Skip to main content
PMC home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1996 Jul 27;313(7051):207–210. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7051.207

Home visiting by general practitioners in England and Wales.

P Aylin 1, F A Majeed 1, D G Cook 1
PMCID: PMC2351617  PMID: 8696199

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To use data from the fourth national survey of morbidity in general practice to investigate the association between home visiting rates and patients' characteristics. DESIGN--Survey of diagnostic data on all home visits by general practitioners. SETTING--60 general practices in England and Wales. SUBJECTS--502 493 patients visited at home between September 1991 and August 1992. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Home visiting rates per 1000 patient years and home visiting ratios standardised for age and sex. RESULTS--10.1% (139 801/1 378 510) of contacts with general practitioners took place in patients' homes. The average annual home visiting rate was 299/1000 patient years. Rates showed a J shaped relation with age and were lowest in people aged 16-24 years (103/1000) and highest in people aged > or = 85 years (3009/1000). 1.3% of patients were visited five or more times and received 39% of visits. Age and sex standardised home visiting ratios increased from 69 (95% confidence interval 68 to 70) in social class I to 129 (128 to 130) in social class V. The commonest diagnostic group was diseases of the respiratory system. In older age groups, diseases of the circulatory system was also a common diagnostic group. Standardised home visiting ratios for the 60 practices in the study varied nearly eightfold, from 28 to 218 (interquartile range 67 to 126). CONCLUSIONS--Home visits remain an important component of general practitioners' workload. As well as the strong associations between home visiting rates and patient characteristics, there were also large differences between practices in home visiting rates. A small number of patients received a disproportionately high number of home visits. Further investigation of patients with high home visiting rates may help to explain the large differences in workload between general practices and help in allocation of resources to practices.

Full text

PDF
207

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Balarajan R., Yuen P., Machin D. Deprivation and general practitioner workload. BMJ. 1992 Feb 29;304(6826):529–534. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6826.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beale N. Daily home visiting in one general practice: a longitudinal study of patient-initiated workload. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Jan;41(342):16–18. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fry J. Twenty-one years of general practice--changing patterns. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1972 Aug;22(121):521–528. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hallam L., Cragg D. Organisation of primary care services outside normal working hours. BMJ. 1994 Dec 17;309(6969):1621–1623. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6969.1621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hallam L. Primary medical care outside normal working hours: review of published work. BMJ. 1994 Jan 22;308(6923):249–253. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6923.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Humphreys R. C. Home visiting in a rural practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981 Jan 10;282(6258):115–116. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6258.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hurwitz B. Out of hours. BMJ. 1994 Dec 17;309(6969):1593–1594. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6969.1593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Majeed F. A., Cook D. G., Anderson H. R., Hilton S., Bunn S., Stones C. Using patient and general practice characteristics to explain variations in cervical smear uptake rates. BMJ. 1994 May 14;308(6939):1272–1276. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6939.1272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Majeed F. A., Cook D. G., Hilton S., Poloniecki J., Hagen A. Annual night visiting rates in 129 general practices in one family health services authority: association with patient and general practice characteristics. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Oct;45(399):531–535. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Marsh G. N., McNay R. A., Whewell J. Survey of home visiting by general practitioners in North-east England. Br Med J. 1972 Feb 19;1(5798):487–492. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5798.487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McKenzie K. J., Crowcroft N. S. Race, ethnicity, culture, and science. BMJ. 1994 Jul 30;309(6950):286–287. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6950.286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Morton-Jones T. J., Pringle M. A. Prescribing costs in dispensing practices. BMJ. 1993 May 8;306(6887):1244–1246. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6887.1244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Whewell J., Marsh G. N., McNay R. A. Changing patterns of home visiting in the north of England. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Apr 16;286(6373):1259–1261. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6373.1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES