Skip to main content
PMC home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1996 Nov 16;313(7067):1229–1232. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7067.1229

Causality, menopause, and depression: a critical review of the literature.

L Nicol-Smith 1
PMCID: PMC2352573  PMID: 8939110

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether causal criteria can be used to find out whether there is support in published research for maintaining that menopause causes depression. DESIGN: Ninety four articles from 30 years of research examining the relation of natural menopause to depression were traced by using Medline and systematic follow up of reference lists. Specified exclusion and inclusion criteria were applied, and the resulting 43 epidemiological primary research articles were classified and tabulated according to sample and measures used and the researchers' own conclusion as to whether or not an association had been established. This material was qualitatively evaluated with Hill's nine criteria for causality. RESULT: There is insufficient evidence at present to maintain that menopause causes depression. In addition to methodological and statistical problems, a temporal problem in the menopause concept hinders research in this area. CONCLUSION: Causal criteria can usefully be used to structure a literature review. Further theoretical work is required to integrate standard clinical epidemiological concepts.

Full text

PDF
1229

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altman D. G. The scandal of poor medical research. BMJ. 1994 Jan 29;308(6924):283–284. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brambilla D. J., McKinlay S. M., Johannes C. B. Defining the perimenopause for application in epidemiologic investigations. Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Dec 15;140(12):1091–1095. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chalmers I., Dickersin K., Chalmers T. C. Getting to grips with Archie Cochrane's agenda. BMJ. 1992 Oct 3;305(6857):786–788. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6857.786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Daly E., Gray A., Barlow D., McPherson K., Roche M., Vessey M. Measuring the impact of menopausal symptoms on quality of life. BMJ. 1993 Oct 2;307(6908):836–840. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6908.836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gøtzsche P. C. Reference bias in reports of drug trials. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Sep 12;295(6599):654–656. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HILL A. B. THE ENVIRONMENT AND DISEASE: ASSOCIATION OR CAUSATION? Proc R Soc Med. 1965 May;58:295–300. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kaufert P. A. A health and social profile of the menopausal woman. Exp Gerontol. 1994 May-Aug;29(3-4):343–350. doi: 10.1016/0531-5565(94)90014-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaufert P. A., Gilbert P., Hassard T. Researching the symptoms of menopause: an exercise in methodology. Maturitas. 1988 Jul;10(2):117–131. doi: 10.1016/0378-5122(88)90156-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaufert P., Syrotuik J. Symptom reporting at the menopause. Soc Sci Med E. 1981 Aug;15(3):173–184. doi: 10.1016/0271-5384(81)90011-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kuller L. H., Meilahn E. N., Cauley J. A., Gutai J. P., Matthews K. A. Epidemiologic studies of menopause: changes in risk factors and disease. Exp Gerontol. 1994 May-Aug;29(3-4):495–509. doi: 10.1016/0531-5565(94)90030-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Matthews K. A., Kuller L. H., Wing R. R., Meilahn E. N. Biobehavioral aspects of menopause: lessons from the Healthy Women Study. Exp Gerontol. 1994 May-Aug;29(3-4):337–342. doi: 10.1016/0531-5565(94)90013-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McKinlay S. M. Issues in design, measurement, and analysis for menopause research. Exp Gerontol. 1994 May-Aug;29(3-4):479–493. doi: 10.1016/0531-5565(94)90029-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Muir Gray J. A. Two classes of creativity--improving systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Feb;48(1):4–5. doi: 10.1136/jech.48.1.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mulrow C. D. The medical review article: state of the science. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Mar;106(3):485–488. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-3-485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Oldenhave A., Jaszmann L. J., Haspels A. A., Everaerd W. T. Impact of climacteric on well-being. A survey based on 5213 women 39 to 60 years old. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Mar;168(3 Pt 1):772–780. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(12)90817-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Oxman A. D., Guyatt G. H. Guidelines for reading literature reviews. CMAJ. 1988 Apr 15;138(8):697–703. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Peterson H. B., Kleinbaum D. G. Interpreting the literature in obstetrics and gynecology: I. Key concepts in epidemiology and biostatistics. Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Oct;78(4):710–717. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Renton A. Epidemiology and causation: a realist view. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Feb;48(1):79–85. doi: 10.1136/jech.48.1.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Susser M. What is a cause and how do we know one? A grammar for pragmatic epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 1991 Apr 1;133(7):635–648. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Weed D. L. On the logic of causal inference. Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Jun;123(6):965–979. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES