Abstract
Marriages between third-degree and more distant relatives are common in many parts of the world. Offspring of consanguineous parents have increased morbidity and mortality related to recessive gene disorders. In a population with a high frequency of consanguinity, we examined the frequency of breast cancer (related in part to tumour genes) and cervical cancers (related to virus infection) among offspring of consanguineous and non-consanguineous parents. Study was done prospectively in the United Arab Emirates. Selected were married female citizens, ages 40–65, who attended 12 primary health care clinics for whatever reason. In a face-to-face interview, subjects were asked: (a) about consanguineous marriages in family; (b) if they have or have had breast or cervical cancer; (c) about family history of cancer, cancer screening and other parameters. Tumour diagnosis was confirmed by review of medical records. Of 1750 women invited into study, 1445 (79%) could be used in analysis. Among 579 (40%) women of consanguineous and 866 (60%) of non-consanguineous parents there were 24 and 54 with breast cancer, respectively (RR = 0.66, CI 0.42 – 1.06). In the 40 to 50 age group, breast cancer reported 13 of 446 women of consanguineous and 37 of 633 of non-consanguineous parents (RR = 0.50, Cl 0.27 – 0.93). Cervical cancer had 15 women in consanguineous and 32 in non-consanguineous group (RR = 0.70, Cl 0.38 – 1.28). Number of families with history of breast cancer in consanguineous and non-consanguineous group was 21 and 23, respectively (P = 0.29). The cancer screening rates and other variable values had fairly balanced distribution between the 2 groups. Having consanguineous parents decreases the risk of breast cancer especially in younger women, risk of cervical cancer being unaffected. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com
Keywords: breast cancer, cervical cancer, consanguinity, BRCA1, BRCA2
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (53.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Abdulrazzaq Y. M., Bener A., al-Gazali L. I., al-Khayat A. I., Micallef R., Gaber T. A study of possible deleterious effects of consanguinity. Clin Genet. 1997 Mar;51(3):167–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1997.tb02447.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alroy I., Yarden Y. The ErbB signaling network in embryogenesis and oncogenesis: signal diversification through combinatorial ligand-receptor interactions. FEBS Lett. 1997 Jun 23;410(1):83–86. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(97)00412-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Asha Bai P. V., John T. J., Subramaniam V. R. Reproductive wastage and developmental disorders in relation to consanguinity in south India. Trop Geogr Med. 1981 Sep;33(3):275–280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Başaran N., Hassa H., Başaran A., Artan S., Stevenson J. D., Sayli B. S. The effect of consanguinity on the reproductive wastage in the Turkish population. Clin Genet. 1989 Sep;36(3):168–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1989.tb03183.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bener A., Denic S., Al-Mazrouei M. Consanguinity and family history of cancer in children with leukemia and lymphomas. Cancer. 2001 Jul 1;92(1):1–6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010701)92:1<1::aid-cncr1284>3.0.co;2-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grant J. C., Bittles A. H. The comparative role of consanguinity in infant and childhood mortality in Pakistan. Ann Hum Genet. 1997 Mar;61(Pt 2):143–149. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-1809.1997.6120143.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hakem R., de la Pompa J. L., Mak T. W. Developmental studies of Brca1 and Brca2 knock-out mice. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 1998 Oct;3(4):431–445. doi: 10.1023/a:1018792200700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Imaizumi Y. A recent survey of consanguineous marriages in Japan. Clin Genet. 1986 Sep;30(3):230–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1986.tb00600.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jaber L., Halpern G. J., Shohat M. The impact of consanguinity worldwide. Community Genet. 1998;1(1):12–17. doi: 10.1159/000016130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parkin D. M., Pisani P., Ferlay J. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 1999 Jan-Feb;49(1):33-64, 1. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.49.1.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pavelić K., Pecina Slaus N., Spaventi R. Growth factors and proto-oncogenes in early mouse embryogenesis and tumorigenesis. Int J Dev Biol. 1991 Sep;35(3):209–214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saha N., Hamad R. E., Mohamed S. Inbreeding effects on reproductive outcome in a Sudanese population. Hum Hered. 1990;40(4):208–212. doi: 10.1159/000153932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shami S. A., Schmitt L. H., Bittles A. H. Consanguinity related prenatal and postnatal mortality of the populations of seven Pakistani Punjab cities. J Med Genet. 1989 Apr;26(4):267–271. doi: 10.1136/jmg.26.4.267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stoltenberg C., Magnus P., Skrondal A., Lie R. T. Consanguinity and recurrence risk of stillbirth and infant death. Am J Public Health. 1999 Apr;89(4):517–523. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.4.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sureender S., Prabakaran B., Khan A. G. Mate selection and its impact on female marriage age, pregnancy wastages, and first child survival in Tamil Nadu, India. Soc Biol. 1998 Fall-Winter;45(3-4):289–301. doi: 10.1080/19485565.1998.9988980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- al-Gazali L. I., Bener A., Abdulrazzaq Y. M., Micallef R., al-Khayat A. I., Gaber T. Consanguineous marriages in the United Arab Emirates. J Biosoc Sci. 1997 Oct;29(4):491–497. doi: 10.1017/s0021932097004914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]