Abstract
Objective: The goals of this study were 1) to better define the labial microflora and 2) to evaluate whether extended non-menstrual use of panty liners would increase genital carriage of undesirable bacteria and predispose to infection.
Methods: Healthy female volunteers (224) were prospectively randomized into panty liner wear groups A (Always® deodorant) and B (Always® non-deodorant) and into a control group C (no panty liner wear) with instructions for non-menstrual ± menstrual use ≥5 h daily for 6 months. Selected aerobic bacteria were semiquantitatively cultured from the inner labial groove, the posterior fornix of the vagina, and the cervix pre-study and post-study. Used panty liners were quantitatively cultured, and vaginal secretions were examined by gas chromatography for fatty acid ratios as a measure of microbial flora shifts.
Results: At the pre-study, labial microflora in this study population contained significantly higher frequencies of Staphylococcus, coliforms, other gram-negative rods, and enterococci, and a decreased frequency of Gardnerella vaginalis relative to the vaginal microflora. After 6 months use of panty liners the frequencies (and densities) of the selected microorganisms in these two sites had not changed compared to controls, and fatty acid analyses of vaginal secretions gave no evidence of shifts in the microbial flora.
Conclusions: Frequencies of selected genital microflora were different for the labia compared to the vagina. No increased carriage of medically important species was detected for either site after 6 months of daily (average 7.8 h) panty liner use.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (581.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Amsel R., Totten P. A., Spiegel C. A., Chen K. C., Eschenbach D., Holmes K. K. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med. 1983 Jan;74(1):14–22. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)91112-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Faur Y. C., Weisburd M. H., Wilson M. E., May P. S. A new medium for the isolation of pathogenic Neisseria (NYC medium). I. Formulation and comparisons with standard media. Health Lab Sci. 1973 Apr;10(2):44–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenwood J. R., Pickett M. J., Martin W. J., Mack E. G. Heamophilus vaginalis (Corynebacterium vaginal): method for isolation and rapid biochemical identification. Health Lab Sci. 1977 Apr;14(2):102–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hanke-Baier P., Johannigmann J., Levin R. J., Wagner G. Evaluation of vaginal and perineal area during the use of external sanitary protection throughout the menstrual cycle. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994 Jul;73(6):486–491. doi: 10.3109/00016349409013437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill G. B., Eschenbach D. A., Holmes K. K. Bacteriology of the vagina. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1984;86:23–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill G. B. The microbiology of bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Aug;169(2 Pt 2):450–454. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90339-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spiegel C. A., Amsel R., Eschenbach D., Schoenknecht F., Holmes K. K. Anaerobic bacteria in nonspecific vaginitis. N Engl J Med. 1980 Sep 11;303(11):601–607. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198009113031102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Watt B., Goldacre M. J., Loudon N., Annat D. J., Harris R. I., Vessey M. P. Prevalence of bacteria in the vagina of normal young women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981 Jun;88(6):588–595. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1981.tb01213.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilhelm D., Elsner P., Pine H. L., Maibach H. I. Evaluation of vulvar irritancy potential of a menstrual pad containing sodium bicarbonate in short-term application. J Reprod Med. 1991 Aug;36(8):556–560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]