Skip to main content
PMC home page
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 2001 Mar;84(5):594–599. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1651

Cancer risk perceptions and distress among women attending a familial ovarian cancer clinic

A Cull 1, A Fry 1, R Rush 1, C M Steel 2
PMCID: PMC2363794  PMID: 11237377

Abstract

Of 230 women referred to a familial ovarian cancer clinic, 196 (85%) completed a questionnaire before they attended. The data collected included pre-counselling risk perceptions and an assessment of distress. Respondents were more likely to underestimate (44%) than overestimate (19%) their risk. Those with a family history of breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) were particularly likely to underestimate their ovarian cancer risk. The variables assessed in this study – sociodemographic, family history, distress, anxiety proneness, coping style and beliefs about health control – explained little of the observed variation in accuracy of risk perception. On the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-30) 30% of the sample obtained scores above the cut-off (≥ 6) recommended for screening for ‘case-level’ psychological distress. Women exhibiting case-level distress were more likely to overestimate their risk (OR = 2.3). On univariate analysis low internal locus of control was associated with ‘case-level’ distress (P = 0.008). On multiple regression the best predictors of ‘caseness’ were high-trait anxiety, being a graduate and inaccurate risk perception. There was no difference in the level of distress shown by women with HBOC vs. those with a history of ovarian cancer only. Implications of these findings for the counselling needs of the women are discussed. The effectiveness of the clinic in improving the accuracy of risk perceptions and relieving distress is being assessed. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com

Keywords: ovarian cancer, psychological distress, cancer risk, genetic counselling

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (330.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Audrain J., Schwartz M. D., Lerman C., Hughes C., Peshkin B. N., Biesecker B. Psychological distress in women seeking genetic counseling for breast-ovarian cancer risk: the contributions of personality and appraisal. Ann Behav Med. 1997 Fall;19(4):370–377. doi: 10.1007/BF02895156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cuzick J. A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. Stat Med. 1985 Jan-Mar;4(1):87–90. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780040112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Daly M. B., Lerman C. Ovarian cancer risk counseling: a guide for the practitioner. Oncology (Williston Park) 1993 Nov;7(11):27-34; discussion 34, 37-8, 41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Erlick Robinson G., Rosen B. P., Bradley L. N., Rockert W. G., Carr M. L., Cole D. E., Murphy K. J. Psychological impact of screening for familial ovarian cancer: reactions to initial assessment. Gynecol Oncol. 1997 May;65(2):197–205. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1997.4686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Evans D. G., Blair V., Greenhalgh R., Hopwood P., Howell A. The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1994 Nov;70(5):934–938. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Evans D. G., Burnell L. D., Hopwood P., Howell A. Perception of risk in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1993 Mar;67(3):612–614. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1993.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ford D., Easton D. F., Peto J. Estimates of the gene frequency of BRCA1 and its contribution to breast and ovarian cancer incidence. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Dec;57(6):1457–1462. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Knight R. G., Waal-Manning H. J., Spears G. F. Some norms and reliability data for the State--Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Zung Self-Rating Depression scale. Br J Clin Psychol. 1983 Nov;22(Pt 4):245–249. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1983.tb00610.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lloyd S., Watson M., Waites B., Meyer L., Eeles R., Ebbs S., Tylee A. Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling. Br J Cancer. 1996 Aug;74(3):482–487. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1996.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Marks G., Richardson J. L., Graham J. W., Levine A. Role of health locus of control beliefs and expectations of treatment efficacy in adjustment to cancer. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Aug;51(2):443–450. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.2.443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Miller S. M. Monitoring and blunting: validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Feb;52(2):345–353. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.2.345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schwartz M. D., Lerman C., Miller S. M., Daly M., Masny A. Coping disposition, perceived risk, and psychological distress among women at increased risk for ovarian cancer. Health Psychol. 1995 May;14(3):232–235. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.14.3.232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Stratton J. F., Gayther S. A., Russell P., Dearden J., Gore M., Blake P., Easton D., Ponder B. A. Contribution of BRCA1 mutations to ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 1997 Apr 17;336(16):1125–1130. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199704173361602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wallston K. A., Wallston B. S., DeVellis R. Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales. Health Educ Monogr. 1978 Spring;6(2):160–170. doi: 10.1177/109019817800600107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wardle J. Women at risk of ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1995;(17):81–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES