Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1999 Sep;81(1):87–94. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690655

Evaluating the quality of life of cancer patients: assessments by patients, significant others, physicians and nurses

K C A Sneeuw 1, N K Aaronson 1, M A G Sprangers 3, S B Detmar 1, L D V Wever 1, J H Schornagel 2
PMCID: PMC2374350  PMID: 10487617

Abstract

This study examined the usefulness of caregiver ratings of cancer patients' quality of life (QOL), an issue of relevance to both adequate patient care and to the possible use of proxy QOL raters in clinical studies. We compared QOL ratings of 90 cancer patients receiving inpatient chemotherapy with those provided by their significant others (most often the spouse), physicians and nurses. During patients' scheduled appointment for receiving chemotherapy on a clinical ward, all raters completed independently the Dartmouth COOP Functional Health Assessment charts/WONCA, an instrument developed by a cooperative group of primary care physicians to briefly assess a core set of seven QOL domains (physical fitness, feelings, daily and social activities, overall health, pain and quality of life) by single items with five response options. With few exceptions, mean scores of the proxy raters were equivalent or similar to those of the patients. Most patient–proxy correlations varied between 0.40 and 0.60, indicating a moderate level of agreement at the individual level. Of all comparisons made, 41% were in exact agreement and 43% agreed within one response category, leaving 17% more profound patient–proxy discrepancies. Disagreement was not dependent on the type of proxy rater, or on raters' background characteristics, but was influenced by the QOL dimension under consideration and the clinical status of the patient. Better patient–proxy agreement was observed for more concrete questions (daily activities, pain) and for patients with either a very good (ECOG 0) or poor (ECOG 3) performance status. The results indicate that both significant others and health care providers can be useful sources of information about cancer patients' QOL. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign

Keywords: quality of life, proxy respondents, agreement, questionnaire

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (122.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aaronson N. K. Methodologic issues in assessing the quality of life of cancer patients. Cancer. 1991 Feb 1;67(3 Suppl):844–850. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910201)67:3+<844::aid-cncr2820671416>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Au E., Loprinzi C. L., Dhodapkar M., Nelson T., Novotny P., Hammack J., O'Fallon J. Regular use of a verbal pain scale improves the understanding of oncology inpatient pain intensity. J Clin Oncol. 1994 Dec;12(12):2751–2755. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.12.2751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blazeby J. M., Williams M. H., Alderson D., Farndon J. R. Observer variation in assessment of quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg. 1995 Sep;82(9):1200–1203. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800820916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blehert S. R. Pattern discrimination learning with rhesus monkeys. Psychol Rep. 1966 Aug;19(1):311–324. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Detmar S. B., Aaronson N. K. Quality of life assessment in daily clinical oncology practice: a feasibility study. Eur J Cancer. 1998 Jul;34(8):1181–1186. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(98)00018-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ford S., Fallowfield L., Lewis S. Can oncologists detect distress in their out-patients and how satisfied are they with their performance during bad news consultations? Br J Cancer. 1994 Oct;70(4):767–770. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hodgkins M., Albert D., Daltroy L. Comparing patients' and their physicians' assessments of pain. Pain. 1985 Nov;23(3):273–277. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90105-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. King M. T. The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res. 1996 Dec;5(6):555–567. doi: 10.1007/BF00439229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kurtz M. E., Kurtz J. C., Given C. C., Given B. Concordance of cancer patient and caregiver symptom reports. Cancer Pract. 1996 Jul-Aug;4(4):185–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Landis J. R., Koch G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Macquart-Moulin G., Viens P., Bouscary M. L., Genre D., Resbeut M., Gravis G., Camerlo J., Maraninchi D., Moatti J. P. Discordance between physicians' estimations and breast cancer patients' self-assessment of side-effects of chemotherapy: an issue for quality of care. Br J Cancer. 1997;76(12):1640–1645. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1997.610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Magaziner J. Use of proxies to measure health and functional outcomes in effectiveness research in persons with Alzheimer disease and related disorders. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1997;11 (Suppl 6):168–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Osoba D. Lessons learned from measuring health-related quality of life in oncology. J Clin Oncol. 1994 Mar;12(3):608–616. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.3.608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Osoba D., Rodrigues G., Myles J., Zee B., Pater J. Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):139–144. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schag C. C., Heinrich R. L., Ganz P. A. Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 1984 Mar;2(3):187–193. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1984.2.3.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sigurdardóttir V., Brandberg Y., Sullivan M. Criterion-based validation of the EORTC QLQ-C36 in advanced melanoma: the CIPS questionnaire and proxy raters. Qual Life Res. 1996 Jun;5(3):375–386. doi: 10.1007/BF00433922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Siu A. L., Ouslander J. G., Osterweil D., Reuben D. B., Hays R. D. Change in self-reported functioning in older persons entering a residential care facility. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Oct;46(10):1093–1101. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90108-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Slevin M. L., Plant H., Lynch D., Drinkwater J., Gregory W. M. Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient? Br J Cancer. 1988 Jan;57(1):109–112. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1988.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sneeuw K. C., Aaronson N. K., Osoba D., Muller M. J., Hsu M. A., Yung W. K., Brada M., Newlands E. S. The use of significant others as proxy raters of the quality of life of patients with brain cancer. Med Care. 1997 May;35(5):490–506. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199705000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sneeuw K. C., Aaronson N. K., Sprangers M. A., Detmar S. B., Wever L. D., Schornagel J. H. Comparison of patient and proxy EORTC QLQ-C30 ratings in assessing the quality of life of cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Jul;51(7):617–631. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00040-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sneeuw K. C., Aaronson N. K., Sprangers M. A., Detmar S. B., Wever L. D., Schornagel J. H. Value of caregiver ratings in evaluating the quality of life of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Mar;15(3):1206–1217. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.3.1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sneeuw K. C., Aaronson N. K., de Haan R. J., Limburg M. Assessing quality of life after stroke. The value and limitations of proxy ratings. Stroke. 1997 Aug;28(8):1541–1549. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.8.1541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sprangers M. A., Aaronson N. K. The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: a review. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jul;45(7):743–760. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90052-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stephens R. J., Hopwood P., Girling D. J., Machin D. Randomized trials with quality of life endpoints: are doctors' ratings of patients' physical symptoms interchangeable with patients' self-ratings? Qual Life Res. 1997 Apr;6(3):225–236. doi: 10.1023/a:1026458604826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sørensen J. B., Klee M., Palshof T., Hansen H. H. Performance status assessment in cancer patients. An inter-observer variability study. Br J Cancer. 1993 Apr;67(4):773–775. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1993.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES