Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1997 Oct 28;94(22):11783–11785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.22.11783

Electrophilic nitration of alkanes with nitronium hexafluorophosphate

George A Olah 1,*, Pichika Ramaiah 1, G K Surya Prakash 1
PMCID: PMC23573  PMID: 11038587

Abstract

Nitration of alkanes such as methane, ethane, propane, n-butane, isobutane, neopentane, and cyclohexane was carried out with nitronium hexafluorophosphate in methylene chloride or nitroethane solution. Nitration of methane, albeit in poor yield, required protolytic activation of the nitronium ion. The results indicate direct electrophilic insertion of NO2+ into C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 H and C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 C σ-bonds.


Aromatic electrophilic nitration is a well studied and well understood reaction (1). In contrast, aliphatic nitration is much less investigated. Beilstein and Kurbatov (2) were the first to nitrate “paraffins” from petroleum fractions with nitric acid and obtained minor amounts of nitro compounds besides overwhelming oxidation products. Konovalov (3) and Markovnikov (4) carried out a more detailed study of nitration of paraffins. Konovalov first showed the nitration of aliphatic hydrocarbon at high temperature using dilute nitric acid. Hass et al. (5) have carried out extensive studies of gas-phase nitration of propane, n-butane, isobutane, n-pentane, and isopentane with nitric acid vapor at 350–400°C under free-radical conditions. Grundmann (6) has extended this reaction for higher molecular weight hydrocarbons at 160–180°C with nitric acid and NO2. More recently, it was reported (7, 8) that gas-phase nitration of alkanes higher than methane with NO2 and O2 gives nitroalkanes. This procedure also was applied (914) for gas-phase nitration of aldehydes, ketones, alcohols, and carboxylic acids to give nitro paraffins. Umstead et al. (15) have shown the formation of 2-nitro-2-methylpropane in the laser-induced reaction of isobutane with NO2 radical. Stanley and Godbey (1618) have used the laser-induced nitration procedure for other alkanes. Nitration of ethane also has been carried out under free-radical conditions by passing H2O2 gas and NO2 (19) with ethane as the carrier gas. The mechanism of this free-radical reaction involves hydroxyl and ethyl radicals as the chain carriers. NO2–N2O4 mixture also was used (20) for the nitration of alkanes; for example, propane nitrated by NO2–N2O4 and Cl catalyst at 180–320°C gave a mixture of CH3NO2, CH3CH2NO2, Me2CHNO2, and CH3CH2CH2NO2. The amount of CH3CH2CH2NO2 obtained was higher than that of Me2CHNO2. Some nitroalkanes also have been obtained by treating alkanes with HNO3 over metal nitrates (21).

Aromatic hydrocarbons are readily nitrated with mixed acids (HNO3 + H2SO4) in high yields as the resulting aromatic nitro compounds are stable under the acidic reaction conditions. In contrast, tertiary and secondary nitroalkanes are not stable under similar acidic conditions. Even primary nitroalkanes are rapidly hydrolyzed by hot sulfuric acid whereas secondary and tertiary nitroalkanes form tars. Olah and Lin in a preliminary communication first reported (22) aliphatic electrophilic nitration using nitronium salts under mild conditions. More recently, we also have carried out nitration (23) of adamantane and diamantane using nitronium tetrafluoroborate in nitroethane solvent. Electrophilic nitration of adamantane with NO2+BF4 gave a mixture of 1-nitroadamantane and 1-adamantanol. The reaction with bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane and bicyclo[2.2.2]octane under similar conditions gave only oxidation products, bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-one and bicyclo[2.2.2]octan-1-ol (24). We now report a more detailed study showing that nitronium hexafluorophosphate with its superior solubility over terafluoroborate in solvents such as dichloromethane or nitromethane nitrates alkanes to give the corresponding nitroalkanes in useful yields without any accompanying oxidation products.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

Dichloromethane (Mallinckrodt) and nitroethane (W. R. Grace, Cambridge, MA) were dried by refluxing over calcium hydride followed by distillation. 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (Freon-113) (Aldrich) was dried over phosphorus pentoxide under dry nitrogen and then distilled. Trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (triflic acid) (3M Co.) was freshly distilled under dry nitrogen before use. Nitronium hexafluorophosphate was prepared from fuming nitric acid, anhydrous HF, HPF6 (60%), and PCl5 following a recently developed procedure (G.K.S.P., D.K. Padma, P.R., D. Adamson, and G.A.O., unpublished results). Reference nitro compounds were purchased from Aldrich. All alkanes used were commercial products. GC-MS analyses were carried out on a Hewlett-Packard 5971 (electron impact) or a Finnigan INCOS 50 Mass Spectrometer (chemical ionization). NMR spectra in CDCl3 with tetramethylsilane as the internal standard was obtained on a 200-MHz spectrometer.

General Procedure for the Nitration of Alkanes with Nitronium Hexafluorophosphate.

Nitronium hexafluorophosphate (3.82 g, 20 mmol) was added under dry nitrogen into a flame-dried 50-ml reaction flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer, condenser, nitrogen, and alkane inlet. Dry dichloromethane (20 ml) then was added, and the appropriate gaseous alkane was passed into the suspension at ambient temperature with rapid stirring. The reaction mixture was monitored by GC-MS by taking aliquot samples. Introduction of the alkane was stopped until the yield of nitroalkane did not increase further. The reaction mixture then was quenched with water and extracted with dichloromethane. The organic layer was washed successively with 5% aqueous NaHCO3 solution and water, dried over MgSO4. After evaporation of the solvent, the products were characterized by GC-MS and NMR and compared with those of authentic samples. The nitro product yields reported in Table 1 are based on the amount of NO2+PF6 used.

Table 1.

Nitration and nitrolysis of alkanes and cycloalkane with NO2+PF6 in dichloromethane or nitroethane

Hydrocarbon Time, hr Nitroalkane products Mol ratio Yield,§ %
Methane* 96/65°C CH3NO2 <3
Ethane 6 CH3NO2 > CH3CH2NO2 2.5:1 67, 33
Propane 10 CH3NO2 > CH3CH2NO2 > 2-NO2C3H7 > 1-NO2C3H7 3.5:1.3:0.7:0.15 55, 25, 16, 3.5
Isobutane 5 tert-NO2C4H9 > CH3NO2 3.1:1 84, 16
n-Butane 10 CH3NO2 > CH3CH3NO2 > 2-NO2C4H9 > 1-NO2C4H9 5.1:3.8:1.45:0.8 37, 34, 18, 11
Neopentane 10 CH3NO2 > tert-C4H9NO2 2.8:0.8 67, 33
Cyclohexane 3 C6H11NO2 30
*

Methane was nitrated with boron tris(triflate) in the presence of triflic acid. 

Cyclohexane was nitrated in nitroethane solvent. 

Product analyses carried out by GC-MS and comparison of isolated products with authentic samples. 

§

Based on GC. 

Isolated yield. 

Superacid-Activated Nitration of Methane.

A solution of boron tris (triflate) (4.58 g, 10 mmol) (26) in 20 ml of triflic acid was prepared from 9 ml, 0.103 mol boron trichloride and an excess 30 ml triflic acid in 110 ml 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane. NO2+PF6 was added to the solution, and the resulting suspension was transferred into a 200-ml stainless steel autoclave under dry nitrogen atmosphere. The autoclave was fitted with a magnetic stirrer and placed in a sand bath. The autoclave was charged with methane at a pressure of 1,500–1,600 psi. While the autoclave was kept stirring its temperature was raised to 60°C. Stirring was continued for 4 days at 60°C. After cooling and depressurization the remaining material was extracted with ether and washed with cold 5% aqueous NaHCO3 solution and water. After separation and drying the solvent was distilled off. The residue was analyzed by GC-MS, and the formation of nitromethane in an amount of ≈3% (based on the nitronium salt used) was shown.

Nitration of Cyclohexane.

Nitronium hexafluorophosphate (3.8 g, 20 mmol) was placed in a dried three-neck flask under dry nitrogen followed by addition of 10 ml of anhydrous nitrile-free nitroethane. The solution was cooled to 0°C, and 0.84 g, 10 mmol cyclohexane was introduced under rapid stirring. The reaction mixture was stirred at 0°C for 1 hr followed by room temperature for 3 hr. The mixture was poured into water and extracted with ether. The organic extract was washed with 5% aqueous sodium bicarbonate solution followed by water and dried over MgSO4. The solvent was removed by distillation under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by bulb-to-bulb distillation under vacuum to obtain 0.38 g (30%) of pure nitrocyclohexane, b.p. 108°C(bath)/(30 mm), literature (28) 106–108°C at 40 mm; 1H NMR δ 1.0–2.5 (broad multiplet, 10 H), 4.27 (sextet 1 H), 13C-NMR δ 84.61, 30.88, 24.70, 24.05; m/z 83 (M − 46, 78%).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

NO2+PF6 is much preferred over NO2+BF4 as a nitrating agent because it is substantially soluble in dichloromethane (≈4 mol%), the latter is practically insoluble in dichloromethane. In nitroethane the solubility of NO2+PF6 is more than 25 mol%. The results of nitration of various alkanes are summarized in Table 1. Methane was nitrated by treating NO2+PF6 in the presence of boron tris (triflate) (26) in triflic acid under pressure of 1,500 psi for 4 days at 65°C in an autoclave. A small amount (1≈3%) of nitromethane is formed. In the absence of superacid in either methylene chloride or nitroethane solutions no methane was detected. On the other hand, higher alkanes such as isobutane were readily nitrated with nitronium hexafluorophosphate in methylene chloride solution. Nitration takes place with ethane, propane, n-butane, and neopentane in yields up to 70%. Cyclohexane reacts with NO2+PF6 also in nitroethane to provide nitrocyclohexane in 30% isolated yield. Along with nitro products some fluoro products (due to C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 C bond cleavage) also were formed (GC-MS analysis of exit gas) (28). No oxidation byproducts were observed under the conditions used. The results indicate that tertiary C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 H bonds show highest reactivity followed by C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 C bonds, which in turn are more reactive than secondary C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 H bonds. However, with cyclohexane only nitrocyclohexane was obtained. With neopentane only C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 C bond nitrolysis products, nitromethane, and 2-methyl-2-nitropropane were observed.

The mechanism of the electrophilic aliphatic nitration is similar to that of protolytic and alkylation reactions. The reaction proceeds via two electron three-center bound carbocationic transition states formed by the insertion of the nitronium ion into C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 H (Eq. 1) and C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 C bonds (Eq. 2). It is thus a front-side SE2 reaction. Unlike reaction with adamantane and diamantane (23) the absence of oxidation byproducts indicates a straight nitronium ion insertion into C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 H and C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 C σ-bonds. Because the linear nitronium ion O=N+=O has no vacant orbital on nitrogen atom the reactions must take place via its polarization. In contrast to π-donor electron-rich aromatics, the σ-bonds of alkanes are poor electron donors and are less capable to bring about such polarization. As long as the nitronium ion remains linear it cannot act as an active nitrating agent for unreactive alkanes such as methane. Once the linear nitronium ion is partially bent, i.e., its nitrogen rehybridizes from sp to sp2, reaction can ensue. Strong acids can activate the nitronium ion by coordination of oxygen nonbonded electron pairs (superelectrophilic activation), resulting in bending (29). In the limiting case fully bent dipositive nitronium ion, NO2H2+ (Eq. 3) (or its Lewis acid-activated counterpart NO2MXn+ is formed with strong Lewis acids) and is reactive as indicated by its reaction with the C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 H bond of methane (Eq. 4). The proposed protonitronium dication (NO2H2+) (30) recently has been observed in the gas phase by electron impact mass spectrometry (31) and is invoked in the 17O NMR studies of nitronium ion in superacids (32). In the case of alkanes higher than methane additional activation by added protic acid appears unnecessary. Sufficient acid seems to be in the system (some initial moisture and acid formed during the nitration reaction) for the protolytic activation of the nitronium ion. graphic file with name pq217272701e.gif graphic file with name pq217272702e.gif graphic file with name pq217272703e.gif graphic file with name pq217272704e.gif

Tertiary nitroalkanes such as 2-nitro-2-methylpropane formed by C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 H insertion of NO2+ into isobutane are not stable to more prolonged exposure to acid. It undergoes protolytic cleavage to tert-butyl cation and derived products. No protolytic cleavage reactions were observed with the primary and secondary nitro products of methane, ethane, propane, and butane. The corresponding nitro compounds were found to be stable under the reaction conditions. This also was established by treating the authentic samples of nitromethane, nitroethane, 1- and 2-nitropropane, and nitrobutanes with nitronium hexafluorophosphate under similar conditions to those used in nitration.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Robert Aniszfeld for his help with MS (chemical ionization) analyses. Our work was supported by the Office of Naval Research (Richard Miller, program manager).

Footnotes

This is Paper No. 29 in the series “Reactions at Single Bonds.” For Paper No. 28 see ref. 25.

References

  • 1.Olah G A, Malhotra R, Narang S C. Nitration: Methods and Mechanisms. New York: VCH; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beilstein F, Kurbatov A. Chem Ber. 1880;13:1818–1821. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Konovalov M. Chem Ber. 1895;28:1852–1865. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Markovnikov W. Chem Ber. 1899;32:1441–1449. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hass H B, Dorsky J, Hodge E B. Ind Eng Chem. 1941;33:1138–1143. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Grundmann C. Die Chemie. 1943;56:159–163. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rudakov E S, Zamashchikov V V. Org React (Tartu) 1980;17:30–35. [(1981) Chem. Abstr. 95, 6138]. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rudakov E S, Belyaeva N P, Zamashchikov V V, Arzamaskova L N. Kinetic Katal. 1974;15:45–47. [(1974) Chem. Abstr. 80, 119826]. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang, S. C. P. & Sherwin, M. B. (1986) U.S. Patent 4,524,226; (1986) Chem. Abstr. 104, 131943.
  • 10.Wang, S. C. P. & Sherwin, M. B. (1985) U.S. Patent 4,517,393; (1985) Chem. Abstr. 103, 70939.
  • 11.Wang, S. C. P. & Sherwin, M. B. (1985) U.S. Patent 4,517,392; (1985) Chem. Abstr. 103, 70938.
  • 12.Wang, S. C. P. & Sherwin, M. B. (1984) U.S. Patent 4,469,904; (1983) Chem. Abstr. 101, 191126.
  • 13.Sherwin, M. B. (1985) U.S. Patent 4,476,3336; (1985) Chem. Abstr. 102, 63985.
  • 14.Sherwin, M. B. (1983) European Patent Application 85328; (1983) Chem Abstr. 99, 177852.
  • 15.Umstead M E, Lloyd S A, Fleming J W, Lin M C. Appl Phys B. 1985;38:219–224. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Stanley A E, Godbey S E U.S. Patent 4,908,110; Chem Abstr. 1990;113:117937. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Stanley, A. E. & Godbey, S. E. (1989) Gov. Rep. Announce Index (U.S.) 89, Abs. No. 9481069 [(1990) Chem. Abstr. 112, 101688].
  • 18.Stanley A E, Godbey S E. Appl Spectrosc. 1989;43:674–681. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Audley G J, Baulch D L, Campbell I M. J Chem Soc Chem Commun. 1982;18:1053–1055. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lucquin, M. & Dechaux, J. C. (1976) French Patent 2,272,975; (1976) Chem. Abstr. 85, 123328a.
  • 21.Minkov D, Dimov D, Luvchieva D. Neftekhimia. 1990;30:697–701. [(1991) Chem. Abstr. 114, 61579q]. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Olah G A, Lin H C. J Am Chem Soc. 1971;93:1259–1261. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Olah G A, Ramaiah P, Rao C B, Sandford G, Golam R, Trivedi N J, Olah J A. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:7246–7249. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Olah G A, Ramaiah P. J Org Chem. 1993;58:4639–4641. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Olah G A, Hartz N, Rasul G, Prakash G K S. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117:1336–1343. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Olah G A, Farooq O F, Farnia F M, Olah J A. J Am Chem Soc. 1988;110:2560–2565. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Emmons W D, Pagno A S. J Am Chem Soc. 1955;77:4557–4559. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tan H S, Pabst M J K, Franklin J L. Int J Mass Spectrom Ion Phys. 1976;21:297–315. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Olah G A. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1993;32:767–788. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Olah G A, Rasul G, Aniszfeld R, Prakash G K S. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114:5608–5609. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Weiske T, Koch W, Schwarz H. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:6312–6316. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Prakash G K S, Rasul G, Burrichter A, Olah G A ACS Symposium Series 623, editors. In: Nitration, Recent Laboratory and Industrial Developments. Albright L F, Carr R V, Schmitt R J, editors. Washington, DC: Am. Chem. Soc.; 1996. pp. 11–18. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES