Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 2000 Feb 1;82(5):1111–1116. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.1048

Completeness of cancer registration: a new method for routine use

J Bullard 1,1, M P Coleman 1,2, D Robinson 1, J-M Lutz 1,3, J Bell 1, J Peto 2
PMCID: PMC2374436  PMID: 10737395

Abstract

We report a new method of estimating the completeness of cancer registration, in which the proportions of unregistered patients are derived from the time distributions of three probabilities, each of which can be directly estimated from the registry's own data – the probabilities of survival, of registration of the cancer during the patient's life, and of the mention of cancer on the death certificate of a cancer patient who dies. This method allows completeness to be assessed routinely by factors such as age, sex, geographical area and tumour type. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign

Keywords: cancer registration, completeness, death certificate only

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (84.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brenner H. Limitations of the death certificate only index as a measure of incompleteness of cancer registration. Br J Cancer. 1995 Aug;72(2):506–510. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1995.363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brenner H. Use and limitations of the capture-recapture method in disease monitoring with two dependent sources. Epidemiology. 1995 Jan;6(1):42–48. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199501000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CUTLER S. J., EDERER F. Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J Chronic Dis. 1958 Dec;8(6):699–712. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Draper G. J., Bower B. D., Darby S. C., Doll R. Completeness of registration of childhood leukaemia near nuclear installations and elsewhere in the Oxford region. BMJ. 1989 Oct 14;299(6705):952–952. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6705.952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Freedman L. S. Variations in the level of reporting by hospitals to a regional cancer registry. Br J Cancer. 1978 May;37(5):861–865. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1978.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hawkins M. M., Swerdlow A. J. Completeness of cancer and death follow-up obtained through the National Health Service Central Register for England and Wales. Br J Cancer. 1992 Aug;66(2):408–413. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1992.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Heiberger R. M., Miller C. L., Feigl P., Lane W. W., Glaefke G. A novel method of assessing completeness of tumor registration. Cancer. 1983 Jun 15;51(12):2362–2366. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19830615)51:12<2362::aid-cncr2820511233>3.0.co;2-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hunt K., Coleman M. P. The completeness of cancer registration in follow-up studies--a cautionary note. Br J Cancer. 1987 Sep;56(3):357–359. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1987.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Larsson S. Completeness and reliability of lung cancer registration in the Swedish Cancer Registry. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A. 1971;79(4):389–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1971.tb01836.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mattsson B., Rutqvist L. E., Wallgren A. Undernotification of diagnosed cancer cases to the Stockholm Cancer Registry. Int J Epidemiol. 1985 Mar;14(1):64–69. doi: 10.1093/ije/14.1.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nwene U., Smith A. Assessing completeness of cancer registration in the north-western region of England by a method of independent comparison. Br J Cancer. 1982 Oct;46(4):635–639. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1982.248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Robles S. C., Marrett L. D., Clarke E. A., Risch H. A. An application of capture-recapture methods to the estimation of completeness of cancer registration. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(5):495–501. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90052-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schouten L. J., Straatman H., Kiemeney L. A., Gimbrère C. H., Verbeek A. L. The capture-recapture method for estimation of cancer registry completeness: a useful tool? Int J Epidemiol. 1994 Dec;23(6):1111–1116. doi: 10.1093/ije/23.6.1111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Storm H. H. Completeness of cancer registration in Denmark 1943-1966 and efficacy of record linkage procedures. Int J Epidemiol. 1988 Mar;17(1):44–49. doi: 10.1093/ije/17.1.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Swerdlow A. J., Douglas A. J., Vaughan Hudson G., Vaughan Hudson B. Completeness of cancer registration in England and Wales: an assessment based on 2,145 patients with Hodgkin's disease independently registered by the British National Lymphoma Investigation. Br J Cancer. 1993 Feb;67(2):326–329. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1993.60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Villard-Mackintosh L., Coleman M. P., Vessey M. P. The completeness of cancer registration in England: an assessment from the Oxford-FPA contraceptive study. Br J Cancer. 1988 Oct;58(4):507–511. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1988.252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Warnakulasuriya K. A., Acworth P., Bell J., Johnson N. W. Incompleteness of oral cancer registration in south-east England, 1971-87. Br J Cancer. 1994 Oct;70(4):736–738. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES