Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1975 Apr;122(1):206–214. doi: 10.1128/jb.122.1.206-214.1975

Maltose chemoreceptor of Escherichia coli.

G L Hazelbauer
PMCID: PMC235659  PMID: 1091624

Abstract

Strains carrying mutations in the maltose system of Escherichia coli were assayed for maltose taxis, maltose uptake at 1 and 10 muM maltose, and maltose-binding activity released by osmotic shock. An earlier conclusion that the metabolism of maltose is not necessary for chemoreception is extended to include the functioning of maltodextrin phosphorylase, the product of malP, and the genetic control of the maltose receptor by the product of malT is confirmed. Mutants in malF and malK are defective in maltose transport at low concentrations as well as high concentrations, as previously shown, but are essentially normal in maltose taxis. The product of malE has been previously shown to be the maltose-binding protein and was implicated in maltose transport. Most malE mutants are defective in maltose taxis, and all those tested are defective in maltose transport at low concentrations. Thus, as previously suggested, the maltose-binding protein probably serves as the recognition component of the maltose receptor, as well as a component of the transport system. tsome malE mutants release maltose-binding activity and are tactic toward maltose, although defective in maltose transport, implying that the binding protein has separate sites for interaction with the chemotaxis and transport systems. Some mutations in lamB, whose product is the receptor for the bacteriophage lamba, cause defects in maltose taxis, indicating some involvement of that product in maltose reception.

Full text

PDF
206

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adler J. A method for measuring chemotaxis and use of the method to determine optimum conditions for chemotaxis by Escherichia coli. J Gen Microbiol. 1973 Jan;74(1):77–91. doi: 10.1099/00221287-74-1-77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adler J. Chemoreceptors in bacteria. Science. 1969 Dec 26;166(3913):1588–1597. doi: 10.1126/science.166.3913.1588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adler J., Epstein W. Phosphotransferase-system enzymes as chemoreceptors for certain sugars in Escherichia coli chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Jul;71(7):2895–2899. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.7.2895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Adler J., Hazelbauer G. L., Dahl M. M. Chemotaxis toward sugars in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1973 Sep;115(3):824–847. doi: 10.1128/jb.115.3.824-847.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Aksamit R., Koshland D. E., Jr A ribose binding protein of Salmonella typhimurium. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1972 Sep 26;48(6):1348–1353. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(72)90860-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Anraku Y. Transport of sugars and amino acids in bacteria. I. Purification and specificity of the galactose- and leucine-binding proteins. J Biol Chem. 1968 Jun 10;243(11):3116–3122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Armstrong J. B., Adler J., Dahl M. M. Nonchemotactic mutants of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1967 Jan;93(1):390–398. doi: 10.1128/jb.93.1.390-398.1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berg H. C., Anderson R. A. Bacteria swim by rotating their flagellar filaments. Nature. 1973 Oct 19;245(5425):380–382. doi: 10.1038/245380a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Berg H. C., Brown D. A. Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking. Nature. 1972 Oct 27;239(5374):500–504. doi: 10.1038/239500a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Berg H. C. Dynamic properties of bacterial flagellar motors. Nature. 1974 May 3;249(452):77–79. doi: 10.1038/249077a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Boos W., Gordon A. S., Hall R. E., Price H. D. Transport properties of the galactose-binding protein of Escherichia coli. Substrate-induced conformational change. J Biol Chem. 1972 Feb 10;247(3):917–924. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Boos W. Structurally defective galactose-binding protein isolated from a mutant negative in the -methylgalactoside transport system of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1972 Sep 10;247(17):5414–5424. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brown D. A., Berg H. C. Temporal stimulation of chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Apr;71(4):1388–1392. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Futrelle R. P., Berg H. C. Specification of gradients used for studies of chemotaxis. Nature. 1972 Oct 27;239(5374):517–518. doi: 10.1038/239517a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hazelbauer G. L., Adler J. Role of the galactose binding protein in chemotaxis of Escherichia coli toward galactose. Nat New Biol. 1971 Mar 24;230(12):101–104. doi: 10.1038/newbio230101a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hazelbauer G. L., Mesibov R. E., Adler J. Escherichia coli mutants defective in chemotaxis toward specific chemicals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Dec;64(4):1300–1307. doi: 10.1073/pnas.64.4.1300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hofnung M. Divergent operons and the genetic structure of the maltose B region in Escherichia coli K12. Genetics. 1974 Feb;76(2):169–184. doi: 10.1093/genetics/76.2.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hofnung M., Hatfield D., Schwartz M. malB region in Escherichia coli K-12: characterization of new mutations. J Bacteriol. 1974 Jan;117(1):40–47. doi: 10.1128/jb.117.1.40-47.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kalckar H. M. The periplasmic galactose binding protein of Escherichia coli. Science. 1971 Nov 5;174(4009):557–565. doi: 10.1126/science.174.4009.557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kellermann O., Szmelcman S. Active transport of maltose in Escherichia coli K12. Involvement of a "periplasmic" maltose binding protein. Eur J Biochem. 1974 Aug 15;47(1):139–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03677.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Larsen S. H., Reader R. W., Kort E. N., Tso W. W., Adler J. Change in direction of flagellar rotation is the basis of the chemotactic response in Escherichia coli. Nature. 1974 May 3;249(452):74–77. doi: 10.1038/249074a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Macnab R. M., Koshland D. E., Jr The gradient-sensing mechanism in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Sep;69(9):2509–2512. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.9.2509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mesibov R., Adler J. Chemotaxis toward amino acids in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1972 Oct;112(1):315–326. doi: 10.1128/jb.112.1.315-326.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mesibov R., Ordal G. W., Adler J. The range of attractant concentrations for bacterial chemotaxis and the threshold and size of response over this range. Weber law and related phenomena. J Gen Physiol. 1973 Aug;62(2):203–223. doi: 10.1085/jgp.62.2.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ordal G. W., Adler J. Isolation and complementation of mutants in galactose taxis and transport. J Bacteriol. 1974 Feb;117(2):509–516. doi: 10.1128/jb.117.2.509-516.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ordal G. W., Adler J. Properties of mutants in galactose taxis and transport. J Bacteriol. 1974 Feb;117(2):517–526. doi: 10.1128/jb.117.2.517-526.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. PARK J. T., JOHNSON M. J. A submicrodetermination of glucose. J Biol Chem. 1949 Nov;181(1):149–151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Randall-Hazelbauer L., Schwartz M. Isolation of the bacteriophage lambda receptor from Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1973 Dec;116(3):1436–1446. doi: 10.1128/jb.116.3.1436-1446.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Richarme G., Kepes A. Release of glucose from purified galactose-binding protein of Escherichia coli upon addition of galactose. Eur J Biochem. 1974 Jun 1;45(1):127–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03537.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schwartz M. Expression phénotypique et localisation génétique de mutations affectant le métabolisme du maltose chez Escherichia coli K 12. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 1967 Jun;112(6):673–698. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Silverman M., Simon M. Flagellar rotation and the mechanism of bacterial motility. Nature. 1974 May 3;249(452):73–74. doi: 10.1038/249073a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tsang N., Macnab R., Koshland D. E., Jr Common mechanism for repellents and attractants in bacterial chemotaxis. Science. 1973 Jul 6;181(4094):60–63. doi: 10.1126/science.181.4094.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES