Abstract
Objective: In order to determine the practice habits of obstetricians concerning frequency of prenatal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing and management strategies for HIV-seropositive obstetric patients, we conducted a telephone survey of practicing obstetricians over a 3-month period.
Methods: In the New Orleans metropolitan area, 71/104 (68%) obstetricians participated and completed the survey.
Results: Of these obstetricians, 43/71 (60.6%) test all new obstetric patients for HIV; 64/71 (84.5%) routinely ask the patients about risk factors for infection; and 28/71 (39.4%) have actually cared for an HIV-positive patient in their practice. Those obstetricians who routinely tested for HIV were more likely to have personally managed an infected patient and more likely to ask about risk factors. The number of obstetricians who would manage infected patients without consultative assistance was 8/71 (11%).
Conclusions: We concluded that obstetricians in this community have largely accepted routinely offered prenatal testing and risk assessment, but they have assumed a relatively small role in risk reduction counseling and treatment.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (402.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Abadie R., Hoffman E. Physician practices and attitudes on HIV-related issues: a survey of LSMS primary care physicians. J La State Med Soc. 1992 Jun;144(6):283–288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boekeloo B. O., Marx E. S., Kral A. H., Coughlin S. C., Bowman M., Rabin D. L. Frequency and thoroughness of STD/HIV risk assessment by physicians in a high-risk metropolitan area. Am J Public Health. 1991 Dec;81(12):1645–1648. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.12.1645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boekeloo B. O., Rabin D. L., Coughlin S. S., Labbok M. H., Johnson J. C. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of obstetricians-gynecologists regarding the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jan;81(1):131–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darr M. S., Sinclair A. E. HIV disease: educational needs of Oregon family physicians. Fam Med. 1992 Jan;24(1):21–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gemson D. H., Colombotos J., Elinson J., Fordyce E. J., Hynes M., Stoneburner R. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome prevention. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of primary care physicians. Arch Intern Med. 1991 Jun;151(6):1102–1108. doi: 10.1001/archinte.151.6.1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lofgren J. P. Update: October 1988 physician survey about AIDS. J Ark Med Soc. 1988 Oct;85(5):199–202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Minkoff H. L., Landesman S. H. The case for routinely offering prenatal testing for human immunodeficiency virus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Oct;159(4):793–796. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(88)80136-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nolan K. Human immunodeficiency virus infection, women, and pregnancy. Ethical issues. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1990 Sep;17(3):651–668. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shultz J. M., MacDonald K. L., Heckert K. A., Osterholm M. T. The Minnesota AIDS physician survey. A statewide survey of physician knowledge and clinical practice regarding AIDS. Minn Med. 1988 May;71(5):277–283. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]