Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 2000 Dec;83(12):1740–1746. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1514

Characterization of DNA-strand breakage induced in V79 cells by F 11782, a catalytic inhibitor of topoisomerases

J-M Barret 1, B T Hill 1, P L Olive 2
PMCID: PMC2363439  PMID: 11104575

Abstract

DNA damage induced in V79 cells by F 11782, or 2″,3″-bis pentafluorophenoxyacetyl-4′,′-ethylidene-β-D glucoside of 4′-phosphate-′-demethylepipodophyllotoxin 2N-methyl glucamine salt, a novel dual catalytic inhibitor of topoisomerases I and II, was investigated using both alkaline and neutral versions of the comet assay methodology. A comparison was then made of the DNA damage induced by F 11782 with that induced by either etoposide or camptothecin under comparable experimental conditions. The results revealed that F 11782 initially induced less DNA strand breaks that either etoposide or camptothecin and rejoined such breaks more slowly. However, unlike these other drugs, the extent of DNA damage induced by F 11782 increased linearly with time of incubation. F 11782 produced both DNA single- and double-strand breaks without any clear specificity relative to phase of the cell cycle, although proliferating cells were preferentially damaged. The marked time-dependency of induction of DNA strand breaks by F 11782 may serve to explain, at least in part, its major in vivo antitumour activities. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com

Keywords: F 11782, catalytic topoisomerase inhibitor, DNA-strand breaks, comet assay

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (98.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Durand R. E. Use of Hoechst 33342 for cell selection from multicell systems. J Histochem Cytochem. 1982 Feb;30(2):117–122. doi: 10.1177/30.2.6174559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Klaude M., Eriksson S., Nygren J., Ahnström G. The comet assay: mechanisms and technical considerations. Mutat Res. 1996 Jun 12;363(2):89–96. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(95)00063-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ng S. W., Liu Y., Hasselblatt K. T., Mok S. C., Berkowitz R. S. A new human topoisomerase III that interacts with SGS1 protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Feb 15;27(4):993–1000. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.4.993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Nitiss J. L. Investigating the biological functions of DNA topoisomerases in eukaryotic cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998 Oct 1;1400(1-3):63–81. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4781(98)00128-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Olive P. L., Banáth J. P., Durand R. E. Detection of subpopulations resistant to DNA-damaging agents in spheroids and murine tumours. Mutat Res. 1997 Apr 29;375(2):157–165. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(97)00011-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Olive P. L., Banáth J. P., Durand R. E. Heterogeneity in radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in tumor and normal cells measured using the "comet" assay. Radiat Res. 1990 Apr;122(1):86–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Olive P. L., Banáth J. P., Evans H. H. Cell killing and DNA damage by etoposide in Chinese hamster V79 monolayers and spheroids: influence of growth kinetics, growth environment and DNA packaging. Br J Cancer. 1993 Mar;67(3):522–530. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1993.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Olive P. L., Banáth J. P. Induction and rejoining of radiation-induced DNA single-strand breaks: "tail moment" as a function of position in the cell cycle. Mutat Res. 1993 Oct;294(3):275–283. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(93)90010-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Olive P. L., Johnston P. J. DNA damage from oxidants: influence of lesion complexity and chromatin organization. Oncol Res. 1997;9(6-7):287–294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Perrin D., van Hille B., Barret J. M., Kruczynski A., Etiévant C., Imbert T., Hill B. T. F 11782, a novel epipodophylloid non-intercalating dual catalytic inhibitor of topoisomerases I and II with an original mechanism of action. Biochem Pharmacol. 2000 Apr 1;59(7):807–819. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(99)00382-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sutherland R. M. Cell and environment interactions in tumor microregions: the multicell spheroid model. Science. 1988 Apr 8;240(4849):177–184. doi: 10.1126/science.2451290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES