Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 2000 Feb 21;82(6):1131–1137. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.1052

Sphincter-sparing surgery after preoperative radiotherapy for low rectal cancers: feasibility, oncologic results and quality of life outcomes

A S Allal 1, S Bieri 3, A Pelloni 4, V Spataro 5, S Anchisi 1, P Ambrosetti 2, M A G Sprangers 6, J M Kurtz 1, P Gertsch 4
PMCID: PMC2363346  PMID: 10735495

Abstract

The present study assesses the choice of surgical procedure, oncologic results and quality of life (QOL) outcomes in a retrospective cohort of 53 patients with low-lying rectal cancers (within 6 cm of the anal verge) treated surgically following preoperative radiotherapy (RT, median dose 45 Gy) with or without concomitant 5-fluorouracil. QOL was assessed in 23 patients by using two questionnaires developed by the QOL Study Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer: EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-CR38. After a median interval of 29 days from completion of RT, abdominoperineal resection (APR) was performed in 29 patients (55%), low anterior resection in 23 patients (20 with coloanal anastomosis) and transrectal excision in one patient. The 3-year actuarial overall survival and locoregional control rates were 71.4% and 77.5% respectively, with no differences observed between patients operated by APR or restorative procedures. For all scales of EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-CR38, no significant differences in median scores were observed between the two surgical groups. Although patients having had APR tended to report a lower body image score (P = 0.12) and more sexual dysfunction in male patients, all APR patients tended to report better physical function, future perspective and global QOL. In conclusion, sphincter-sparing surgery after preoperative RT seems to be feasible, in routine practice, in a significant proportion of low rectal cancers without compromising the oncologic results. However, prospective studies are mandatory to confirm this finding and to clarify the putative QOL advantages of sphincter-conserving approaches. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign

Keywords: low rectal cancers, radiotherapy, restorative surgery

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (80.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aaronson N. K., Ahmedzai S., Bergman B., Bullinger M., Cull A., Duez N. J., Filiberti A., Flechtner H., Fleishman S. B., de Haes J. C. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365–376. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allal A. S. Cancer du bas rectum: vers une approche thérapeutique conservatrice intégrant la radiothérapie. Bull Cancer. 1996 Mar;83(3):189–196. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berger C., de Muret A., Garaud P., Chapet S., Bourlier P., Reynaud-Bougnoux A., Dorval E., de Calan L., Huten N., le Folch O. Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) for rectal cancer: predictive factors of tumor downstaging and residual tumor cell density (RTCD): prognostic implications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Feb 1;37(3):619–627. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00577-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Billingham R. P. Conservative treatment of rectal cancer. Extending the indications. Cancer. 1992 Sep 1;70(5 Suppl):1355–1363. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920901)70:3+<1355::aid-cncr2820701525>3.0.co;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dahlberg M., Glimelius B., Graf W., Påhlman L. Preoperative irradiation affects functional results after surgery for rectal cancer: results from a randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998 May;41(5):543–551. doi: 10.1007/BF02235256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Friedmann P., Garb J. L., McCabe D. P., Chabot J. R., Park W. C., Stark A., Coe N. P., Page D. W. Intestinal anastomosis after preoperative radiation therapy for carcinoma of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1987 Mar;164(3):257–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Frigell A., Ottander M., Stenbeck H., Påhlman L. Quality of life of patients treated with abdominoperineal resection or anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1990;79(1):26–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Grann A., Minsky B. D., Cohen A. M., Saltz L., Guillem J. G., Paty P. B., Kelsen D. P., Kemeny N., Ilson D., Bass-Loeb J. Preliminary results of preoperative 5-fluorouracil, low-dose leucovorin, and concurrent radiation therapy for clinically resectable T3 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997 May;40(5):515–522. doi: 10.1007/BF02055370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Heald R. J., Karanjia N. D. Results of radical surgery for rectal cancer. World J Surg. 1992 Sep-Oct;16(5):848–857. doi: 10.1007/BF02066981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Heald R. J., Ryall R. D. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1986 Jun 28;1(8496):1479–1482. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91510-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hyams D. M., Mamounas E. P., Petrelli N., Rockette H., Jones J., Wieand H. S., Deutsch M., Wickerham L., Fisher B., Wolmark N. A clinical trial to evaluate the worth of preoperative multimodality therapy in patients with operable carcinoma of the rectum: a progress report of National Surgical Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-03. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997 Feb;40(2):131–139. doi: 10.1007/BF02054976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Klee M., Groenvold M., Machin D. Quality of life of Danish women: population-based norms of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res. 1997 Jan;6(1):27–34. doi: 10.1023/a:1026461310761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lewis W. G., Williamson M. E., Kuzu A., Stephenson B. M., Holdsworth P. J., Finan P. J., Ash D., Johnston D. Potential disadvantages of post-operative adjuvant radiotherapy after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a pilot study of sphincter function, rectal capacity and clinical outcome. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;10(3):133–137. doi: 10.1007/BF00298533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lundby L., Jensen V. J., Overgaard J., Laurberg S. Long-term colorectal function after postoperative radiotherapy for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1997 Aug 23;350(9077):564–564. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)63141-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Maas C. P., Moriya Y., Steup W. H., Kiebert G. M., Kranenbarg W. M., van de Velde C. J. Radical and nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer in The Netherlands: a prospective study on morbidity and functional outcome. Br J Surg. 1998 Jan;85(1):92–97. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00530.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MacDonald L. D., Anderson H. R. The health of rectal cancer patients in the community. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1985 Sep;11(3):235–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Marks G., Mohiuddin M., Masoni L. The reality of radical sphincter preservation surgery for cancer of the distal 3 cm of rectum following high-dose radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993 Nov 15;27(4):779–783. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90449-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Marquis R., Lasry J. C., Heppell J., Potvin C., Falardeau M., Robidoux A. Qualité de vie des patients opérés à visée curative pour un cancer du rectum. Ann Chir. 1992;46(9):830–838. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Minsky B. D., Cohen A. M., Enker W. E., Paty P. Sphincter preservation with preoperative radiation therapy and coloanal anastomosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Feb 1;31(3):553–559. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)00375-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mohiuddin M., Regine W. F., Marks G. J., Marks J. W. High-dose preoperative radiation and the challenge of sphincter-preservation surgery for cancer of the distal 2 cm of the rectum. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Feb 1;40(3):569–574. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00842-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Papillon J., Gerard J. P. Role of radiotherapy in anal preservation for cancers of the lower third of the rectum. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1990 Nov;19(5):1219–1220. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(90)90233-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pollett W. G., Nicholls R. J. The relationship between the extent of distal clearance and survival and local recurrence rates after curative anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg. 1983 Aug;198(2):159–163. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198308000-00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Quirke P., Durdey P., Dixon M. F., Williams N. S. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet. 1986 Nov 1;2(8514):996–999. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)92612-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rouanet P., Fabre J. M., Dubois J. B., Dravet F., Saint Aubert B., Pradel J., Ychou M., Solassol C., Pujol H. Conservative surgery for low rectal carcinoma after high-dose radiation. Functional and oncologic results. Ann Surg. 1995 Jan;221(1):67–73. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199501000-00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sprangers M. A., Taal B. G., Aaronson N. K., te Velde A. Quality of life in colorectal cancer. Stoma vs. nonstoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 Apr;38(4):361–369. doi: 10.1007/BF02054222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Williams N. S., Dixon M. F., Johnston D. Reappraisal of the 5 centimetre rule of distal excision for carcinoma of the rectum: a study of distal intramural spread and of patients' survival. Br J Surg. 1983 Mar;70(3):150–154. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800700305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Williams N. S., Johnston D. The quality of life after rectal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1983 Aug;70(8):460–462. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800700805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wirsching M., Drüner H. U., Herrmann G. Results of psychosocial adjustment to long-term colostomy. Psychother Psychosom. 1975;26(5):245–256. doi: 10.1159/000286938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES