunol. 1988;141:369–376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Luther SA, Acha-Orbea H. Mouse mammary tumor virus: immunological interplays between virus and host. Adv Immunol. 1997;65:139–243. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hogquist KA, Tomlinson AJ, Kieper WC, McGargill MA, Hart MC, Naylor S, Jameson SC. Identification of a naturally occurring ligand for thymic positive selection. Immunity. 1997;6:389–399. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80282-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bhattacharya A, Dorf ME, Springer TA. A shared alloantigenic determinant on Ia antigens encoded by the I-A and I-E subregions: evidence for I region gene duplication. J Immunol. 1981;127:2488–2495. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ramsdell F, Jenkins M, Dinh Q, Fowlkes BJ. The majority of CD4+8− thymocytes are functionally immature. J Immunol. 1991;147:1779–1785. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kishimoto H, Sprent J. Negative selection in the thymus includes semimature T cells. J Exp Med. 1997;185:263–271. doi: 10.1084/jem.185.2.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Setoguchi R, Hori S, Takahashi T, Sakaguchi S. Homeostatic maintenance of natural Foxp3(+) CD25(+) CD4(+) regulatory T cells by interleukin (IL)-2 and induction of autoimmune disease by IL-2 neutralization. J Exp Med. 2005;201:723–735. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Fontenot JD, Rasmussen JP, Williams LM, Dooley JL, Farr AG, Rudensky AY. Regulatory T cell lineage specification by the forkhead transcription factor foxp3. Immunity. 2005;22:329–341. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kisielow P, Miazek A. Positive selection of T cells: rescue from programmed cell death and differentiation require continual engagement of the T cell receptor. J Exp Med. 1995;181:1975–1984. doi: 10.1084/jem.181.6.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ramsdell F, Lantz T, Fowlkes BJ. A nondeletional mechanism of thymic self tolerance. Science. 1989;246:1038–1041. doi: 10.1126/science.2511629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Klein L, Roettinger B, Kyewski B. Sampling of complementing self-antigen pools by thymic stromal cells maximizes the scope of central T cell tolerance. Eur J Immunol. 2001;31:2476–2486. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200108)31:8<2476::aid-immu2476>3.0.co;2-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gallegos AM, Bevan MJ. Central tolerance to tissue-specific antigens mediated by direct and indirect antigen presentation. J Exp Med. 2004;200:1039–1049. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lucas B, Stefanova I, Yasutomo K, Dautigny N, Germain RN. Divergent changes in the sensitivity of maturing T cells to structurally related ligands underlies formation of a useful T cell repertoire. Immunity. 1999;10:367–376. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80036-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Davey GM, Schober SL, Endrizzi BT, Dutcher AK, Jameson SC, Hogquist KA. Preselection thymocytes are more sensitive to T cell receptor stimulation than mature T cells. J Exp Med. 1998;188:1867–1874. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.10.1867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Matechak EO, Killeen N, Hedrick SM, Fowlkes BJ. MHC class II-specific T cells can develop in the CD8 lineage when CD4 is absent. Immunity. 1996;4:337–347. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80247-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Tyznik AJ, Sun JC, Bevan MJ. The CD8 Population in CD4-deficient Mice Is Heavily Contaminated with MHC Class II-restricted T Cells. J Exp Med. 2004;199:559–565. doi: 10.1084/jem.20031961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lucas B, Vasseur F, Penit C. Stochastic coreceptor shut-off is restricted to the CD4 lineage maturation pathway. J Exp Med. 1995;181:1623–1633. doi: 10.1084/jem.181.5.1623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Laufer TM, DeKoning J, Markowitz JS, Lo D, Glimcher LH. Unopposed positive selection and autoreactivity in mice expressing class II MHC only on thymic cortex. Nature. 1996;383:81–85. doi: 10.1038/383081a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Capone M, Romagnoli P, Beermann F, MacDonald HR, van Meerwijk JPM. Dissociation of thymic positive and negative selection in transgenic mice expressing major histocompatibility complex class I molecules exclusively on thymic cortical epithelial cells. Blood. 2001;97:1336–1342. doi: 10.1182/blood.v97.5.1336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Le Douarin N, Corbel C, Bandeira A, Thomas-Vaslin V, Modigliani Y, Coutinho A, Salaun J. Evidence for a thymus-dependent form of tolerance that is not based on elimination or anergy of reactive T cells. Immunol Rev. 1996;149:35–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1996.tb00898.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Oukka M, Colucci-Guyon E, Tran PL, Cohen-Tannoudji M, Babinet C, Lotteau V, Kosmatopoulos K. CD4 T cell tolerance to nuclear proteins induced by medullary thymic epithelium. Immunity. 1996;4:545–553. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80481-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Freitas AA, Rocha B. Peripheral T cell survival. Curr Opin Immunol. 1999;11:152–156. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(99)80026-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Fisson S, Darrasse-Jeze G, Litvinova E, Septier F, Klatzmann D, Liblau R, Salomon BL. Continuous activation of autoreactive CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells in the steady state. J Exp Med. 2003;198:737–746. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Walker LSK, Chodos A, Eggena M, Dooms H, Abbas AK. Antigen-dependent Proliferation of CD4+ CD25+ Regulatory T Cells In Vivo. J Exp Med. 2003;198:249–258. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hsieh CS, Liang Y, Tyznik AJ, Self SG, Liggitt D, Rudensky AY. Recognition of the Peripheral Self by Naturally Arising CD25(+) CD4(+) T Cell Receptors. Immunity. 2004;21:267–277. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Derbinski J, Schulte A, Kyewski B, Klein L. Promiscuous gene expression in medullary thymic epithelial cells mirrors the peripheral self. Nat Immunol. 2001;2:1032–1039. doi: 10.1038/ni723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES