Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1996 Oct 5;313(7061):841–844. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7061.841

Can different patient satisfaction survey methods yield consistent results? Comparison of three surveys.

G Cohen 1, J Forbes 1, M Garraway 1
PMCID: PMC2359062  PMID: 8870568

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the consistency of survey estimates of patient satisfaction with interpersonal aspects of hospital experience. DESIGN: Interview and postal surveys, evidence from three independent population surveys being compared. SETTING: Scotland and Lothian. SUBJECTS: Randomly selected members of the general adult population who had received hospital care in the past 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentages of respondents dissatisfied with aspects of patient care. RESULTS: For items covering respect for privacy, treatment with dignity, sensitivity to feelings, treatment as an individual, and clear explanation of care there was good agreement among the surveys despite differences in wording. But for items to do with being encouraged and given time to ask questions and being listened to by doctors there was substantial disagreement. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence regarding levels of patient dissatisfaction from national or local surveys should be calibrated against evidence from other surveys to improve reliability. Some important aspects of patient satisfaction seem to have been reliably estimated by surveys of all Scottish NHS users commissioned by the management executive, but certain questions may have underestimated the extent of dissatisfaction, possibly as a result of choice of wording.

Full text

PDF
841

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carr-Hill R. A. The measurement of patient satisfaction. J Public Health Med. 1992 Sep;14(3):236–249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fitzpatrick R. Surveys of patients satisfaction: I--Important general considerations. BMJ. 1991 Apr 13;302(6781):887–889. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6781.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hall J. A., Dornan M. C. What patients like about their medical care and how often they are asked: a meta-analysis of the satisfaction literature. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(9):935–939. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90284-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hopkins A., Gabbay J., Neuberger J. Role of users of health care in achieving a quality service. Qual Health Care. 1994 Dec;3(4):203–209. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.4.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Simpson M., Buckman R., Stewart M., Maguire P., Lipkin M., Novack D., Till J. Doctor-patient communication: the Toronto consensus statement. BMJ. 1991 Nov 30;303(6814):1385–1387. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6814.1385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Williams S. J., Calnan M. Convergence and divergence: assessing criteria of consumer satisfaction across general practice, dental and hospital care settings. Soc Sci Med. 1991;33(6):707–716. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90025-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES