Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and side effects of erythromycin, amoxicillin, and clindamycin in eradicating Chlamydia trachomatis from the lower genital tract of pregnant women.
Methods: A total of 174 women at <36 weeks gestation with positive cervical cultures for C. trachomatis were enrolled. Patients were assigned in a randomized prospective fashion to either erythromycin (500 mg q.i.d, for 7 days), amoxicillin (500 mg t.i.d, for 7 days), or clindamycin (600 mg t.i.d, for 10 days). Six women elected not to participate and 8 patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 53 patients in the erythromycin group, 55 patients in the amoxicillin group, and 52 patients in the clindamycin group. All sexual partners of the enrolled women were offered doxycycline (100 mg b.i.d. for 7 days) and patients were instructed to use barrier contraception until treatment was complete.
Results: All 3 medications were effective agents for the treatment of antenatal C. trachomatis infection with treatment efficacies of 96%, 94%, and 98% for the erythromycin, amoxicillin, and clindamycin groups, respectively. When the antibiotic groups were compared, no statistically significant differences were noted in intolerance. However, the differences in the incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms between erythromycin and amoxicillin and/or clindamycin were significant (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: These findings suggest that 1) all 3 antibiotic regimens are efficacious, 2) erythromycin has a higher incidence of side effects, and 3) amoxicillin or clindamycin are reasonable alternatives for the treatment of C. trachomatis in pregnant patients unable to tolerate erythromycin.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (370.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Alger L. S., Lovchik J. C. Comparative efficacy of clindamycin versus erythromycin in eradication of antenatal Chlamydia trachomatis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Aug;165(2):375–381. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90097-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bowie W. R., Yu J. S., Jones H. D. Partial efficacy of clindamycin against Chlamydia trachomatis in men with nongonococcal urethritis. Sex Transm Dis. 1986 Apr-Jun;13(2):76–80. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198604000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell W. F., Dodson M. G. Clindamycin therapy for Chlamydia trachomatis in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Feb;162(2):343–347. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90382-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crombleholme W. R., Schachter J., Grossman M., Landers D. V., Sweet R. L. Amoxicillin therapy for Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 May;75(5):752–756. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Magat A. H., Alger L. S., Nagey D. A., Hatch V., Lovchik J. C. Double-blind randomized study comparing amoxicillin and erythromycin for the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 May;81(5 ):745–749. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silverman N. S., Sullivan M., Hochman M., Womack M., Jungkind D. L. A randomized, prospective trial comparing amoxicillin and erythromycin for the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Mar;170(3):829–832. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70292-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]