Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1999 Mar;79(9-10):1366–1371. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690219

Fibroblast radiosensitivity measured using the comet DNA-damage assay correlates with clonogenic survival parameters

A M Eastham 1, B Marples 1, A E Kiltie 1, C J Orton 1, C M L West 1
PMCID: PMC2374263  PMID: 10188877

Abstract

A study was made of the neutral comet assay as a potential method for measuring normal cell radiosensitivity. Eleven fibroblast strains were studied comprising nine derived from vaginal biopsies from pretreatment cervical cancer patients and two strains from radiosensitive individuals. DNA double strand break (dsbs) dose–response curves for both initial and residual (20-h repair time) damage were obtained over the dose range 0–240 Gy, with slopes varying 3.2 and 8-fold respectively. Clonogenic cell survival parameters were available for all the cell strains following both high- and low-dose rate irradiation. There were no correlations between the dose–response slope of the initial level of DNA dsbs and parameters that mainly describe the initial portion of clonogenic radiation survival curves (SF 2, α, D̄-). A significant correlation (r = –0.63, P = 0.04) was found between the extent of residual DNA dsbs and clonogenicity for all 11 fibroblast strains. The parameter showing the highest correlation with fibroblast cell killing (D-) for the nine normal fibroblasts alone was the ratio of initial/residual DNA dsb dose–response slope (r = 0.80, P = < 0.01). A significant correlation (r = –0.67, P = 0.03) with clonogenic radiosensitivity was also found for all 11 cell strains when using the ratio of initial/residual DNA dsb damage at a single dose of 180 Gy. This study shows that fibroblast radiosensitivity measured using the neutral comet assay correlates with clonogenic radiation survival parameters, and therefore may have potential value in predictive testing of normal tissue radiosensitivity. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign

Keywords: DNA damage, fibroblasts, comet assay, intrinsic radiosensitivity, predictive assays

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (98.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ashby J., Tinwell H., Lefevre P. A., Browne M. A. The single cell gel electrophoresis assay for induced DNA damage (comet assay): measurement of tail length and moment. Mutagenesis. 1995 Mar;10(2):85–90. doi: 10.1093/mutage/10.2.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Badie C., Iliakis G., Foray N., Alsbeih G., Cedervall B., Chavaudra N., Pantelias G., Arlett C., Malaise E. P. Induction and rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks and interphase chromosome breaks after exposure to X rays in one normal and two hypersensitive human fibroblast cell lines. Radiat Res. 1995 Oct;144(1):26–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blöcher D., Sigut D., Hannan M. A. Fibroblasts from ataxia telangiectasia (AT) and AT heterozygotes show an enhanced level of residual DNA double-strand breaks after low dose-rate gamma-irradiation as assayed by pulsed field gel electrophoresis. Int J Radiat Biol. 1991 Nov;60(5):791–802. doi: 10.1080/09553009114552601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brock W. A., Tucker S. L., Geara F. B., Turesson I., Wike J., Nyman J., Peters L. J. Fibroblast radiosensitivity versus acute and late normal skin responses in patients treated for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Jul 30;32(5):1371–1379. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00068-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burnet N. G., Nyman J., Turesson I., Wurm R., Yarnold J. R., Peacock J. H. The relationship between cellular radiation sensitivity and tissue response may provide the basis for individualising radiotherapy schedules. Radiother Oncol. 1994 Dec;33(3):228–238. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(94)90358-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burnet N. G., Wurm R., Peacock J. H. Low dose-rate fibroblast radiosensitivity and the prediction of patient response to radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Biol. 1996 Sep;70(3):289–300. doi: 10.1080/095530096145021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fairbairn D. W., Olive P. L., O'Neill K. L. The comet assay: a comprehensive review. Mutat Res. 1995 Feb;339(1):37–59. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(94)00013-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hannan M. A., Blöcher D., Sigut D., Waghray M. DNA double strand breaks in fibroblast cell lines, from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients, showing increased sensitivity to chronic gamma irradiation. Cancer Lett. 1991 May 1;57(2):137–143. doi: 10.1016/0304-3835(91)90207-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Iliakis G. E., Metzger L., Denko N., Stamato T. D. Detection of DNA double-strand breaks in synchronous cultures of CHO cells by means of asymmetric field inversion gel electrophoresis. Int J Radiat Biol. 1991 Feb;59(2):321–341. doi: 10.1080/09553009114550311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Johansen J., Bentzen S. M., Overgaard J., Overgaard M. Relationship between the in vitro radiosensitivity of skin fibroblasts and the expression of subcutaneous fibrosis, telangiectasia, and skin erythema after radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 1996 Aug;40(2):101–109. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(96)01777-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kiltie A. E., Orton C. J., Ryan A. J., Roberts S. A., Marples B., Davidson S. E., Hunter R. D., Margison G. P., West C. M., Hendry J. H. A correlation between residual DNA double-strand breaks and clonogenic measurements of radiosensitivity in fibroblasts from preradiotherapy cervix cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Dec 1;39(5):1137–1144. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00545-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MacKay R. I., Niemierko A., Goitein M., Hendry J. H. Potential clinical impact of normal-tissue intrinsic radiosensitivity testing. Radiother Oncol. 1998 Feb;46(2):215–216. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(97)00179-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Marples B., Longhurst D., Eastham A. M., West C. M. The ratio of initial/residual DNA damage predicts intrinsic radiosensitivity in seven cervix carcinoma cell lines. Br J Cancer. 1998 Apr;77(7):1108–1114. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Olive P. L., Banáth J. P. Induction and rejoining of radiation-induced DNA single-strand breaks: "tail moment" as a function of position in the cell cycle. Mutat Res. 1993 Oct;294(3):275–283. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(93)90010-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Olive P. L., Banáth J. P., MacPhail H. S. Lack of a correlation between radiosensitivity and DNA double-strand break induction or rejoining in six human tumor cell lines. Cancer Res. 1994 Jul 15;54(14):3939–3946. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Olive P. L., Wlodek D., Banáth J. P. DNA double-strand breaks measured in individual cells subjected to gel electrophoresis. Cancer Res. 1991 Sep 1;51(17):4671–4676. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rodemann H. P., Bamberg M. Cellular basis of radiation-induced fibrosis. Radiother Oncol. 1995 May;35(2):83–90. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(95)01540-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sproston A. R., West C. M., Hendry J. H. Cellular radiosensitivity in human severe-combined-immunodeficiency (SCID) syndromes. Radiother Oncol. 1997 Jan;42(1):53–57. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(96)01865-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ward J. F. The complexity of DNA damage: relevance to biological consequences. Int J Radiat Biol. 1994 Nov;66(5):427–432. doi: 10.1080/09553009414551401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wurm R., Burnet N. G., Duggal N., Yarnold J. R., Peacock J. H. Cellular radiosensitivity and DNA damage in primary human fibroblasts. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Oct 15;30(3):625–633. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(92)90949-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhou P. K., Sproston A. R., Marples B., West C. M., Margison G. P., Hendry J. H. The radiosensitivity of human fibroblast cell lines correlates with residual levels of DNA double-strand breaks. Radiother Oncol. 1998 Jun;47(3):271–276. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(97)00200-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES