Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to validate the standard minimal clinical criteria and the laparoscopic triad of tubal edema, erythema, and purulent exudate used to diagnose acute upper genital tract infection.
Methods: Subjects included women who either met the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) minimal criteria for acute pelvic inflammatory disease or had other signs of upper genital tract infection (i.e., atypical pelvic pain, abnormal uterine bleeding, or cervicitis). The subjects were evaluated with a baseline interview comprehensive laboratory testing, and either an endometrial biopsy or laparoscopy with endometrial and fimbrial biopsies for definitive diagnosis of upper genital tract infection. Patients were considered positive for upper genital tract infection if they had any of the following findings: 1) histologic evidence of endometritis or salpingitis; 2) laparoscopic visualization of purulent exudate in the pelvis without another source; or 3) positive testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae or Chlamydia trachomatis from the endometrium, fallopian tubes, or pelvis.
Results: One hundred twenty-nine women with adequate endometrial samples were evaluated between August 1993 and September 1997, and 62 had complete laparoscopic evaluations. The sensitivities of the CDC's minimal clinical criteria for pelvic inflammatory disease and the laparoscopic triad of edema, erythema, and purulent exudate were 65% and 60%, respectively.
Conclusions: Commonly used minimal clinical criteria for pelvic inflammatory disease and the laparoscopic triad of tubal edema, erythema, and purulent exudate have limited sensitivity with correspondingly high false negative rates.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (486.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Hadgu A., Westrom L., Brooks C. A., Reynolds G. H., Thompson S. E. Predicting acute pelvic inflammatory disease: a multivariate analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Nov;155(5):954–960. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90324-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- JACOBSON L. LAPAROSCOPY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE SALPINGITIS. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1964;43:160–174. doi: 10.3109/00016346409158187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacobson L., Weström L. Objectivized diagnosis of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Diagnostic and prognostic value of routine laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969 Dec 1;105(7):1088–1098. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(69)90132-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Korn A. P., Hessol N., Padian N., Bolan G., Muzsnai D., Donegan E., Jonte J., Schachter J., Landers D. V. Commonly used diagnostic criteria for pelvic inflammatory disease have poor sensitivity for plasma cell endometritis. Sex Transm Dis. 1995 Nov-Dec;22(6):335–341. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199511000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCormack W. M., Nowroozi K., Alpert S., Sackel S. G., Lee Y. H., Lowe E. W., Rankin J. S. Acute pelvic inflammatory disease: characteristics of patients with gonococcal and nongonococcal infection and evaluation of their response to treatment with aqueous procaine penicillin G and spectinomycin hydrochloride. Sex Transm Dis. 1977 Oct-Dec;4(4):125–131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peipert J. F., Boardman L., Hogan J. W., Sung J., Mayer K. H. Laboratory evaluation of acute upper genital tract infection. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 May;87(5 Pt 1):730–736. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00040-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peipert J. F., Sweeney P. J. Diagnostic testing in obstetrics and gynecology: a clinician's guide. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Oct;82(4 Pt 1):619–623. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ransohoff D. F., Feinstein A. R. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med. 1978 Oct 26;299(17):926–930. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197810262991705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sellors J., Mahony J., Goldsmith C., Rath D., Mander R., Hunter B., Taylor C., Groves D., Richardson H., Chernesky M. The accuracy of clinical findings and laparoscopy in pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jan;164(1 Pt 1):113–120. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90639-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]