Skip to main content

letter

. 1996 Oct 19;313(7063):1005–1006. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7063.1005c

Correcting outcome data for case mix in stroke medicine. Structure and process should be audited, rather than outcomes.

D Barer, J Ellul, C Watkins

PMCID: PMC2352292 PMID: 8892433

1005

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

Davenport R. J., Dennis M. S., Warlow C. P. Effect of correcting outcome data for case mix: an example from stroke medicine. BMJ. 1996 Jun 15;312(7045):1503–1505. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7045.1503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Mant J., Hicks N. Detecting differences in quality of care: the sensitivity of measures of process and outcome in treating acute myocardial infarction. BMJ. 1995 Sep 23;311(7008):793–796. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7008.793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Shinar D., Gross C. R., Mohr J. P., Caplan L. R., Price T. R., Wolf P. A., Hier D. B., Kase C. S., Fishman I. G., Wolf C. L. Interobserver variability in the assessment of neurologic history and examination in the Stroke Data Bank. Arch Neurol. 1985 Jun;42(6):557–565. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1985.04060060059010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

ACTIONS

RESOURCES