Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1996 Apr 20;312(7037):1016–1020. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7037.1016

Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient generated measure, MYMOP, compared with the SF-36 health survey.

C Paterson 1
PMCID: PMC2350813  PMID: 8616351

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To assess the sensitivity to within person change over time of an outcome measure for practitioners in primary care that is applicable to a wide range of illness. DESIGN--Comparison of a new patient generated instrument, the measure yourself medical outcome profile (MYMOP), with the SF-36 health profile and a five point change score; all scales were completed during the consultation with' practitioners and repeated after four weeks. 103 patients were followed up for 16 weeks and their results charted; seven practitioners were interviewed. SETTING--Established practice of the four NHS general practitioners and four of the private complementary practitioners working in one medical centre. SUBJECTS--Systematic sample of 218 patients from general practice and all 47 patients of complementary practitioners; patients had had symptoms for more than seven days. OUTCOME MEASURES--Standardised response mean and index of responsiveness; view of practitioners. RESULTS--The index of responsiveness, relating to the minimal clinically important difference, was high for MYMOP: 1.4 for the first symptom, 1.33 for activity, and 0.85 for the profile compared with < 0.45 for SF-36. MYMOP's validity was supported by significant correlation between the change score and the change in the MYMOP score and the ability of this instrument to detect more improvement in acute than in chronic conditions. Practitioners found that MYMOP was practical and applicable to all patients with symptoms and that its use increased their awareness of patients' priorities. CONCLUSION--MYMOP shows promise as an outcome measure for primary care and for complementary treatment. It is more sensitive to change than the SF-36 and has the added bonus of improving patient-practitioner communication.

Full text

PDF
1016

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brazier J. E., Harper R., Jones N. M., O'Cathain A., Thomas K. J., Usherwood T., Westlake L. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992 Jul 18;305(6846):160–164. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Garratt A. M., Macdonald L. M., Ruta D. A., Russell I. T., Buckingham J. K., Krukowski Z. H. Towards measurement of outcome for patients with varicose veins. Qual Health Care. 1993 Mar;2(1):5–10. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Garratt A. M., Ruta D. A., Abdalla M. I., Buckingham J. K., Russell I. T. The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? BMJ. 1993 May 29;306(6890):1440–1444. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6890.1440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Guyatt G. H., Berman L. B., Townsend M., Pugsley S. O., Chambers L. W. A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease. Thorax. 1987 Oct;42(10):773–778. doi: 10.1136/thx.42.10.773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Guyatt G. H., Eagle D. J., Sackett B., Willan A., Griffith L., McIlroy W., Patterson C. J., Turpie I. Measuring quality of life in the frail elderly. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Dec;46(12):1433–1444. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90143-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Guyatt G. H., Kirshner B., Jaeschke R. Measuring health status: what are the necessary measurement properties? J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Dec;45(12):1341–1345. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90194-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Guyatt G., Walter S., Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(2):171–178. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90069-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Howie J. G. Research in general practice: pursuit of knowledge or defence of wisdom? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Dec 22;289(6460):1770–1772. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6460.1770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Katz J. N., Larson M. G., Phillips C. B., Fossel A. H., Liang M. H. Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care. 1992 Oct;30(10):917–925. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199210000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kinnersley P., Peters T., Stott N. Measuring functional health status in primary care using the COOP-WONCA charts: acceptability, range of scores, construct validity, reliability and sensitivity to change. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Dec;44(389):545–549. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MacKenzie C. R., Charlson M. E., DiGioia D., Kelley K. Can the Sickness Impact Profile measure change? An example of scale assessment. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(6):429–438. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90110-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. O'Boyle C. A., McGee H., Hickey A., O'Malley K., Joyce C. R. Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement. Lancet. 1992 May 2;339(8801):1088–1091. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90673-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Paterson C., Peacock W. Complementary practitioners as part of the primary health care team: evaluation of one model. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 May;45(394):255–258. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Phillips R. C., Lansky D. J. Outcomes management in heart valve replacement surgery: early experience. J Heart Valve Dis. 1992 Sep;1(1):42–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ruta D. A., Garratt A. M., Leng M., Russell I. T., MacDonald L. M. A new approach to the measurement of quality of life. The Patient-Generated Index. Med Care. 1994 Nov;32(11):1109–1126. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199411000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wong-Chung D., Mateijsen N., West R., Ravell L., van Weel C. Assessing the functional status during an asthma attack with Dartmouth COOP charts. Validity with respect to the change in asthma. Fam Pract. 1991 Dec;8(4):404–408. doi: 10.1093/fampra/8.4.404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yodfat Y. Functional status in the treatment of heart failure by captopril: a multicentre, controlled, double-blind study in family practice. Fam Pract. 1991 Dec;8(4):409–411. doi: 10.1093/fampra/8.4.409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES