Skip to main content
PMC home page
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1999 Feb;79(3-4):501–508. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690078

The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress

A Cull 1, E D C Anderson 2, S Campbell 1, J Mackay 2, E Smyth 2, M Steel 2
PMCID: PMC2362435  PMID: 10027320

Abstract

Women referred to a familial breast cancer clinic completed questionnaires before and after counselling and at annual follow-up to assess their risk estimate and psychological characteristics. The aims were to determine whether those who attended the clinic overestimated their risk or were highly anxious and whether counselling influenced risk estimates and levels of distress. Women (n = 450) at this clinic were more likely to underestimate (39%) than overestimate (14%) their risk. Mean trait anxiety scores were higher than general population data (t = 4.9, n = 1059, P < 0.001) but not significantly different from published data from other screening samples. Overestimators (z = 5.69, P < 0.0001) and underestimators (z = –8.01, P < 0.0001) reported significantly different risk estimates (i.e. increased accuracy) after counselling, but significant inaccuracies persisted. Over- (n = 12) and underestimators (n = 60) were still inaccurate in their risk estimates by a factor of 2 after counselling. Thirty per cent of the sample scored above the cut-off (5/6) for case identification on a screening measure for psychological distress, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). GHQ scores were significantly lower after counselling (t = 3.6, d.f. = 384, P = 0.0004) with no evidence of increasing risk estimate causing increased distress. The risk of distress after counselling was greater for younger women and those who were more distressed at first presentation. The counselling offered was effective in increasing the accuracy of risk perceptions without causing distress to those who initially underestimated their risk. It is worrying that inaccuracies persisted, particularly as the demand for service has since reduced the consultation time offered in this clinic. Further work is needed to evaluate alternative models of service delivery using more sophisticated methods of assessing understanding of risk. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign

Keywords: breast cancer genetics, risk counselling, psychological distress, risk perception

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (100.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Claus E. B., Risch N., Thompson W. D. Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study. Am J Hum Genet. 1991 Feb;48(2):232–242. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cull A., Miller H., Porterfield T., Mackay J., Anderson E. D., Steel C. M., Elton R. A. The use of videotaped information in cancer genetic counselling: a randomized evaluation study. Br J Cancer. 1998 Mar;77(5):830–837. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Evans D. G., Blair V., Greenhalgh R., Hopwood P., Howell A. The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1994 Nov;70(5):934–938. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Evans D. G., Burnell L. D., Hopwood P., Howell A. Perception of risk in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1993 Mar;67(3):612–614. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1993.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fallowfield L. J., Rodway A., Baum M. What are the psychological factors influencing attendance, non-attendance and re-attendance at a breast screening centre? J R Soc Med. 1990 Sep;83(9):547–551. doi: 10.1177/014107689008300905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Knight R. G., Waal-Manning H. J., Spears G. F. Some norms and reliability data for the State--Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Zung Self-Rating Depression scale. Br J Clin Psychol. 1983 Nov;22(Pt 4):245–249. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1983.tb00610.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lerman C., Daly M., Masny A., Balshem A. Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol. 1994 Apr;12(4):843–850. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.4.843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lerman C., Daly M., Sands C., Balshem A., Lustbader E., Heggan T., Goldstein L., James J., Engstrom P. Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Jul 7;85(13):1074–1080. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.13.1074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lerman C., Kash K., Stefanek M. Younger women at increased risk for breast cancer: perceived risk, psychological well-being, and surveillance behavior. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1994;(16):171–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lerman C., Lustbader E., Rimer B., Daly M., Miller S., Sands C., Balshem A. Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 Feb 15;87(4):286–292. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.4.286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lloyd S., Watson M., Waites B., Meyer L., Eeles R., Ebbs S., Tylee A. Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling. Br J Cancer. 1996 Aug;74(3):482–487. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1996.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Marks G., Richardson J. L., Graham J. W., Levine A. Role of health locus of control beliefs and expectations of treatment efficacy in adjustment to cancer. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Aug;51(2):443–450. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.2.443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Miller S. M. Monitoring and blunting: validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Feb;52(2):345–353. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.2.345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Morris T., Greer S. Psychological characteristics of women electing to attend a breast screening clinic. Clin Oncol. 1982 Jun;8(2):113–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pharoah P. D., Day N. E., Duffy S., Easton D. F., Ponder B. A. Family history and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 1997 May 29;71(5):800–809. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19970529)71:5<800::aid-ijc18>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Richards M., Ponder M. Lay understanding of genetics: a test of a hypothesis. J Med Genet. 1996 Dec;33(12):1032–1036. doi: 10.1136/jmg.33.12.1032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Steptoe A. An abbreviated version of the Miller Behavioral Style Scale. Br J Clin Psychol. 1989 May;28(Pt 2):183–184. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1989.tb00830.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Thirlaway K., Fallowfield L., Nunnerley H., Powles T. Anxiety in women "at risk' of developing breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1996 Jun;73(11):1422–1424. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1996.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES