Abstract
Objective: We sought to determine if changing the surgeon's gloves after delivery of the infant and prior to manual placental removal decreases the incidence of postcesarean endometritis.
Methods: Laboring women undergoing cesarean delivery between September 1, 1994, and August 31, 1995, were prospectively randomized into either a change or no-change glove group. In the change-glove group, the surgeon's gloves were changed after delivery of the infant and before manual removal of the placenta. All patients enrolled received a single prophylactic dose of an IV antibiotic after clamping of the umbilical cord. Endometritis was diagnosed by an oral temperature of ≥38℃ on 2 occasions at least 6 h apart and >24 h after delivery, uterine tenderness, peripheral blood leukocytosis (≥15,000 cells/ml), and the exclusion of other foci of infection. In order to detect a reduction in endometritis from 14% to 2%, at P < 0.05 with 80% power, we needed 95 patients in each group.
Results: Two hundred twenty-eight women were randomized to 2 groups: 113 were in the change group and 115 in the no-change group. No significant differences were noted between the groups with respect to demographics, duration of labor, length of ruptured membranes, number of vaginal examinations, duration of internal monitoring, length of surgery, blood loss, or infant weight. There was no decrease in the incidence of endometritis between the change group (17.7%) and the no-change group (15.7%) (relative risk 1.1, 95% confidence interval 0.75–1.47).
Conclusions: In this study, the incidence of postcesarean endometritis was not decreased by changing the surgeon's gloves after delivery of the infant but before placental extraction.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (337.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Chang P. L., Newton E. R. Predictors of antibiotic prophylactic failure in post-cesarean endometritis. Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jul;80(1):117–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duff P. Prophylactic antibiotics for cesarean delivery: a simple cost-effective strategy for prevention of postoperative morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Oct;157(4 Pt 1):794–798. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80057-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duff P., Smith P. N., Keiser J. F. Antibiotic prophylaxis in low-risk cesarean section. J Reprod Med. 1982 Mar;27(3):133–138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gilstrap L. C., 3rd, Cunningham F. G. The bacterial pathogenesis of infection following cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 1979 May;53(5):545–549. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gonik B., Shannon R. L., Shawar R., Costner M., Seibel M. Why patients fail antibiotic prophylaxis at cesarean delivery: histologic evidence for incipient infection. Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Feb;79(2):179–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gonik B. Single- versus three-dose cefotaxime prophylaxis for cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Feb;65(2):189–193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCurdy C. M., Jr, Magann E. F., McCurdy C. J., Saltzman A. K. The effect of placental management at cesarean delivery on operative blood loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Nov;167(5):1363–1367. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)91717-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Newton E. R., Prihoda T. J., Gibbs R. S. A clinical and microbiologic analysis of risk factors for puerperal endometritis. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Mar;75(3 Pt 1):402–406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swartz W. H., Grolle K. The use of prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section. A review of the literature. J Reprod Med. 1981 Dec;26(12):595–609. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yancey M. K., Clark P., Duff P. The frequency of glove contamination during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Apr;83(4):538–542. doi: 10.1097/00006250-199404000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]