Skip to main content
Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology logoLink to Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology
. 1995;3(3):91–97. doi: 10.1155/S1064744995000391

In Vitro Ability of the Group B Streptococci to Inhibit Gram-Positive and Gram-Variable Constituents of the Bacterial Flora of the Female Genital Tract

Pongsakdi Chaisilwattana 1, Gilles R G Monif 2,
PMCID: PMC2364431  PMID: 18476028

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the ability of septicemic and nonsepticemic isolates of group B streptococci (GBS) to inhibit in vitro the principal bacterial groups found in the normal bacterial flora of the female genital tract.

Methods: The target groups were composed of 1) 10 strains each of the following: viridans streptococci, nonhemolytic streptococci (not group B or D), group A streptococci, GBS, peptostreptococci, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus, and Gardnerella vaginalis; 2) 9 strains of enterococci; 3) 9 strains of group C or G streptococci; 4) 7 strains of lactobacilli; and 5) 7 strains of diphtheroids. All target groups were tested for inhibition by a test panel of either a group of 10 or 41 GBS isolates. If the GBS isolates failed to inhibit a target group, that group was tested for its ability to inhibit the GBS test panel.

Results: The GBS test panel did not inhibit the growth of coagulase-negative staphylococci or S. aureus but uniformly inhibited groups A, B, C, and G streptococci, lactobacilli, and G. vaginalis. One of the 7 strains of diphtheroids was inhibited by 37 of the 41 GBS isolates; the other 6 strains of diphtheroids were uniformly inhibited. Variable inhibition by GBS was observed with viridans streptococci, nonhemolytic (not group B or D) streptococci, peptostreptococci, and enterococci; however, inhibition or noninhibition was uniform for a given target strain against the entire GBS test panel. The 23 GBS isolates obtained from septicemic neonates or adults did not differ from the 18 nonsepticemic isolates in their ability to inhibit other species of streptococci or other gram-positive or gram-variable constituents of the bacterial flora of the female genital tract. When converse testing was done, all 10 GBS isolates were uniformly inhibited by coagulase-negative staphylococci and by the majority of enterococci, but were not inhibited by S. aureus.

Conclusions: These studies suggest that GBS may be significant regulators of other β-hemolytic streptococci, diphtheroids, lactobacilli, and G. vaginalis within the bacterial flora of the female genital tract. Moreover, the absence of GBS in the vaginal flora may be the result of mediation by coagulase-negative staphylococci and selected strains of enterococci.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (635.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anthony B. F., Wannamaker L. W. Bacterial interference in experimental burns. J Exp Med. 1967 Feb 1;125(2):319–336. doi: 10.1084/jem.125.2.319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BROCK T. D., PEACHER B., PIERSON D. SURVEY OF THE BACTERIOCINES OF ENTEROCOCCI. J Bacteriol. 1963 Oct;86:702–707. doi: 10.1128/jb.86.4.702-707.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker C. J., Barrett F. F. Transmission of group B streptococci among parturient women and their neonates. J Pediatr. 1973 Dec;83(6):919–925. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(73)80524-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bartlett J. G., Moon N. E., Goldstein P. R., Goren B., Onderdonk A. B., Polk B. F. Cervical and vaginal bacterial flora: ecologic niches in the female lower genital tract. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Mar 15;130(6):658–661. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(78)90323-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergqvist G., Hurvell B., Thal E., Vaclavinkova V. Neonatal infections caused by group B streptococci. Relation between the occurrence in the vaginal flora of term pregnant women and infection in the newborn infant. Scand J Infect Dis. 1971;3(3):209–212. doi: 10.3109/inf.1971.3.issue-3.05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Crowe C. C., Sanders W. E., Jr, Longley S. Bacterial interference. II. Role of the normal throat flora in prevention of colonization by group A Streptococcus. J Infect Dis. 1973 Oct;128(4):527–532. doi: 10.1093/infdis/128.4.527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DE KLERK H. C., COETZEE J. N. Antibiosis among lactobacilli. Nature. 1961 Oct 28;192:340–341. doi: 10.1038/192340a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dajani A. S., Wannamaker L. W. Demonstration of a bactericidal substance against beta-hemolytic streptococci in supernatant fluids of staphylococcal cultures. J Bacteriol. 1969 Mar;97(3):985–991. doi: 10.1128/jb.97.3.985-991.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gorbach S. L., Menda K. B., Thadepalli H., Keith L. Anaerobic microflora of the cervix in healthy women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973 Dec 15;117(8):1053–1055. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(73)90753-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Holmberg K., Hallander H. O. Interference between gram-positive microorganisms in dental plaque. J Dent Res. 1972 Mar-Apr;51(2):588–595. doi: 10.1177/00220345720510025801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ledger W. J., Norman M., Gee C., Lewis W. Bacteremia on an obstetric-gynecologic service. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Jan 15;121(2):205–212. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(75)90641-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Levison M. E., Corman L. C., Carrington E. R., Kaye D. Quantitative microflora of the vagina. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Jan 1;127(1):80–85. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(77)90318-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Monif G. R., Thompson J. L., Stephens H. D., Baer H. Quantitative and qualitative effects of povidone-iodine liquid and gel on the aerobic and anaerobic flora of the female genital tract. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Jun 15;137(4):432–438. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)91123-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Murray P. R., Rosenblatt J. E. Bacterial interference by oropharynegeal and clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria. J Infect Dis. 1976 Sep;134(3):281–285. doi: 10.1093/infdis/134.3.281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ohm M. J., Galask R. P. Bacterial flora of the cervix from 100 prehysterectomy patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Jul 15;122(6):683–687. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(75)90571-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. REEVES P. THE BACTERIOCINS. Bacteriol Rev. 1965 Mar;29:24–45. doi: 10.1128/br.29.1.24-45.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Reed W. P., Selinger D. S., Albright E. L., Abdin Z. H., Williams R. C., Jr Streptococcal adherence to pharyngeal cells of children with acute rheumatic fever. J Infect Dis. 1980 Dec;142(6):803–810. doi: 10.1093/infdis/142.6.803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Reed W. P., Williams R. C., Jr Bacterial adherence: first step in pathogenesis of certain infections. J Chronic Dis. 1978 Feb;31(2):67–72. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(78)90091-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ribble J. C. A mechanism of bacterial interference in vitro. J Immunol. 1967 Apr;98(4):716–723. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. SHINEFIELD H. R., RIBBLE J. C., EICHENWALD H. F., BORIS M., SUTHERLAND J. M. Bacterial interference: its effect on nursery-acquired infection with Staphylococcus aureus. V. An analysis and interpretation. Am J Dis Child. 1963 Jun;105:683–688. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tagg J. R., Dajani A. S., Wannamaker L. W. Bacteriocins of gram-positive bacteria. Bacteriol Rev. 1976 Sep;40(3):722–756. doi: 10.1128/br.40.3.722-756.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tashjian J. H., Coulam C. B., Washington J. A., 2nd Vaginal flora in asymptomatic women. Mayo Clin Proc. 1976 Sep;51(9):557–561. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. White C. A., Koontz F. P. -Hemolytic streptococcus infections in postpartum patients. Obstet Gynecol. 1973 Jan;41(1):27–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES