Skip to main content
Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology logoLink to Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology
. 1994;1(4):182–187. doi: 10.1155/S1064744994000050

Rapid Polymerase Chain Reaction–Based Test for the Detection of Female Urogenital Chlamydial Infections

Harold C Wiesenfeld 1,, Michael Uhrin 1, Bruce W Dixon 2, Richard L Sweet 1
PMCID: PMC2364337  PMID: 18475342

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis Test (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, NJ), a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technique, as a screening test for the detection of female urogenital C. trachomatis infections, comparing it to an enzyme immunoassay method.

Methods: Endocervical specimens for PCR and Chlamydiazyme (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) analysis were obtained from 328 unselected patients at the outpatient Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinic at the Allegheny County Health Department, Pittsburgh, PA. In addition, urethral swabs for PCR analysis were obtained from 256 of these patients.

Results: By PCR analysis, the prevalence of urogenital chlamydial infections was 15.6% and that of cervical chlamydial infections was 10.7%. The sensitivity of PCR in the detection of endocervical chlamydial infections was 89.7% and the specificity was 100%. The positive and negative predictive values of PCR were 100% and 99%, respectively. The sensitivity of Chlamydiazyme in the detection of cervical infections was 61.5% and the specificity was 99.7%, with a positive predictive value of 96.0%. Among all patients with urogenital chlamydial infections, concomitant infections in the urethra and cervix occurred in 52.5%, whereas the urthra or cervix was solely infected in 35.0% and 12.5%, respectively.

Conclusions: This PCR-based technique is a rapid screening tool for the diagnosis of urogenital chlamydial infections and is more sensitive than Chlamydiazyme for endocervical infections in a sexually transmitted disease clinic population.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (479.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barnes R. C. Laboratory diagnosis of human chlamydial infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1989 Apr;2(2):119–136. doi: 10.1128/cmr.2.2.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bobo L., Coutlee F., Yolken R. H., Quinn T., Viscidi R. P. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection by detection of amplified DNA with an enzyme immunoassay. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Sep;28(9):1968–1973. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.9.1968-1973.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clarke L. M., Sierra M. F., Daidone B. J., Lopez N., Covino J. M., McCormack W. M. Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Apr;31(4):968–971. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.4.968-971.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gravett M. G., Nelson H. P., DeRouen T., Critchlow C., Eschenbach D. A., Holmes K. K. Independent associations of bacterial vaginosis and Chlamydia trachomatis infection with adverse pregnancy outcome. JAMA. 1986 Oct 10;256(14):1899–1903. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Griffais R., Thibon M. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction. Res Microbiol. 1989 Feb;140(2):139–141. doi: 10.1016/0923-2508(89)90047-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Holmes K. K., Handsfield H. H., Wang S. P., Wentworth B. B., Turck M., Anderson J. B., Alexander E. R. Etiology of nongonococcal urethritis. N Engl J Med. 1975 Jun 5;292(23):1199–1205. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197506052922301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ostergaard L., Birkelund S., Christiansen G. Use of polymerase chain reaction for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jun;28(6):1254–1260. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.6.1254-1260.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stamm W. E. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infections. Ann Intern Med. 1988 May;108(5):710–717. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-108-5-710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sweet R. L., Landers D. V., Walker C., Schachter J. Chlamydia trachomatis infection and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Apr;156(4):824–833. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(87)90338-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wager G. P., Martin D. H., Koutsky L., Eschenbach D. A., Daling J. R., Chiang W. T., Alexander E. R., Holmes K. K. Puerperal infectious morbidity: relationship to route of delivery and to antepartum Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Dec 1;138(7 Pt 2):1028–1033. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)91102-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES