Skip to main content
PMC home page
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 2001 Jan 1;84(1):64–71. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1548

Evaluation of the 5th edition of the TNM classification for gastric cancer: improved prognostic value

E Klein Kranenbarg 1, J Hermans 2, J H J M van Krieken 3, C J H van de Velde 1
PMCID: PMC2363617  PMID: 11139315

Abstract

The main change in the 5th edition (1997) of the TNM classification for gastric cancer compared to the 4th edition (1987) is the use of the number of involved nodes instead of the location of positive nodes. As a result stage grouping is also altered. A second change is the requirement for the examination of at least 15 nodes to justify the N0 status. Patients with fewer examined negative nodes are unclassifiable (Nx). Data were retrieved from a randomized trial database comparing D1 and D2 dissection and 633 curatively operated patients were included. According to the criteria of the 5th edition, 39% of the node-positive patients had another N stage compared to the 4th: 21% had a lower and 18% had a higher stage. 5-year survival rates according to the 4th edition N0, N1 and N2 groups were respectively 72%, 34% and 27%. According to the 5th edition these percentages were for the N0, N1, N2, N3 and Nx groups respectively 75%, 38%, 19%, 8% and 65%. The former 1987 N1 and N2 group were significantly split into three new N 1997 groups (P = 0.006, respectively P< 0.0005). The Cox's regression analysis showed the N 1997 classification to be the most important prognostic variable, with a higher prognostic value than N 1987. In addition, the new TNM stage was also a better prognosticator. The requirement for examining at least 15 nodes, however, could not be fulfilled in 38% of all node-negative patients and we found that a minimum of 5 consecutive negative lymph nodes is a reliable number for staging purposes. We conclude that the 5th edition of the TNM classification provides a better estimation of prognosis, however, examination of at least 15 negative regional lymph nodes is too high a threshold and 5 gives similar prognostic value. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com

Keywords: TNM classification, gastric cancer, prognosis

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (115.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aiko Takashi, Sasako Mitsuru. The new Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma: Points to be revised. Gastric Cancer. 1998 Dec;1(1):25–30. doi: 10.1007/s101200050052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonenkamp J. J., Hermans J., Sasako M., van de Velde C. J., Welvaart K., Songun I., Meyer S., Plukker J. T., Van Elk P., Obertop H. Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999 Mar 25;340(12):908–914. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903253401202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bunt A. M., Hermans J., van de Velde C. J., Sasako M., Hoefsloot F. A., Fleuren G., Bruijn J. A. Lymph node retrieval in a randomized trial on western-type versus Japanese-type surgery in gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1996 Aug;14(8):2289–2294. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.8.2289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Candela F. C., Urmacher C., Brennan M. F. Comparison of the conventional method of lymph node staging with a comprehensive fat-clearing method for gastric adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 1990 Oct 15;66(8):1828–1832. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19901015)66:8<1828::aid-cncr2820660830>3.0.co;2-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Caplin S., Cerottini J. P., Bosman F. T., Constanda M. T., Givel J. C. For patients with Dukes' B (TNM Stage II) colorectal carcinoma, examination of six or fewer lymph nodes is related to poor prognosis. Cancer. 1998 Aug 15;83(4):666–672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cuschieri A., Weeden S., Fielding J., Bancewicz J., Craven J., Joypaul V., Sydes M., Fayers P. Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial. Surgical Co-operative Group. Br J Cancer. 1999 Mar;79(9-10):1522–1530. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Estes N. C., MacDonald J. S., Touijer K., Benedetti J., Jacobson J. Inadequate documentation and resection for gastric cancer in the United States: a preliminary report. Am Surg. 1998 Jul;64(7):680–685. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fujii K., Isozaki H., Okajima K., Nomura E., Niki M., Sako S., Izumi N., Mabuchi H., Nishiguchi K., Tanigawa N. Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system. Br J Surg. 1999 May;86(5):685–689. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01115.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hermanek P., Altendorf-Hofmann A., Mansmann U., Dworak O., Wittekind C., Hohenberger W. Improvements in staging of gastric carcinoma from using the new edition of TNM classification. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1998 Dec;24(6):536–541. doi: 10.1016/s0748-7983(98)93536-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hermanek P. Onkologische Chirurgie/Pathologisch-anatomische Sicht. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1991:277–281. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ichikura T., Tomimatsu S., Okusa Y., Uefuji K., Tamakuma S. Comparison of the prognostic significance between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and nodal stage based on their location in patients with gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Oct;11(10):1894–1900. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.10.1894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ichikura T., Tomimatsu S., Uefuji K., Kimura M., Uchida T., Morita D., Mochizuki H. Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union against cancer classification of lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma in comparison with the Japanese classification. Cancer. 1999 Aug 15;86(4):553–558. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990815)86:4<553::aid-cncr2>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ishida K., Katsuyama T., Sugiyama A., Kawasaki S. Immunohistochemical evaluation of lymph node micrometastases from gastric carcinomas. Cancer. 1997 Mar 15;79(6):1069–1076. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970315)79:6<1069::aid-cncr3>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Isozaki H., Okajima K., Fujii K. Histological evaluation of lymph node metastasis on serial sectioning in gastric cancer with radical lymphadenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997 Jul-Aug;44(16):1133–1136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma - 2nd English Edition - Gastric Cancer. 1998 Dec;1(1):10–24. doi: 10.1007/s101209800016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kajitani T. The general rules for the gastric cancer study in surgery and pathology. Part I. Clinical classification. Jpn J Surg. 1981 Mar;11(2):127–139. doi: 10.1007/BF02468883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kato M., Saji S., Kawaguchi Y., Kunieda K., Sugiyama Y., Takagi Y., Hiraoka T., Kumazawa I., Adachi T. A comparison of the prognostic significance between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and nodal stage in gastric carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999 Nov-Dec;46(30):3281–3286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim J. P., Hur Y. S., Yang H. K. Lymph node metastasis as a significant prognostic factor in early gastric cancer: analysis of 1,136 early gastric cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 1995 Jul;2(4):308–313. doi: 10.1007/BF02307062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim J. P., Yang H. K., Oh S. T. Is the new UICC staging system of gastric cancer reasonable? (Comparison of 5-year survival rate of gastric cancer by old and new UICC stage classification). Surg Oncol. 1992 Jun;1(3):209–213. doi: 10.1016/0960-7404(92)90066-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kodera Y., Yamamura Y., Shimizu Y., Torii A., Hirai T., Yasui K., Morimoto T., Kato T., Kito T. Metastatic gastric lymph node rate is a significant prognostic factor for resectable stage IV stomach cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 1997 Jul;185(1):65–69. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(97)00006-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kodera Y., Yamamura Y., Shimizu Y., Torii A., Hirai T., Yasui K., Morimoto T., Kato T., Kito T. The number of metastatic lymph nodes: a promising prognostic determinant for gastric carcinoma in the latest edition of the TNM classification. J Am Coll Surg. 1998 Dec;187(6):597–603. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00229-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Koren R., Kyzer S., Levin I., Klein B., Halpern M., Rath-Wolfson L., Paz A., Melloul M. M., Mishali M., Gal R. Lymph node revealing solution: a new method for lymph node sampling: results in gastric adenocarcinoma. Oncol Rep. 1998 Mar-Apr;5(2):341–344. doi: 10.3892/or.5.2.341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mendes de Almeida J. C., Limbert M., Mendes de Almeida J. M. Does the new TNM classification (1997) improve prognostic stratification in gastric cancer submitted to R0 surgery? Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999 Jun;25(3):280–283. doi: 10.1053/ejso.1998.0642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mori M., Mimori K., Inoue H., Barnard G. F., Tsuji K., Nanbara S., Ueo H., Akiyoshi T. Detection of cancer micrometastases in lymph nodes by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Cancer Res. 1995 Aug 1;55(15):3417–3420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Roder J. D., Böttcher K., Busch R., Wittekind C., Hermanek P., Siewert J. R. Classification of regional lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma. German Gastric Cancer Study Group. Cancer. 1998 Feb 15;82(4):621–631. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Siewert J. R., Böttcher K., Roder J. D., Busch R., Hermanek P., Meyer H. J. Prognostic relevance of systematic lymph node dissection in gastric carcinoma. German Gastric Carcinoma Study Group. Br J Surg. 1993 Aug;80(8):1015–1018. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wagner P. K., Ramaswamy A., Rüschoff J., Schmitz-Moormann P., Rothmund M. Lymph node counts in the upper abdomen: anatomical basis for lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 1991 Jul;78(7):825–827. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wu C. W., Hsieh M. C., Lo S. S., Tsay S. H., Lui W. Y., P'eng F. K. Relation of number of positive lymph nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary gastric adenocarcinoma. Gut. 1996 Apr;38(4):525–527. doi: 10.1136/gut.38.4.525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yu W., Choi G. S., Whang I., Suh I. S. Comparison of five systems for staging lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 1997 Sep;84(9):1305–1309. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. de Manzoni G., Verlato G., Guglielmi A., Laterza E., Tomezzoli A., Pelosi G., Di Leo A., Cordiano C. Classification of lymph node metastases from carcinoma of the stomach: comparison of the old (1987) and new (1997) TNM systems. World J Surg. 1999 Jul;23(7):664–669. doi: 10.1007/pl00012365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES