Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between postoperative abdominal incision problems and opening subcutaneous tissues with electrocautery or scalpel. Women scheduled for elective abdominal hysterectomy who gave informed consent were randomly assigned to subcutaneous abdominal wall tissue incision by electrocautery or scalpel. Postoperative abdominal wound problem diagnoses included seroma, hematoma, infection, or dehiscence without identifiable etiology. Fifteen of 380 women (3.9%) developed a wound problem; six had scalpel and nine had electrosurgical subcutaneous incisions (P = 0.4). Thicker subcutaneous tissues (P = 0.04) and concurrent pelvic infection (P < 0.001) were significant risk factors for postoperative wound problems. Only two women (0.5%) developed an infection. We conclude that the method of subcutaneous tissue incision was unrelated to the development of postoperative abdominal incision problems in 380 women undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (392.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Arnaud J. P., Adloff M. Electrosurgery and wound healing: an experimental study in rats. Eur Surg Res. 1980;12(6):439–443. doi: 10.1159/000128152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cruse P. J., Foord R. The epidemiology of wound infection. A 10-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surg Clin North Am. 1980 Feb;60(1):27–40. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)42031-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gatti J. E., Bryant C. J., Noone R. B., Murphy J. B. The mutagenicity of electrocautery smoke. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992 May;89(5):781–786. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson C. D., Serpell J. W. Wound infection after abdominal incision with scalpel or diathermy. Br J Surg. 1990 Jun;77(6):626–627. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800770610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ledger W. J. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of postoperative infections. Obstet Gynecol. 1980 May;55(5 Suppl):203S–206S. doi: 10.1097/00006250-198003001-00050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]