Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
letter
. 2006 Apr 25;94(10):1548. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603112

Ras oncogene mutations and survival in patients with lung cancer

G Ferretti 1,*, A Felici 1, F Cognetti 1
PMCID: PMC2361273  PMID: 16641907

Sir,

The proto-oncogene ras is mutated in 20% of lung cancer (Mascaux et al, 2005). Among 36 patients with primary operable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we detected seven (19.4%) with K-ras exon I mutations on tumour samples (Ferretti et al, 2000). However, the prognostic significance of ras for survival in this disease remains controversial.

Aggregating data obtained by univariate analysis in retrospective trials, ras gene alteration appears to be a poor prognostic factor for survival in NSCLC (Mascaux et al, 2005). The authors concluded that ras appears to be a pejorative prognostic factor in terms of survival in NSCLC globally, in adenocarcinomas and when it is studied by polymerase chain reaction. In 44 patients with stage III NSCLC undergoing tumour resection after neoadjuvant treatment, the presence of a ras mutation, which was found independently of gender, age, tumour stage and clinical response status, was a significant predictor for a poor progression-free survival even after complete resection (Broermann et al, 2002). Patients with K-ras mutant NSCLC showed poorer clinical outcomes when treated with erlotinib and chemotherapy (Eberhard et al, 2005). Furthermore, in NSCLCs with ras mutation, the overexpression of Skp2, a protein that plays a critical role in cell cycle progression, was a significant independent poor prognostic marker of survival (Zhu et al, 2004).

By contrast, in the adjuvant setting, among 227 patients with surgically resected NSCLC, the K-ras mutations (codons 1–31) were not predictive markers of a shorter survival (Moldvay et al, 2000). Other authors had previously shown only a trend toward improved survival for patients with wild-type ras compared with those with mutant ras who were randomised to receive adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy or radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy (Schiller et al, 2001). At the multivariate analysis, a trend bordering on statistical significance for K-ras was registered as well. However, according to Winton et al (2005), in patients with completely resected stage IB–II NSCLC, adjuvant chemotherapy did not confer a survival advantage in those whose tumours had ras mutations, whereas it did in patients with wild-type ras. It must be highlighted that in this study the interaction analysis showed that the effect of ras mutations on the treatment outcome was not statistically significant.

Thus, in order to stratify variables for future treatment approaches, the prognostic and predictive impact of ras mutation status still needs to be confirmed in prospective trials with appropriate multivariate analysis.

References

  1. Broermann P, Junker K, Brandt BH, Heinecke A, Freitag L, Klinke F, Berdel WE, Thomas M (2002) Trimodality treatment in stage III nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: prognostic impact of K-ras mutations after neoadjuvant therapy. Cancer 94: 2055–2062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Eberhard DA, Johnson BE, Amler LC, Goddard AD, Heldens SL, Herbst RS, Ince WL, Janne PA, Januario T, Johnson DH, Klein P, Miller VA, Ostland MA, Ramies DA, Sebisanovic D, Stinson JA, Zhang YR, Seshagiri S, Hillan KJ (2005) Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor and in KRAS are predictive and prognostic indicators in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy alone and in combination with erlotinib. J Clin Oncol 23: 5900–5909 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ferretti G, Curigliano G, Pastorino U, Cittadini A, Flamini G, Calabro MG, De Pas T, Orlando L, Mandala M, Colleoni M, Spaggiari L, Granone PL, Pagliari G, de Braud F, Fazio N, Goldhirsch A (2000) Detection by denaturant gradient gel electrophoresis of tumor-specific mutations in biopsies and relative bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 6: 2393–2400 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mascaux C, Iannino N, Martin B, Paesmans M, Berghmans T, Dusart M, Haller A, Lothaire P, Meert AP, Noel S, Lafitte JJ, Sculier JP (2005) The role of RAS oncogene in survival of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 92: 131–139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Moldvay J, Scheid P, Wild P, Siat J, Borrelly J, Marie B (2000) Predictive survival markers in patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 6: 1125–1134 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Schiller JH, Adak S, Feins RH, Keller SM, Fry WA, Livingston RB, Hammond ME, Wolf B, Sabatini L, Jett J, Kohman L, Johnson DH (2001) Lack of prognostic significance of p53 and K-ras mutations in primary resected non-small-cell lung cancer on E4592: a Laboratory Ancillary Study on an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Prospective Randomized Trial of Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy. J Clin Oncol 19: 448–457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Winton T, Livingston R, Johnson D, Rigas J, Johnston M, Butts C, Cormier Y, Goss G, Inculet R, Vallieres E, Fry W, Bethune D, Ayoub J, Ding K, Seymour L, Graham B, Tsao MS, Gandara D, Kesler K, Demmy T, Shepherd F (2005) Vinorelbine plus cisplatin vs observation in resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 352: 2589–2597 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhu CQ, Blackhall FH, Pintilie M, Iyengar P, Liu N, Ho J, Chomiak T, Lau D, Winton T, Shepherd FA, Tsao MS (2004) Skp2 gene copy number aberrations are common in non-small cell lung carcinoma, and its overexpression in tumors with ras mutation is a poor prognostic marker. Clin Cancer Res 10: 1984–1991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES