Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
letter
. 2007 Apr 3;96(7):1127–1134. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603649

Worldwide variation in the relative importance of hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review

S A Raza 1,2, G M Clifford 2, S Franceschi 2,*
PMCID: PMC2360117  PMID: 17406349

Abstract

We combined information published worldwide on the seroprevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HbsAg) and antibodies against hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) in 27 881 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) from 90 studies. A predominance of HBsAg was found in HCCs from most Asian, African and Latin American countries, but anti-HCV predominated in Japan, Pakistan, Mongolia and Egypt. Anti-HCV was found more often than HBsAg in Europe and the United States.

Keywords: hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, hepatocellular carcinoma, meta-analysis


Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents approximately 6% of all new cancer cases diagnosed worldwide, with more than half of these occurring in China alone (Parkin et al, 2005). Relatively high incidence rates are also found in South Eastern Asia and in sub-Saharan Africa (Parkin et al, 2005). One of the least curable malignancies, HCC is the third most frequent cause of cancer death among men worldwide (Parkin et al, 2005).

Chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are the most important causes of HCC (IARC, 1994). According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), approximately 350 million people are chronically infected with HBV (WHO, 2004) and 170 million with HCV (WHO and the Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board, 1999) worldwide. There are no comparable statistics for the number of individuals coinfected with both HBV and HCV.

The relative importance of HBV and HCV infections in HCC aetiology is known to vary greatly from one part of the world to another (Parkin, 2006), and can change over time (Lu et al, 2006). In order to investigate this issue, we collated all published data on the prevalence of chronic HBV and HCV infection among HCC cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE and WHO regional indexed databases were used to search for articles published from 1 January 1989 (after HCV testing became available) to 31 October 2006, by means of the MeSH terms: ‘hepatocellular carcinoma’, ‘hepatitis B virus’ and ‘hepatitis C virus or hepacvirus’. Additional relevant studies were identified in the reference lists of selected articles. No language limitation was imposed. Eligible studies had to report prevalence of both hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibodies against HCV (anti-HCV), alone and in combination, for at least 20 HCC cases. To avoid multiple inclusions of the same HCC cases in more than one article, the time and place of recruitment of cases were cross-checked and the most recent publication was used. In the event that study methods indicated the availability of HBsAg and anti-HCV prevalence data but did not report both of them and the percent of coinfection in the article, authors were contacted for the supplementary information. In the course of contacting authors, additional data became available from one study expanded since the original publication (Appendix A).

The key information extracted from each study were study country, gender distribution, generation of HCV serology tests used, prevalence of HBsAg alone (HBsAg+) and anti-HCV alone (anti-HCV+) and in combination (HBV/HCV coinfection), and the number of cases that were seronegative for both viral markers.

Key information on 110 selected studies is given in the Appendix A by continent and country. For multicentric studies, HBsAg+ and anti-HCV+ prevalence data were separated by country (Appendix A). Study size varied substantially and four reports (one each from China, Japan, Taiwan and the United States) included more than 1000 HCC cases. With respect to anti-HCV testing, 17 studies (published from 1989 to 1994) reported the use of first-generation enzyme-linked immunoabsorbant assay (ELISA), 29 studies (published from 1992 to 2003) second-generation ELISA and 42 studies (published from 1997 to 2006) third-generation ELISA. Nineteen studies did not report the generation of HCV testing used; four of these were assumed to have used first-generation ELISA based on date of publication or patient admission. Studies known or likely to have used first-generation ELISA were not included in the computation of HCV prevalence owing to known problems of sensitivity and specificity of those assays (Booth et al, 2001). Two studies used HCV RNA instead of anti-HCV, and were included in the analysis (Appendix A).

RESULTS

After exclusion of studies using first-generation ELISA for anti-HCV testing, there were 90 studies with relevant data on the prevalence of HBsAg and anti-HCV, covering 27 881 HCC cases from 36 countries (Table 1). The majority of cases were from Asia (66%) followed by the Americas (15%), Europe (12%) and Africa (7%). In Figures 1, 2 and 3, HBsAg+ and anti-HCV+ prevalence data are shown for countries with information on at least 150 HCC cases. Otherwise countries from the same continent were combined. Substantial variations in HBsAg and anti-HCV prevalence were observed between countries and continents.

Table 1. Continent-specific distribution of studies with HCC casesa.

Continent No. of studies HCC cases Countries represented
Asia 47 18 400 China, India, Indonesia, Iran, Japan, Korea, Lebanon, Mongolia, Myanmar, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey and Vietnam
Europe 22 3469 Austria, Belgium, Germany, Greece, Italy, Sweden, Spain and UK
Americas 12 4148 United States, Brazil, Peru and Mexico
Africa 12 1864 Egypt, Gambia, Mozambique, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, South Africa, Somalia and Sudan
Total 90b 27 881  
a

Studies that used first-generation ELISA for anti-HCV detection were excluded.

b

Total does not add up to 90 owing to three multi-continent studies.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Seroprevalence and corresponding 95% confidence intervals of HBsAg, anti-HCV, both and negative in patients with HCC in Asia. *Indonesia, Myanmar, Iran, Lebanon and Saudi Arabia.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Seroprevalence and corresponding 95% confidence intervals of HBsAg, anti-HCV, both and negative in patients with HCC in Europe. *Belgium and the United Kingdom.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Seroprevalence and corresponding 95% confidence intervals of HBsAg, anti-HCV, both and negative in patients with HCC in the Americas and Africa. *Peru and Mexico; Sudan, Nigeria, Niger, Senegal and Somalia.

Asia

The largest number of HCC cases from any single country in Asia came from Taiwan, with 8595 HCC cases identified from a single multicentre study (Lu et al, 2006), Japan and China (Figure 1). The proportion of HBsAg+ HCC cases was greater than 50% in China, Taiwan, Korea, Thailand, Vietnam and Turkey. The lowest proportion of HBsAg+ HCC cases was reported in Japan where there was a strong predominance of anti-HCV seropositivity in HCC cases (68%). A higher proportion of anti-HCV+ than HBsAg+ HCC cases was also found in Pakistan (45%), and in Mongolia (40%), where HBV/HCV coinfection was also very frequent (25%). In China, anti-HCV was found twice as often in combination with HBsAg than alone. The highest proportion of HCC cases seronegative for both hepatitis viruses was found in India (37%).

Europe

The countries in Europe where the largest numbers of HCC cases were studied were Italy, Greece and Germany (Figure 2). The proportion of HBsAg+ HCC cases (56%) was higher than that of anti-HCV+ HCC in Greece, whereas the opposite was observed everywhere else in Europe. In Italy and Spain, the proportions of anti-HCV+ HCC cases were 43 and 48%, respectively. Seropositivity for anti-HCV was significantly higher than for HBsAg also in Austria and Sweden, whereas in Germany the seroprevalence of the two viruses was similar. Hepatitis B virus/HCV coinfection was rare in most European studies, whereas HCC cases seronegative for both hepatitis viruses were relatively common, measuring over 80% in Sweden.

The Americas

A majority of American studies on HCC and hepatitis viruses were conducted in the United States (Figure 3), with two-thirds of HCC cases coming from a nation-wide linkage study for the Surveillance Epidemiology and End-Results Program. In the United States, 9% of HCC cases were HBsAg+ and 22% were anti-HCV+. The prevalence of HBV/HCV coinfection in HCC cases was 3.2% and a high proportion (67%) of HCC cases were seronegative for markers of both hepatitis viruses. In Brazil, 37 and 18% of HCC cases were HBsAg+ and anti-HCV+, respectively. Only 207 additional HCC cases were available from other American countries (Peru and Mexico), where prevalence of HBsAg exceeded that of anti-HCV.

Africa

Nearly half of the data on HCC in Africa came from Egypt (Figure 3), where a very high proportion (69%) of HCC cases was anti-HCV+. All other African countries showed a preponderance of HBsAg seropositivity. HBV/HCV coinfection did not exceed 10% anywhere in Africa, whereas approximately 30% of HCC cases were seronegative for both hepatitis viruses in South Africa and Mozambique.

DISCUSSION

This review, based on nearly 30 000 HCC cases, confirms wide international variation in the relative importance of HBV and HCV in this disease. As expected, HBV infection was found substantially more often than HCV infection in HCC cases from the majority of Asian and African countries with the available data. Conversely, more HCC cases were found to be anti-HCV+ than HBsAg+ in Europe and in the United States, as was also the case in Japan, Pakistan and Mongolia, and in Asia generally. In some countries (i.e., China and Mongolia), more than 10% of HCC cases were coinfected with both hepatitis viruses, thus hampering the attribution of a fraction of HCC cases to HBV or HCV.

More than half of HCC cases were both HBsAg and anti-HCV in the United States and some North European countries, thus pointing to the relative importance of heavy alcohol consumption and, possibly, smoking, obesity and diabetes mellitus (Yuan et al, 2004) in areas where hepatitis virus prevalence and HCC incidence are low.

Our systematic review failed to identify information on HBV and HCV infection among HCC cases in Eastern Europe, Russia, Central Asia and the majority of African and Latin American countries. None of the studies we found from Oceania using second- or third-generation ELISA met our inclusion criteria. However, a record-linkage study from New South Wales, Australia showed a similar proportion of HBsAg+ (45%) and anti-HCV+ (53%) HCCs and low frequency of HBV/HCV coinfection (2%) among 281 virus-related HCC cases (Amin et al, 2006).

In addition to lack of data from many parts of the world, some weaknesses of our present review should be borne in mind. The extent to which the HCC cases we reported upon are representative, at a national level, is unclear, especially where only small studies were available. Furthermore, important secular trends may be concealed by our analysis, as in the largest study identified (Lu et al, 2006), which showed a steady increase in the proportion of HCC cases related to HCV in the last two decades in Taiwan. The vast majority of studies did not provide information on occult HBV infection. Occult HBV infection seems, however, to have little or no clinical significance, at least among immunocompetent individuals (Knoll et al, 2006). Most importantly, owing to the long latent period of HCC, seropositivity among HCC cases does not reflect the current importance of the two viruses in the relevant population but rather that two or three decades earlier.

Based upon prevalence of the infections in different populations around the world and a relative risk of 20 for both viruses, Parkin (2006) estimated the fraction of HCC attributable to HBV and HCV in 2002 to be, respectively, 23 and 20% in developed countries and 59 and 33% in developing countries. Our simpler approach, based on HCC cases only, was mainly dictated by the wish to use information from many world populations for whom information on HCC was available but not data on population prevalences of HBV and HCV. It suggests, however, that the relative contribution of HCV to the current HCC burden in middle-aged and old individuals in developed countries and in some developing countries might be higher than in Parkin (2006). In fact, seroprevalence surveys on which attributable risks are based tend to over-sample young individuals at low risk of HCV infection (e.g., blood donors and pregnant women, WHO, 1999; Madhava et al, 2002). In conclusion, our findings underline the importance of the prevention of HCV infection that, in the absence of a vaccine, will require an integrated strategy including screening of blood donations, safe injection practices and avoidance of unnecessary injections (Ahmad, 2004).

Acknowledgments

SA Raza was supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the International Agency for Research on Cancer, where the study was conceived, coordinated and analysed. We thank the authors who provided the additional data from their published studies. Expanded data from Egypt was provided through personal communication from Dr. Christopher Loffredo, Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.

Appendix A - See over

Table A1

Table A1.

      Cases
Prevalence (%)
First author Reference Country Total Male Female HBsAg+ Anti-HCV + HBsAg+ Anti-HCV+ HBsAg anti HCV
ASIA
Shi J Br J Cancer 2005; 92: 607–612 China 3126 59.6 7.4 14.1 18.9
Ding Xc Jpn J Inf Dis 2003; 56: 19–22 China 112 98 14 66.1 2.7 1.8 29.5
Wang BE J Med Virol 2002; 67: 394–400 China 92 67.4 4.3 6.5 21.7
Zhang JY Int J Epidemiol 1998; 27: 574–578 China 152 136 16 55.3 3.3 7.9 33.6
Yu SZ Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 1997; 18: 214–216 China 340 54.1 5.9 12.4 27.6
Yuan JM Int J Cancer 1995; 63: 491–493 China 76 76 0 64.5 0.0 1.3 34.2
Okuno H Cancer 1994; 73: 58–62 China 186 168 18 65.6 0.5 4.8 29.0
Tao QMa Gastroenterol Jpn 1991; 26: (Suppl 3) 156–158 China 52 38.5 9.6 28.8 23.1
Leung NWa Cancer 1992; 70: 40–44 Hong Kong 424 381 43 76.9 3.8 3.5 15.8
Joshi N Trop Gastroenterol 2003; 24: 73–75 India 40 33 7 47.5 20.0 0.0 32.5
Wang BE J Med Virol 2002; 7: 394–400 India 15 11 4 26.7 53.3 0.0 20.0
Sarin SK J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001; 16: 666–673 India 74 63 11 63.5 4.1 8.1 24.3
Ramesh R J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1992; 7: 393–395 India 53 45 8 22.6 9.4 5.7 62.3
Wang BE J Med Virol 2002; 67: 394–400 Indonesia 47 21.3 40.4 2.1 36.2
Budihusodo Ua Gastroenterol Jpn 1991; 26 (Suppl 3): 196–201 Indonesia 64 29.7 50.0 15.6 4.7
Hajiani E Saudi Med J 2005; 26: 974–977 Iran 71 45 26 52.1 8.5 0 39.4
Ding Xc Jpn J Inf Dis 2003; 56: 19–22 Japan 122 88 34 27.9 59.8 9.0 3.3
Sharp GB Int J Cancer 2003; 103: 531–537 Japan 159 37.7 24.5 8.8 28.9
Miyazawa K Intervirology 2003; 46: 150–156 Japan 250 196 54 11.6 80.4 1.2 6.8
Wang BE J Med Virol 2002; 67: 394–400 Japan 191 140 51 17.8 70.2 1.0 11.0
Tanioka H J Infect Chemother 2002; 8: 64–69 Japan 1019 709 310 16.4 72.6 0.9 10.1
Fukuhara T J Radiat Res (Tokyo) 2001; 42: 117–130 Japan 168 21.4 36.3 11.3 31.0
Koike Y Hepatology 2000; 32: 1216–1223 Japan 236 164 72 9.7 79.7 0.4 10.2
Abe K Hepatology 1998; 28: 568–572 Japan 122 89 33 18.0 61.5 4.9 15.6
Tanaka K J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88: 742–746 Japan 91 73 18 18.7 75.8 2.2 3.3
Shiratori Y Hepatology 1995; 22: 1027–1033 Japan 205 163 42 11.2 83.4 1.0 4.4
Suga M Hepatogastroenterology 1994; 41: 438–441 Japan 63 51 12 27.0 54.0 9.5 9.5
Eto H Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 1994; 25: 88–92 Japan 89 69 20 23.6 65.2 3.4 7.9
Kiyosawa Ka Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1992; 31 Japan 162 13.0 77.8 3.1 6.2
  (Suppl): S150–S156   267 225 42 30.7 59.6 1.5 8.2
      112 94 18 53.6 33.9 4.5 8.0
Yuki Na Dig Dis Sci 1992; 37: 65–72 Japan 148 126 22 17.6 61.5 8.1 12.8
Nishioka Kb Cancer 1991; 67: 429–433 Japan 180 35.6 44.4 6.1 13.9
Saito Ia Proc Natl Acad Sci 1990; 87: 6547–6549 Japan 253 207 46 19.4 53.8 0.8 26.1
Ding Xc Jpn J Inf Dis 2003; 56: 19–22 Korea 55 42 13 69.1 5.5 3.6 21.8
Kwon SY J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000; 15: 1282–1286 Korea 26 61.5 15.4 0.0 23.1
Abe K Hepatology 1998; 28: 568–572 Korea 55 42 13 81.8 5.5 3.6 9.1
Shin HR Int J Epidemiol 1996; 25: 933–940 Korea 170 65.3 10.0 1.2 23.5
Park BC J Viral Hepat 1995; 2: 195–202 Korea 540 431 109 58.1 11.3 3.0 27.6
Pyong SJa Jpn J Cancer Res 1994; 85: 674–679 Korea 90 68 22 15.6 73.3 1.1 10.0
Yaghi C World J Gastroenterol 2006; 2: 3575–3580 Lebanon 92 78 14 64.1 16.3 3.3 16.3
Tsatsralt-Od Bc J Med Virol 2005; 77: 491–499 Mongolia 76 46 30 17.1 14.5 68.4 0
Shizuma T Kansenshogaku Zasshi 2005; 79: 824–825 Mongolia 90 34.4 48.9 5.6 11.1
Oyunsuren T Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2006; 7: 460–462 Mongolia 197 110 87 30.3 39.7 25.1 5.0
Nakai K J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39: 1536–1539 Myanmar 25 56.0 24.0 12.0 8.0
Hamza H Proc World Congress of Epidemiology 2005 Pakistan 57 40 17 21.1 43.9 7.0 28.1
Khokhar N J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2003; 15: 1–4 Pakistan 57 45 12 15.8 47.4 3.5 33.3
Sharieff S Trop Doct 2001; 31: 224–225 Pakistan 201 149 52 35.8 41.3 7.0 15.9
Mumtaz MS J Rawal Med Coll 2001; 5: 78–80 Pakistan 44 25.0 54.5 6.8 13.6
Kausar S Pak J Gastroenterol 1998; 12: 1–2 Pakistan 30 16.7 73.3 6.7 3.3
Butt AK J Pak Med Assoc 1998; 48: 197–201 Pakistan 76 65 11 10.5 75.0 10.5 3.9
Abdul Mujeeb S Trop Doct 1997; 27: 45–46 Pakistan 54 42.6 9.3 24.1 24.1
Tong CY Epidemiol Infect 1996; 117: 327–332 Pakistan 23 22 1 78.3 4.3 4.3 13.0
Ayoola EA J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 19: 665–669 Saudi Arabia 118 96 22 63.6 8.5 3.4 24.6
Al Karawi MAa J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1992; 7: 237–239 Saudi Arabia 42 38 4 33.3 26.2 4.8 35.7
Khan LA Saudi Med J 2001; 22: 641–642 Saudi Arabia 24 23 1 20.8 25.0 4.2 50.0
Ozer B Turk J Gastroenterol 2003; 14: 85–90 Turkey 35 28 7 65.7 28.6 2.9 2.9
Uzunalimoglu O Dig Dis Sci 2001; 46: 1022–1028 Turkey 207 163 44 52.2 19.3 3.9 24.6
Lu SN Int J Cancer 2006; 119: 1946–1952 Taiwan 8595 6741 1854 53.2 27.9 8.3 10.7
Tangkijvanich P J Gastroenterol 1999; 34: 227–233 Thailand 86 69 17 58.1 10.5 8.1 23.3
Tangkijvanich P J Gastroenterol 2003; 38: 142–148 Thailand 101 86 15 56.4 5.0 8.9 29.7
Songsivilai S Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1996; 90: 505–507 Thailand 80 60.0 10.0 3.8 26.2
Ding Xc Jpn J Inf Dis 2003; 56: 19–22 Vietnam 38 30 8 60.5 2.6 0 36.8
Cordier S Int J Cancer 1993; 55: 196–201 Vietnam 149 149 0 92.6 2.0 0 5.4
Continent subtotal     20194     48.1 29.2 7.9 14.8
                   
EUROPE
Schoniger-Hekele M Gut 2001; 48: 103–109 Austria 245 187 58 9.8 36.7 1.6 51.8
Van Roey G Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000; 12: 61–66 Belgium 124 21.0 23.4 16.9 38.7
Nalpas Bb J Hepatol 1991; 12: 70–74 France 47 6.4 42.6 19.1 31.9
Erhardt A Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2002; 127: 2665–2668 Germany 192 21.4 34.9 4.7 39.1
Rabe C World J Gastroenterol 2001; 7: 208–215 Germany 85 64 21 29.4 24.7 7.1 38.8
Hellerbrand C Dig Dis 2001; 19: 345–51 Germany 118 94 24 7.6 19.5 0.0 72.9
Kubicka S Liver 2000; 20: 312–318 Germany 268 214 54 25.0 16.8 10.1 48.1
Petry W Z Gastroenterol 1997; 35: 1059–1067 Germany 55 20.0 52.7 0.0 27.3
Goeser T Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1994; 3: 311–315 Germany 81 66 15 27.2 24.7 1.2 46.9
Raptis I J Viral Hepat 2003; 10: 450–454 Greece 306 265 41 52.3 21.9 0.7 25.2
Kuper HE Cancer Causes Control 2000; 11: 171–175 Greece 333 283 50 59.5 12.3 3.3 24.9
Hadziyannis S Int J Cancer 1995; 60: 627–631 Greece 65 49 16 56.9 7.7 4.6 30.8
Kaklamani Ea JAMA 1991; 265:1974–1976 Greece 185 166 19 22.7 15.7 23.2 38.4
Franceschi S Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15: 683–689 Italy 229 183 46 10.0 61.1 3.9 24.9
Donato F Oncogene 2006; 25: 3756–3770 Italy 583 19.7 37.9 2.7 39.6
Ricci G Cancer Lett 1995; 98: 121–125 Italy 104 31.7 20.2 34.6 13.5
Stroffolini T J Hepatol 1992; 16: 360–363 Italy 65 47 18 16.9 58.5 7.7 16.9
Simonetti RGa Ann Intern Med 1992; 116: 97–102 Italy 212 161 51 7.1 62.7 8.5 21.7
Levrero Mb J Hepatol 1991; 12: 60–63 Italy 167 135 32 22.8 49.1 9.0 19.2
Colombo Ma Lancet 1989; 2: 1006–1008 Italy 132 115 17 14.4 48.5 16.7 20.5
Ladero JM Eur J Cancer 2006; 42: 73–77 Spain 184 150 34 4.9 63.0 1.6 30.4
Rodriguez Vidigal FF An Med Interna 2005; 22: 162–166 Spain 42 37 5 11.9 42.9 0.0 45.2
Ding Xc Jpn J Inf Dis 2003; 56: 19–22 Spain 57 45 12 38.6 12.3 3.5 45.6
Crespo J Med Clin (Barc) 1996; 106: 241–245 Spain 94 82 12 18.1 43.6 10.6 27.7
Bruix Ja Lancet 1989; 2: 1004–1006 Spain 96 67 29 4.2 69.8 5.2 20.8
Widell A Scand J Infect Dis 2000; 32: 147–152 Sweden 95 5.3 16.8 0 77.9
Kaczynski J Scand J Gastroenterol 1996; 31: 809–813 Sweden 64 48 16 0 10.9 0 89.1
Haydon GH Gut 1997; 40: 128–132 United Kingdom 80 16.3 27.5 2.5 53.8
Continent subtotal     4308     23.1 34.3 6.5 36.1
                   
AFRICA
Ezzat Sd Int J Hyg Environ Health 2005; 208: 329–339 Egypt 450 3.8 82.0 5.3 8.9
Abdel–Wahab M Hepatogastroenterology 2000; 47: 663–668 Egypt 385 14.5 61.0 7.0 17.4
Hassan MM J Clin Gastroenterol 2001; 33: 123–126 Egypt 33 23 10 12.1 72.7 3.0 12.1
Darwish MA J Egypt Public Health Assoc 1993; 68: 1–9 Egypt 70 57 13 21.4 30.0 40.0 8.6
Kirk GD Hepatology 2004; 39: 211–219 Gambia 186 59.1 15.1 3.8 22.0
Dazza MC Am J Trop Med Hyg 1993; 48: 237–242 Mozambique 178 141 37 64.6 4.5 1.7 29.2
Cenac A Am J Trop Med Hyg 1995; 52: 293–296 Niger 26 19 7 57.7 7.7 15.4 19.2
Olbuyide IO Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1997; 91: 38–41 Nigeria 64 42 22 48.4 7.8 10.9 32.8
Kew MC Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 184–187 South Africa 231 201 30 44.6 16.9 8.7 29.9
Ka MM Dakar Med 1996; Spec No: 59–62 Senegal 64 56 8 34.4 64.1 1.6 0
Bile K Scand J Infect Dis 1993; 25: 559–564 Somalia 62 53 9 37.1 35.5 4.8 22.6
Omer RE Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2001; 95: 487–491 Sudan 115 88 27 41.7 10.4 0.9 47.0
Continent subtotal     1864     30.0 43.2 6.8 20.0
                   
NORTH AMERICA
Marrero JA J Hepatol 2005; 42: 218–224 United States 70 44 26 7.1 51.4 0.0 41.4
Davila JA Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 1372–1380 United States 2584 1721 863 5.8 13.3 2.9 77.9
Ding Xc Jpn J Inf Dis 2003; 56: 19–22 United States 65 41 24 15.4 41.5 3.1 40.0
Hassan MM Hepatology 2002; 36: 1206–1213 United States 115 87 28 11.3 19.1 3.5 66.1
Abe K Hepatology 1998; 28: 568–572 United States 65 40 25 10.8 41.5 1.5 46.2
Yu MC Hepatology 1997; 25: 226–228 United States 111 67 44 7.2 31.5 1.8 59.5
Nomura A J Infect Dis 1996; 173: 1474–1476 United States 24 24 0 62.5 0.0 0.0 37.5
Di Bisceglie Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 2060–2063 United States 691 15.5 46.6 4.8 33.1
Di Biscegliea Am J Gastroenterol 1991; 86: 335–338 United States 99 67 32 6.1 12.1 1.0 80.8
Hasan Fa Hepatology 1990, 12: 589–591 United States 87 27.6 35.6 4.6 32.2
Continent subtotal     3911     8.8 21.9 3.1 66.1
                   
LATIN AMERICA
Miranda EC Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2004; 37 (Suppl 2): 47–51 Brazil 36 31 5 58.3 0.0 8.3 33.3
Goncalves CS Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 1997; 39: 165–170 Brazil 180 139 41 32.8 21.1 3.9 42.2
Mondragon Sanchez R Hepatogastroenterology 2005; 52: 1159–1162 Mexico 71 8.5 60.6 14.1 16.9
Ruiz E Rev Gastroenterol Peru 1998; 18: 199–212 Peru 136 116 20 63.2 0.7 0.0 36.0
Continent subtotal     423     40.7 19.4 4.7 35.2
                   
OCEANA
Yip Db World J Gastroenterol 1999; 5: 483–487 Australia 63 43 20 28.6 3.2 4.8 63.5
Total     30763     38.3 29.7 7.0 25.0
a

Studies reporting first generation ELISA.

b

Studies presumed to have used first-generation ELISA.

c

Studies reporting only HCV RNA testing.

d

Data has been expanded since original publication.

References

  1. Ahmad K (2004) Pakistan: a cirrhotic state? Lancet 364: 1843–1844 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amin J, Dore GJ, O'Connell DL, Bartlett M, Tracey E, Kaldor JM, Law MG (2006) Cancer incidence in people with hepatitis B or C infection: a large community-based linkage study. J Hepatol 45: 197–203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Booth JC, O'Grady J, Neuberger J (2001) Clinical guidelines on the management of hepatitis C. Gut 49(Suppl 1): I1–21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. IARC (1994) Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans Volume 59: Hepatitis Viruses. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer [Google Scholar]
  5. Knoll A, Hartmann A, Hamoshi H, Weislmaier K, Jilg W (2006) Serological pattern ‘anti-HBc alone’: characterization of 552 individuals and clinical significance. World J Gastroenterol 12: 1255–1260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lu SN, Su WW, Yang SS, Chang TT, Cheng KS, Wu JC, Lin HH, Wu SS, Lee CM, Changchien CS, Chen CJ, Sheu JC, Chen DS, Chen CH (2006) Secular trends and geographic variations of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan. Int J Cancer 119: 1946–1952 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Madhava V, Burgess C, Drucker E (2002) Epidemiology of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet Infect Dis 2: 293–302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Parkin DM (2006) The global health burden of infection-associated cancers in the year 2002. Int J Cancer 118: 3030–3044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55: 74–108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. WHO and the Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board (1999) Global surveillance and control of hepatitis C. Report of a WHO Consultation organized in collaboration with the Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board, Antwerp, Belgium. J Viral Hepat 6: 35–47 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. World Health Organisation (1999) Hepatitis C-global prevalence (update). Wkly Epidemiol Rec 49: 425–427 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. World Health Organisation (2004) Hepatitis B vaccines. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 79: 26315344667 [Google Scholar]
  13. Yuan JM, Govindarajan S, Arakawa K, Yu MC (2004) Synergism of alcohol, diabetes, and viral hepatitis on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in blacks and whites in the US. Cancer 101: 1009–1017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES