Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1999 May;80(5-6):792–800. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690423

The development of a structured rating schedule (the BAS) to assess skills in breaking bad news

S J Miller 1, T Hope 2, D C Talbot 3
PMCID: PMC2362267  PMID: 10360657

Abstract

There has been considerable interest in how doctors break bad news, with calls from within the profession and from patients for doctors to improve their communication skills. In order to aid clinical training and assessment of the skills used in breaking bad news there is a need for a reliable, practical and valid, structured rating schedule. Such a rating schedule was compiled from agreed criteria in the literature. Video-taped recordings of simulated consultations breaking bad news were independently assessed by three raters using the schedule and compared to three experts who gave global ratings. The primary outcome measures were internal consistency of the schedule and level of agreement between raters. The internal consistency was high with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.93. Agreement between raters using the schedule was moderate to good. The majority of the variation in scores was due to the differences in skills demonstrated in the interviews. The agreement between raters not using the schedule was poor. The BAS provides a simple to use, reliable, and consistent rating schedule for assessing skills used in breaking bad news. It could be a valuable aid to teaching this difficult task. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign

Keywords: breaking bad news, communication skills, assessment, cancer

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (143.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Cronbach's alpha. BMJ. 1997 Feb 22;314(7080):572–572. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brennan P., Silman A., Black C., Bernstein R., Coppock J., Maddison P., Sheeran T., Stevens C., Wollheim F. Reliability of skin involvement measures in scleroderma. The UK Scleroderma Study Group. Br J Rheumatol. 1992 Jul;31(7):457–460. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/31.7.457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brennan P., Silman A. Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. BMJ. 1992 Jun 6;304(6840):1491–1494. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6840.1491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burton M. V., Parker R. W. Psychological aspects of cancer surgery: surgeons' attitudes and opinions. Psychooncology. 1997 Mar;6(1):47–64. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199703)6:1<47::AID-PON248>3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Butow P. N., Dunn S. M., Tattersall M. H., Jones Q. J. Computer-based interaction analysis of the cancer consultation. Br J Cancer. 1995 May;71(5):1115–1121. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1995.216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Butow P. N., Kazemi J. N., Beeney L. J., Griffin A. M., Dunn S. M., Tattersall M. H. When the diagnosis is cancer: patient communication experiences and preferences. Cancer. 1996 Jun 15;77(12):2630–2637. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960615)77:12<2630::AID-CNCR29>3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Butow P. N., Maclean M., Dunn S. M., Tattersall M. H., Boyer M. J. The dynamics of change: cancer patients' preferences for information, involvement and support. Ann Oncol. 1997 Sep;8(9):857–863. doi: 10.1023/a:1008284006045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eggly S., Afonso N., Rojas G., Baker M., Cardozo L., Robertson R. S. An assessment of residents' competence in the delivery of bad news to patients. Acad Med. 1997 May;72(5):397–399. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199705000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fallowfield L. Giving sad and bad news. Lancet. 1993 Feb 20;341(8843):476–478. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90219-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fallowfield L. Psychosocial interventions in cancer. BMJ. 1995 Nov 18;311(7016):1316–1317. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7016.1316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ford S., Fallowfield L., Lewis S. Doctor-patient interactions in oncology. Soc Sci Med. 1996 Jun;42(11):1511–1519. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00265-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Garg A., Buckman R., Kason Y. Teaching medical students how to break bad news. CMAJ. 1997 Apr 15;156(8):1159–1164. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gillard J. H., Dent T. H., Aarons E. J., Crimlisk H. L., Smyth-Pigott P. J., Nicholls M. W. Preregistration house officers in the Thames regions: changes in quality of training after four years. BMJ. 1993 Nov 6;307(6913):1176–1179. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6913.1176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Girgis A., Sanson-Fisher R. W., McCarthy W. H. Communicating with patients: surgeons' perceptions of their skills and need for training. Aust N Z J Surg. 1997 Nov;67(11):775–780. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1997.tb04578.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hamajima N., Tajima K., Morishita M., Hyodo C., Sakakibara N., Kawai C., Moritaka S. Patients' expectations of information provided at cancer hospitals in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1996 Oct;26(5):362–367. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jjco.a023246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kalet A., Earp J. A., Kowlowitz V. How well do faculty evaluate the interviewing skills of medical students? J Gen Intern Med. 1992 Sep-Oct;7(5):499–505. doi: 10.1007/BF02599452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lazarus R. S. Coping theory and research: past, present, and future. Psychosom Med. 1993 May-Jun;55(3):234–247. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199305000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Loge J. H., Kaasa S., Hytten K. Disclosing the cancer diagnosis: the patients' experiences. Eur J Cancer. 1997 May;33(6):878–882. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00001-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Maguire P., Fairbairn S., Fletcher C. Consultation skills of young doctors: I--Benefits of feedback training in interviewing as students persist. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Jun 14;292(6535):1573–1576. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6535.1573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Maguire P., Fairbairn S., Fletcher C. Consultation skills of young doctors: II--Most young doctors are bad at giving information. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Jun 14;292(6535):1576–1578. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6535.1576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Maguire P., Faulkner A. Communicate with cancer patients: 1. Handling bad news and difficult questions. BMJ. 1988 Oct 8;297(6653):907–909. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6653.907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Noel G. L., Herbers J. E., Jr, Caplow M. P., Cooper G. S., Pangaro L. N., Harvey J. How well do internal medicine faculty members evaluate the clinical skills of residents? Ann Intern Med. 1992 Nov 1;117(9):757–765. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-9-757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Parle M., Jones B., Maguire P. Maladaptive coping and affective disorders among cancer patients. Psychol Med. 1996 Jul;26(4):735–744. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700037752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ptacek J. T., Eberhardt T. L. Breaking bad news. A review of the literature. JAMA. 1996 Aug 14;276(6):496–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sell L., Devlin B., Bourke S. J., Munro N. C., Corris P. A., Gibson G. J. Communicating the diagnosis of lung cancer. Respir Med. 1993 Jan;87(1):61–63. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(05)80315-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Stewart M. A. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995 May 1;152(9):1423–1433. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES