Abstract
The balanced presentation afforded by convening a Citizens' Jury when considering a major question such as the introduction of a breast screening programme is advocated. This method would enable account to be taken of all the costs, both human and financial, to all those affected, both participating and organizing, as well as the benefits. Provision of such a democratic opportunity enables consideration to be given to a broad range of factors, by selection of an appropriate range of witnesses, with the advantage of involving the lay public in this decision-making process. Attendance by health correspondents, medical journalists and other media representatives enables publicization of a democracy in action whilst helping to inform the wider debate. Such an exercise could inform whether the NHS BSP should continue in its current form. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign
Keywords: screening; citizens’; jury, democratic decision-making; information provision; psychological morbidity
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (45.9 KB).
Footnotes
This editorial is based on a paper presented at the First Presidential Symposium of the British Oncological Association, 2 March 1998 at the Royal Society of Medicine