Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 2008 Mar 25;98(8):1434–1436. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604314

CASP8 variants D302H and −652 6N ins/del do not influence the risk of colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom population

A M Pittman 1,3, P Broderick 1,3, K Sullivan 1, S Fielding 1, E Webb 1, S Penegar 1, I Tomlinson 2, R S Houlston 1,*
PMCID: PMC2361709  PMID: 18362937

Abstract

Polymorphisms in CASP8 at 2q33.1 have been associated with the risk of developing cancer, specifically, the D302H variant (rs1045485) with breast cancer in the European population and the −652 6N ins/del promoter variant (rs3834129) with multiple tumours including colorectal cancer (CRC) in the Chinese population. We evaluated the relationship between −652 6N ins/del and D302H variants and risk of developing CRC in the UK population by genotyping 4016 cases and 3749 controls. Both variants showed no evidence of an association with risk of developing CRC (P=0.42 and 0.22, respectively). In contrast, the recently identified CRC susceptibility allele rs6983267 mapping to 8q24 was significantly associated with disease risk (P=8.94 × 10−8). It is thus very unlikely that variation in CASP8 defined by −652 6N ins/del or D302H influences the risk of CRC in European populations. The implications of our findings both in terms of population-specific effects and publication bias are discussed.

Keywords: CASP8 , colorectal cancer, risk, polymorphism


Although inherited susceptibility is responsible for ∼30% of all colorectal cancers (CRCs) (Lichtenstein et al, 2000), high-penetrance, germline mutations in APC, the mismatch repair (MMR) genes, MUTYH/MYH, SMAD4, ALK3 and STK11/LKB1 account for <5% of cases (Aaltonen et al, 2007). Much of the remaining variation in genetic risk is likely to be explained by combinations of more common, lower-penetrance variants.

Although such common alleles may only confer modest differences in CRC risk through interaction with other common alleles, some individuals will be placed at a significant risk. Hence, screening for a battery of such markers potentially has clinical utility. It is, however, clear that robust validation of novel CRC predisposition loci is required to avoid spurious testing.

The availability of high-resolution linkage disequilibrium (LD) maps, and consequently of sets of tagging SNPs that capture much of the common sequence variation, allows whole-genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for disease associations to be efficiently conducted. This approach is attractive as it is unbiased and does not depend upon prior knowledge of function or presumptive involvement of any gene in disease causation. Furthermore, it minimises the possibility of failing to identify important variants in hitherto unstudied genes. Recent GWAS have vindicated the assertion of the ‘common-disease common-variant’ hypothesis providing evidence for common disease variants for CRC mapping to 8q24 (Haiman et al, 2007; Tomlinson et al, 2007; Zanke et al, 2007) and SMAD7 (Broderick et al, 2007). The applicability of the GWA strategy, however, depends heavily on the robustness of tagging, and for many regions of the genome this may not be optimal. This is a potentially serious limitation for regions of the genome to which strong candidate genes map and are not properly tagged.

Caspase 8 (CASP8; MIM 601763) is a key regulator of apoptosis or programmed cell death, an essential defense mechanism against hyperproliferation and malignancy. Polymorphic variation in CASP8 has been reported to influence cancer risk. The variant D302H (rs1045485) has been associated with risk of breast cancer in the European population (Cox et al, 2007). Furthermore, the −652 6N ins/del promoter variant (rs3834129) has been associated with the risk of developing multiple tumour types, including CRC in the Chinese population (Sun et al, 2007). It has been asserted that this specific variant has direct functional effects on cancer risk on the basis that the deletion destroys a stimulatory protein 1 binding site and decreases CASP8 transcription (Sun et al, 2007). Moreover, biochemical analyses have shown that T lymphocytes with the deletion variant have a reduced caspase-8 activity and activation-induced cell death upon stimulation with cancer cell antigens (Sun et al, 2007).

To confirm or refute the purported association between −652 6N ins/del and CRC risk and evaluate the relationship between D302H and CRC risk, we genotyped 4016 cases and 3749 controls ascertained from the UK population. Risk estimates were compared with those associated with the 8q24 risk allele rs6983267 using previously generated data (Tomlinson et al, 2007).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects

Cases (1930 males, 2086 females; mean age at diagnosis 59.5 years; s.d.±8.7) were ascertained through the National Study of Colorectal Cancer Genetics (NSCCG) (Penegar et al, 2007). Healthy control individuals (2092 males, 1657 females; mean age 60 years; s.d.±10.8) were recruited from NSCCG (n=1843), the Genetic Lung Cancer Predisposition Study (1999–2004; n=479) and the Royal Marsden Hospital Trust/Institute of Cancer Research Family History and DNA Registry (1999–2004; n=1427) (Tomlinson et al, 2007). Cases and controls were British Caucasians, and there were no obvious differences in the demography of cases and controls in terms of place of residence within the UK. The study was conducted with ethics committee approval (MREC/98/2/67; MREC02/0/97) in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Genotyping

DNA was extracted from samples using conventional methodologies and quantified using PicoGreen (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA, USA). Genotyping of D302H (rs1045485) and −652 6N ins/del (rs3834129) was conducted by competitive allele-specific PCR KASPar chemistry (KBiosciences Ltd, Hertfordshire, UK). For rs1045485, allele-specific primers were: GAAGGTGACCAAGTTCATGCTAGATTTGCTCTACTGTGCAGTCATC and GAAGGTCGGAGTCAACGGATTAGATTTGCTCTACTGTGCAGTCATG; common primer: GACCACGACCTTTGAAGAGCTTCAT. For rs3834129, allele-specific primers were: GAAGGTCGGAGTCAACGGATTGCCATAGYAATTCTTGCTCTGCCAA and GAAGGTGACCAAGTTCATGCTGCCATAGYAATTCTTGCTCTGCCAC; common primer: CACTGAGACGTTAAGTAACTTGCCCAA. Genotyping quality control was tested using duplicate DNA samples within studies and SNP assays, together with direct sequencing of subsets of samples to confirm genotyping accuracy. For both SNPs, 99.6% concordant results were obtained.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were undertaken using STATA Software (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA). To test for population stratification, the distribution of genotypes in controls was tested for a departure from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Power calculations were undertaken on the basis of proportions. In all analyses, P-value of 0.05 was considered significant. Linkage disequilibrium between genotypes was enumerated using the metric R2. This was estimated using Haploview software.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

D302H (rs1045485) and −652 6N ins/del (rs3834129) genotypes were obtained for 96% (3843) and 97% (3879) of CRC cases and 97% (3631) and 98% (3661) of controls, respectively; hence, there was no evidence of any systematic bias in genotyping. Furthermore, there was no evidence of population stratification, as the genotype distribution in controls for both variants satisfied HWE (Table 1). The frequency of the 302H allele (0.132) in our study was similar to that reported in a other European populations (0.130 (Cox et al, 2007) and 0.125 CEPH (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/)). In the Chinese population, this SNP has, however, been documented to be nomomorphic. The frequency of −652 6N del allele in controls was 0.501, again similar to previously published data on Europeans. It is, however, markedly different to that observed in the Chinese population in which the frequency is ∼25%.

Table 1. Association between CASP8 variants D302H (rs1045485) and the ±6N promoter variant rs3834129 with colorectal cancer and results are also shown for the 8q24.21 variant rs6983267.

Gene/locus Variant Genotype Cases (%) Controls (%) OR (95% CI)
CASP8 D302H (rs1045485) CC 2890 (75%) 2703 (74%) 1.00 (ref)
    CG 894 (23%) 867 (24%) 1.09 (0.75–1.58)
    GG 59 (2%) 61 (2%) 1.13 (0.78–1.63)
    CG/GG 953 (25%) 928 (26%) 0.96 (0.86–1.07)
          Ptrend=0.67
           
CASP8 −/CTTACT (rs3834129)       Ptrend=0.97
    6N ins/ins 995 (26%) 892 (24%) 1.00
    6N del/ins 1897 (49%) 1872 (51%) 0.91 (0.81–1.01)
    6N del/del 987 (25%) 897 (25%) 0.99 (0.87–1.12)
    6Ndel/del +6N del/ins 2884 (74%) 2769 (76%) 0.93 (0.84–1.04)
          Ptrend=0.83
           
8q24.21 rs6983267 GG 1102 (31%) 678 (26%) 1.00 (ref)
    GT 1824 (51%) 1297 (50%) 0.86 (0.76–0.97)
    TT 657 (18%) 604 (23%) 0.67 (0.57–0.77)
    GT/TT 2481 (69%) 1901 (73%) 0.80 (0.72–0.90)
          Ptrend=1.13 × 10−6

Test of HWE: rs3834129, P=0.09; rs1045485, P=0.37; rs6983267, P=0.74. Crude odds ratios are presented. Ptrend, test of trend across genotypes. Adjustment for age and sex made no difference to metrics (data not shown).

The frequencies of both variants were not significantly different in cases and controls (allele test of significance, P=0.423 and 0.216 respectively; Table 1). There was not strong LD between rs3834129 and rs1045485 (r2=0.19). By comparison, the 8q24 variant rs6983267 displayed a strong association with CRC risk (P=8.94 × 10−8).

Based on the number of cases and controls analyzed and the population frequencies of the rare alleles of each polymorphism, our study has ∼90% power to demonstrate an OR of 1.2 associated with each variant stipulating a P-value of 0.05. Hence, while the D302H polymorphism has been robustly shown to influence breast cancer risk (Frank et al, 2006), our study indicates that the variant is unlikely to affect risk of CRC and hence its effect on cancer risks is not generic. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude the possibility that each variant is associated with more modest risks of CRC (i.e. <1.2, based upon the upper 95% CI for ORs).

The −652 6N ins/del variant has been reported to influence both breast and CRC in the Chinese population. A recent study of breast cancer with the Europeans has failed to confirm an association with breast cancer risk (Frank et al, 2007).

In our study, genotyping was conducted by allele-specific PCR, generally acknowledged to provide a robust means of assigning genotypes. In contrast, Sun et al, used PCR-RFLP to determine genotypes, which through incomplete digestion of PCR product can lead to misassignment of alleles. This can lead to systematic basis, especially if cases and controls are not genotyped simultaneously. Although we cannot entirely exclude the possibility of such random measurement error as the basis of non-replication of study findings, it seems unlikely to be a major issue.

While there is evidence that difference in genetic frequencies across populations of different racial origin is not generally accompanied by differences in population-specific genetic effects (Ioannidis et al, 2004), we cannot exclude this possibility.

On the basis of in vitro functional assays, it was asserted that this variant has direct impact of cancer risk via apoptosis. Allele frequencies are, however, very different between populations and the possibility of differential LD in the different populations remains a basis for non-replication. Alternatively, as the study purporting that −652 6N ins/del influences CRC was based on a relatively small sample size to that advocated for GWA analyses, there remains the distinct possibility of a type 1 error coupled with publication bias. If additional studies of these variants are conducted, it opens up the possibility of using meta-analysis to provide the final step in confirming or refuting an association with cancer risk.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all the patients and individuals for their participation. The study was supported by grants from Cancer Research UK. PB was funded by a grant from Leukaemia research.

Footnotes

Web addresses

Illumina: http://www.illumina.com/

HAPMAP: http://www.hapmap.org/

Haploview: http://www.broad.mit.edu/mpg/haploview/

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Aaltonen L, Johns L, Jarvinen H, Mecklin JP, Houlston R (2007) Explaining the familial colorectal cancer risk associated with mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient and MMR-stable tumors. Clin Cancer Res 13: 356–361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Broderick P, Carvajal-Carmona L, Pittman AM, Webb E, Howarth K, Rowan A, Lubbe S, Spain S, Sullivan K, Fielding S, Jaeger E, Vijayakrishnan J, Kemp Z, Gorman M, Chandler I, Papaemmanuil E, Penegar S, Wood W, Sellick G, Qureshi M, Teixeira A, Domingo E, Barclay E, Martin L, Sieber O, Kerr D, Gray R, Peto J, Cazier JB, Tomlinson I, Houlston RS (2007) A genome-wide association study shows that common alleles of SMAD7 influence colorectal cancer risk. Nat Genet 39: 1315–1317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cox A, Dunning AM, Garcia-Closas M, Balasubramanian S, Reed MW, Pooley KA, Scollen S, Baynes C, Ponder BA, Chanock S, Lissowska J, Brinton L, Peplonska B, Southey MC, Hopper JL, McCredie MR, Giles GG, Fletcher O, Johnson N, dos Santos Silva I, Gibson L, Bojesen SE, Nordestgaard BG, Axelsson CK, Torres D, Hamann U, Justenhoven C, Brauch H, Chang-Claude J, Kropp S, Risch A, Wang-Gohrke S, Schurmann P, Bogdanova N, Dork T, Fagerholm R, Aaltonen K, Blomqvist C, Nevanlinna H, Seal S, Renwick A, Stratton MR, Rahman N, Sangrajrang S, Hughes D, Odefrey F, Brennan P, Spurdle AB, Chenevix-Trench G, Beesley J, Mannermaa A, Hartikainen J, Kataja V, Kosma VM, Couch FJ, Olson JE, Goode EL, Broeks A, Schmidt MK, Hogervorst FB, Van’t Veer LJ, Kang D, Yoo KY, Noh DY, Ahn SH, Wedren S, Hall P, Low YL, Liu J, Milne RL, Ribas G, Gonzalez-Neira A, Benitez J, Sigurdson AJ, Stredrick DL, Alexander BH, Struewing JP, Pharoah PD, Easton DF (2007) A common coding variant in CASP8 is associated with breast cancer risk. Nat Genet 39: 352–358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Frank B, Hemminki K, Wappenschmidt B, Meindl A, Klaes R, Schmutzler RK, Bugert P, Untch M, Bartram CR, Burwinkel B (2006) Association of the CASP10 V410I variant with reduced familial breast cancer risk and interaction with the CASP8 D302H variant. Carcinogenesis 27: 606–609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Frank B, Rigas SH, Bermejo JL, Wiestler M, Wagner K, Hemminki K, Reed MW, Sutter C, Wappenschmidt B, Balasubramanian SP, Meindl A, Kiechle M, Bugert P, Schmutzler RK, Bartram CR, Justenhoven C, Ko YD, Bruning T, Brauch H, Hamann U, Pharoah PP, Dunning AM, Pooley KA, Easton DF, Cox A, Burwinkel B (2007) The CASP8 −652 6N del promoter polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a multicenter study. Breast Cancer Res Treat; e-pub ahead of print. doi:10.1007/S10549.007.9752z [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Haiman CA, Le Marchand L, Yamamato J, Stram DO, Sheng X, Kolonel LN, Wu AH, Reich D, Henderson BE (2007) A common genetic risk factor for colorectal and prostate cancer. Nat Genet 39: 954–956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ioannidis JP, Ntzani EE, Trikalinos TA (2004) ‘Racial’ differences in genetic effects for complex diseases. Nat Genet 36: 1312–1318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK, Iliadou A, Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M, Pukkala E, Skytthe A, Hemminki K (2000) Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer – analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N Engl J Med 343: 78–85 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Penegar S, Wood W, Lubbe S, Chandler I, Broderick P, Papaemmanuil E, Sellick G, Gray R, Peto J, Houlston R (2007) National study of colorectal cancer genetics. Br J Cancer 97(9): 1305–1309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sun T, Gao Y, Tan W, Ma S, Shi Y, Yao J, Guo Y, Yang M, Zhang X, Zhang Q, Zeng C, Lin D (2007) A six-nucleotide insertion-deletion polymorphism in the CASP8 promoter is associated with susceptibility to multiple cancers. Nat Genet 39: 605–613 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tomlinson I, Webb E, Carvajal-Carmona L, Broderick P, Kemp Z, Spain S, Penegar S, Chandler I, Gorman M, Wood W, Barclay E, Lubbe S, Martin L, Sellick G, Jaeger E, Hubner R, Wild R, Rowan A, Fielding S, Howarth K, Silver A, Atkin W, Muir K, Logan R, Kerr D, Johnstone E, Sieber O, Gray R, Thomas H, Peto J, Cazier JB, Houlston R (2007) A genome-wide association scan of tag SNPs identifies a susceptibility variant for colorectal cancer at 8q24.21. Nat Genet 39: 984–988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zanke BW, Greenwood CM, Rangrej J, Kustra R, Tenesa A, Farrington SM, Prendergast J, Olschwang S, Chiang T, Crowdy E, Ferretti V, Laflamme P, Sundararajan S, Roumy S, Olivier JF, Robidoux F, Sladek R, Montpetit A, Campbell P, Bezieau S, O’Shea AM, Zogopoulos G, Cotterchio M, Newcomb P, McLaughlin J, Younghusband B, Green R, Green J, Porteous ME, Campbell H, Blanche H, Sahbatou M, Tubacher E, Bonaiti-Pellie C, Buecher B, Riboli E, Kury S, Chanock SJ, Potter J, Thomas G, Gallinger S, Hudson TJ, Dunlop MG (2007) Genome-wide association scan identifies a colorectal cancer susceptibility locus on chromosome 8q24. Nat Genet 39: 989–994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES