Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1999 Feb;79(5-6):825–830. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690132

Timing of illumination is essential for effective and safe photodynamic therapy: a study in the normal rat oesophagus

J van den Boogert 1, R van Hillegersberg 2, H J van Staveren 2, R W F de Bruin 2, H van Dekken 4, P D Siersema 4, H W Tilanus 4
PMCID: PMC2362665  PMID: 10070876

Abstract

5-Aminolaevulinic acid (ALA)-induced, protoporphyrin IX (PpIX)-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an experimental treatment modality for (pre)malignant oesophageal lesions. This study aimed to optimize the time of illumination after ALA administration. Six groups of eight rats received 200 mg kg−1ALA orally, eight rats served as controls. Illumination was performed at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 or 12 h after ALA administration with a 1-cm cylindrical diffuser placed in a balloon catheter (laser parameters: 633 nm, 25 J radiant energy, power output 100 mW). During illumination, fluorescence measurements and light dosimetry were performed. Animals were sacrificed at 48 h (n= 4) or 28 days (n= 4) after PDT. At day 28, an oesophagogram was performed. Largest PpIX fluorescence was found at 3 h after ALA administration. In vivo fluence rate was three times higher than the calculated incident fluence rate. At 48 h after PDT, major epithelial damage was found in all animals illuminated at 2 h, whereas less epithelial damage was found at 3–6 h and none at 1 and 12 h. In animals illuminated at 4, 6 and 12 h, but not at 2 h, oesophagograms showed severe dilatations and histology showed loss of Schwann cells. These results demonstrate that the choice of time interval between ALA administration and illumination is critical for achieving epithelial damage without oesophageal functional impairment. A short interval of 2–3 h seems to be most appropriate. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign

Keywords: 5-aminolaevulinic acid, oesophagus, illumination, nerve, photodynamic therapy, rat

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (219.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barr H., Shepherd N. A., Dix A., Roberts D. J., Tan W. C., Krasner N. Eradication of high-grade dysplasia in columnar-lined (Barrett's) oesophagus by photodynamic therapy with endogenously generated protoporphyrin IX. Lancet. 1996 Aug 31;348(9027):584–585. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)03054-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berthet B., di Costanzo J., Arnaud C., Choux R., Assadourian R. Influence of epidermal growth factor and interferon gamma on healing of oesophageal corrosive burns in the rat. Br J Surg. 1994 Mar;81(3):395–398. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blot W. J., Devesa S. S., Kneller R. W., Fraumeni J. F., Jr Rising incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. JAMA. 1991 Mar 13;265(10):1287–1289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cameron A. J., Lomboy C. T., Pera M., Carpenter H. A. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 1995 Nov;109(5):1541–1546. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90642-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cowled P. A., Forbes I. J. Photocytotoxicity in vivo of haematoporphyrin derivative components. Cancer Lett. 1985 Aug;28(1):111–118. doi: 10.1016/0304-3835(85)90099-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Forssell H. Gastric mucosal defence mechanisms: a brief review. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1988;155:23–28. doi: 10.3109/00365528809096277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jackson M. J., O'Farrell S. Free radicals and muscle damage. Br Med Bull. 1993 Jul;49(3):630–641. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Laukka M. A., Wang K. K. Initial results using low-dose photodynamic therapy in the treatment of Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995 Jul;42(1):59–63. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(95)70245-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Messmann H., Mlkvy P., Buonaccorsi G., Davies C. L., MacRobert A. J., Bown S. G. Enhancement of photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolaevulinic acid-induced porphyrin photosensitisation in normal rat colon by threshold and light fractionation studies. Br J Cancer. 1995 Sep;72(3):589–594. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1995.378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nada O., Kawana T. Immunohistochemical identification of supportive cell types in the enteric nervous system of the rat colon and rectum. Cell Tissue Res. 1988 Mar;251(3):523–529. doi: 10.1007/BF00213999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Panjehpour M., Overholt B. F., DeNovo R. C., Petersen M. G., Sneed R. E. Comparative study between pulsed and continuous wave lasers for Photofrin photodynamic therapy. Lasers Surg Med. 1993;13(3):296–304. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1900130306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Robinson D. J., de Bruijn H. S., van der Veen N., Stringer M. R., Brown S. B., Star W. M. Fluorescence photobleaching of ALA-induced protoporphyrin IX during photodynamic therapy of normal hairless mouse skin: the effect of light dose and irradiance and the resulting biological effect. Photochem Photobiol. 1998 Jan;67(1):140–149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Urano S., Asai Y., Makabe S., Matsuo M., Izumiyama N., Ohtsubo K., Endo T. Oxidative injury of synapse and alteration of antioxidative defense systems in rats, and its prevention by vitamin E. Eur J Biochem. 1997 Apr 1;245(1):64–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00064.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang K. K. Barrett's esophagus: current and future management. Compr Ther. 1994;20(1):36–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Whetsell W. O., Jr, Sassa S., Bickers D., Kappas A. Studies on porphyrin-heme biosynthesis in organotypic cultures of chick dorsal root ganglion. I. Observations on neuronal and non-neuronal elements. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1978 Sep;37(5):497–507. doi: 10.1097/00005072-197809000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhou C. N., Yang W. Z., Ding Z. X., Wang Y. X., Shen H., Fan X. J., Ha X. W. The biological effects of photodynamic therapy on normal skin in mice--II. An electron microscopic study. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1985;193:111–115. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-2165-1_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. van Staveren H. J., Beek J. F., Ramaekers J. W., Keijzer M., Star W. M. Integrating sphere effect in whole bladder wall photodynamic therapy: I. 532 nm versus 630 nm optical irradiation. Phys Med Biol. 1994 Jun;39(6):947–959. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/39/6/003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES