Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefits achievable by Amplicor polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (F. Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland) with urine specimens in addition to PACE 2 (Gen-Probe, Inc., San Diego, California) assay with cervical swab specimens in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in women.
Methods: Cervical and urine specimens from 286 women were tested for C. trachomatis by PACE 2 and Amplicor PCR, respectively. All urine specimens were analyzed undiluted and diluted 1:10 to detect and eliminate possible PCR inhibition. A confirmatory PCR assay using major outer membrane protein-based primers (MOMP-PCR) was used on urine specimens that were positive by PCR from women who were negative by PACE 2 with cervical swab specimens.
Results: Of the endocervical specimens, 26 were positive by the PACE 2 assay. The PCR with urine was positive in 21 of these patients. When the urine specimens were analyzed diluted 1:10, 4 of the 5 PCR-negative specimens from PACE 2-positive patients turned positive by the PCR. Additionally, 4 urine specimens from PACE 2-negative women were positive by the PCR with urine, and 3 of them could be confirmed by MOMP-PCR. Altogether, 29 women were found to be positive for C. trachomatis by either of the two assays.
Conclusions: By using the PCR with urine specimens, an 11% increase in sensitivity could be achieved in addition to that obtained by PACE 2 assay with cervical swab specimens. In the present material, however, the increased sensitivity was reversed by the presence of PCR inhibitors in 14% of the female urine specimens. Amplicor PCR with urine specimens can undoubtedly be recommended for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections in women. However, constant monitoring of the PCR inhibition seems highly advisable to obtain full benefit of the sensitivity of the PCR.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (397.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bass C. A., Jungkind D. L., Silverman N. S., Bondi J. M. Clinical evaluation of a new polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Oct;31(10):2648–2653. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.10.2648-2653.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bauwens J. E., Clark A. M., Loeffelholz M. J., Herman S. A., Stamm W. E. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis in men by polymerase chain reaction assay of first-catch urine. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Nov;31(11):3013–3016. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.11.3013-3016.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bradley M. G., Hobson D., Lee N., Tait I. A., Rees E. Chlamydial infections of the urethra in women. Genitourin Med. 1985 Dec;61(6):371–375. doi: 10.1136/sti.61.6.371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chernesky M., Castriciano S., Sellors J., Stewart I., Cunningham I., Landis S., Seidelman W., Grant L., Devlin C., Mahony J. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in urine as an alternative to swabs and cultures. J Infect Dis. 1990 Jan;161(1):124–126. doi: 10.1093/infdis/161.1.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dutilh B., Bébéar C., Rodriguez P., Vekris A., Bonnet J., Garret M. Specific amplification of a DNA sequence common to all Chlamydia trachomatis serovars using the polymerase chain reaction. Res Microbiol. 1989 Jan;140(1):7–16. doi: 10.1016/0923-2508(89)90053-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jaschek G., Gaydos C. A., Welsh L. E., Quinn T. C. Direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men by using a rapid polymerase chain reaction assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 May;31(5):1209–1212. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.5.1209-1212.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miettinen A., Vuorinen P., Varis T., Hällström O. Comparison of enzyme immunoassay antigen detection, nucleic acid hybridization and PCR assay in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 Jun;14(6):546–549. doi: 10.1007/BF02113438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moncada J., Schachter J., Shafer M. A., Williams E., Gourlay L., Lavin B., Bolan G. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first catch urine samples from symptomatic and asymptomatic males. Sex Transm Dis. 1994 Jan-Feb;21(1):8–12. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199401000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pasternack R., Vuorinen P., Kuukankorpi A., Pitkäjärvi T., Miettinen A. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women by Amplicor PCR: comparison of diagnostic performance with urine and cervical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Apr;34(4):995–998. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.4.995-998.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skulnick M., Chua R., Simor A. E., Low D. E., Khosid H. E., Fraser S., Lyons E., Legere E. A., Kitching D. A. Use of the polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from endocervical and urine specimens in an asymptomatic low-prevalence population of women. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Dec;20(4):195–201. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(94)90003-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith T. F., Weed L. A. Comparison of urethral swabs, urine, and urinary sediment for the isolation of Chlamydia. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Aug;2(2):134–135. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stary A., Teodorowicz L., Hörting-Müller I., Nerad S., Storch M. Evaluation of the Gen-Probe PACE 2 and the Microtrak enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital samples. Sex Transm Dis. 1994 Jan-Feb;21(1):26–30. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199401000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Warren R., Dwyer B., Plackett M., Pettit K., Rizvi N., Baker A. M. Comparative evaluation of detection assays for Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jun;31(6):1663–1666. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.6.1663-1666.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiesenfeld H. C., Uhrin M., Dixon B. W., Sweet R. L. Diagnosis of male Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis by polymerase chain reaction. Sex Transm Dis. 1994 Sep-Oct;21(5):268–271. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199409000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]