Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1996 Sep 21;313(7059):721–723. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7059.721

Adequacy of cervical cytology sampling with the Cervex brush and the Aylesbury spatula: a population based randomised controlled trial.

P Dey 1, S Collins 1, M Desai 1, C Woodman 1
PMCID: PMC2352129  PMID: 8819441

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the adequacy of cervical cytology sampling with two sampling instruments commonly used in primary care-namely, the Aylesbury spatula and the Cervex brush. DESIGN: Pair matched, population based randomised controlled trial. SETTING: 86 general practices and family planning clinics in Greater Manchester. SUBJECTS: 15 882 cervical smears taken from women aged 20-64 years as part of the national cervical screening programme. INTERVENTIONS: Participating centres were allocated to sample with either the Cervex brush or the Aylesbury spatula. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Inadequate smear rate. RESULTS: 5.4% and 5.5% (433/8086 and 426/7796) of smears taken with the Cervex brush and the Aylesbury spatula respectively were reported as inadequate (odds ratio 0.95; 95% confidence interval 0.74 to 1.22). CONCLUSION: The Cervex brush offers no advantage over the Aylesbury spatula in reducing inadequate smear rates in the primary care setting.

Full text

PDF
721

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boon M. E., de Graaff Guilloud J. C., Rietveld W. J. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears. Acta Cytol. 1989 Nov-Dec;33(6):843–848. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Donner A., Klar N. Confidence interval construction for effect measures arising from cluster randomization trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Feb;46(2):123–131. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90050-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Donner A. Statistical methodology for paired cluster designs. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Nov;126(5):972–979. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Szarewski A., Curran G., Edwards R., Cuzick J., Kocjan G., Bounds W., Guillebaud J. Comparison of four cytologic sampling techniques in a large family planning center. Acta Cytol. 1993 Jul-Aug;37(4):457–460. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Szarewski A., Cuzick J., Nayagam M., Thin R. N. A comparison of four cytological sampling techniques in a genitourinary medicine clinic. Genitourin Med. 1990 Dec;66(6):439–443. doi: 10.1136/sti.66.6.439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Woodman C. B., Byrne P., Kelly K. A., Hilton C. A randomized trial of laser vaporization in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia associated with human papilloma virus infection. J Public Health Med. 1993 Dec;15(4):327–331. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES