Abstract
Physicians encounter complex and sensitive ethical challenges in the medical care of pregnant women with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. This paper identifies those ethical challenges and provides concrete clinical guidance for how they should be addressed in obstetric care. The paper begins with a brief historical review, to highlight and to call into question the civil rights model of the ethics of HIV infection that has dominated the literature, clinical practice, and public policy. The authors propose an alternative ethical framework. This framework begins by underscoring the public health obligations of both physicians and pregnant women with HIV infection. The framework is based on a clinical ethics that appeals to both beneficence-based and autonomy-based obligations of the physician to the pregnant woman and the beneficence-based obligations of both the physician and the pregnant woman to the fetal patient. This framework is then deployed in a clinical ethical analysis of termination of pregnancy and contraception, partner notification, disclosure and confidentiality of her serostatus by the patient to the health care team, disclosure and confidentiality of her serostatus to other health care professionals, prevention of vertical transmission, and advance directives.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (615.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Connor E. M., Sperling R. S., Gelber R., Kiselev P., Scott G., O'Sullivan M. J., VanDyke R., Bey M., Shearer W., Jacobson R. L. Reduction of maternal-infant transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with zidovudine treatment. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 076 Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994 Nov 3;331(18):1173–1180. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199411033311801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doukas D. J., McCullough L. B. The values history. The evaluation of the patient's values and advance directives. J Fam Pract. 1991 Feb;32(2):145–153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emanuel L. L., Emanuel E. J. The Medical Directive. A new comprehensive advance care document. JAMA. 1989 Jun 9;261(22):3288–3293. doi: 10.1001/jama.261.22.3288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Essex-Sorlie D. The Americans with Disabilities Act: I. History, summary, and key components. Acad Med. 1994 Jul;69(7):519–524. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199407000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kass N. E. Policy, ethics, and reproductive choice: pregnancy and childbearing among HIV-infected women. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1994 Aug;400:95–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1994.tb13344.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Minkoff H. L., DeHovitz J. A. Care of women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. JAMA. 1991 Oct 23;266(16):2253–2258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Volberding P. A., Lagakos S. W., Grimes J. M., Stein D. S., Rooney J., Meng T. C., Fischl M. A., Collier A. C., Phair J. P., Hirsch M. S. A comparison of immediate with deferred zidovudine therapy for asymptomatic HIV-infected adults with CD4 cell counts of 500 or more per cubic millimeter. AIDS Clinical Trials Group. N Engl J Med. 1995 Aug 17;333(7):401–407. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199508173330701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]